Sura Siddharth P, Ahmed Awais, Cheifetz Adam S, Moss Alan C
*Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA †Division of Gastroenterology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;48(4):351-5. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000083.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) serology testing is often used in patients with indeterminate colitis (IC) to help distinguish between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the performance of serology testing in predicting future diagnosis in this setting.
This was an observational study of individuals with IC at a single center who underwent IBD serology testing [anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA), and anti-outer membrane porin C antibody (anti-OmpC)] and had at least 12 months follow-up from the time of serology test results.
A total of 117 individuals with IC and with 1-year follow-up data were enrolled. All IC patients had endoscopic and histologic evidence of colitis at enrollment. One year after serology testing, 58 (50%) individuals with IC were diagnosed with UC, 49 (42%) with CD, and 10 (9%) remained labeled with IC. The sensitivity/specificity of an initial positive pANCA for a subsequent diagnosis of UC was 78%/44%. For ASCA and anti-OmpC, the results were 18%/84% and 27%/75%, respectively, for a subsequent diagnosis of CD. A positive pANCA test was associated with a likelihood ratio (LR) of 1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-1.8] for a subsequent diagnosis of UC at 1 year. Neither positive ASCA (LR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-2.5) nor anti-OmpC (LR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-2.0) was associated with a subsequent diagnosis of CD in patients with IC.
The disease phenotype in the majority of individuals initially labeled with IC evolved to be more consistent with either UC or CD on follow-up. pANCA, ASCA, and anti-OmpC, individually, were of limited utility in predicting a patient's subsequent disease phenotype.
炎症性肠病(IBD)血清学检测常用于不确定性结肠炎(IC)患者,以帮助区分溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)。我们研究了血清学检测在预测该情况下未来诊断的性能。
这是一项对单一中心的IC患者进行的观察性研究,这些患者接受了IBD血清学检测[抗酿酒酵母抗体(ASCA)、核周抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(pANCA)和抗外膜孔蛋白C抗体(抗OmpC)],且自血清学检测结果之时起至少有12个月的随访。
共纳入117例有1年随访数据的IC患者。所有IC患者在入组时均有结肠炎的内镜和组织学证据。血清学检测1年后,58例(50%)IC患者被诊断为UC,49例(42%)被诊断为CD,10例(9%)仍被标记为IC。初始pANCA阳性对随后UC诊断的敏感性/特异性为78%/44%。对于ASCA和抗OmpC,随后CD诊断的结果分别为18%/84%和27%/75%。pANCA检测阳性与1年后UC随后诊断的似然比(LR)为1.4[95%置信区间(CI),1.1 - 1.8]。在IC患者中,ASCA阳性(LR 1.1;95% CI,0.5 - 2.5)和抗OmpC阳性(LR 1.1;95% CI,0.6 - 2.0)均与随后的CD诊断无关。
大多数最初标记为IC的个体的疾病表型在随访中演变为更符合UC或CD。单独的pANCA、ASCA和抗OmpC在预测患者随后的疾病表型方面效用有限。