Samuel Bronfman Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;105(3):501-23; quiz 524. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.727. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
Guidelines for clinical practice are aimed to indicate preferred approaches to medical problems as established by scientifically valid research. Double-blind placebo controlled studies are preferable, but compassionate-use reports and expert review articles are used in a thorough review of the literature conducted through Medline with the National Library of Medicine. When only data that will not withstand objective scrutiny are available, a recommendation is identified as a consensus of experts. Guidelines are applicable to all physicians who address the subject regardless of specialty training or interests and are aimed to indicate the preferable but not necessarily the only acceptable approach to a specific problem. Guidelines are intended to be flexible and must be distinguished from standards of care, which are inflexible and rarely violated. Given the wide range of specifics in any health-care problem, the physician must always choose the course best suited to the individual patient and the variables in existence at the moment of decision. Guidelines are developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee and approved by the board of trustees. Each has been intensely reviewed and revised by the Committee, other experts in the field, physicians who will use them, and specialists in the science of decision analysis. The recommendations of each guideline are therefore considered valid at the time of composition based on the data available. New developments in medical research and practice pertinent to each guideline will be reviewed at a time established and indicated at publication to assure continued validity. The recommendations made are based on the level of evidence found. Grade A recommendations imply that there is consistent level 1 evidence (randomized controlled trials), grade B indicates that the evidence would be level 2 or 3, which are cohort studies or case-control studies. Grade C recommendations are based on level 4 studies, meaning case series or poor-quality cohort studies, and grade D recommendations are based on level 5 evidence, meaning expert opinion.
临床实践指南旨在指出通过科学有效的研究确立的医学问题的首选方法。双盲安慰剂对照研究是首选的,但在通过美国国家医学图书馆的 Medline 进行全面文献回顾时,也会使用同情使用报告和专家评论文章。当只有无法经受客观审查的数据可用时,建议被确定为专家共识。指南适用于所有涉及该主题的医生,无论其专业培训或兴趣如何,旨在指出特定问题的优选但不一定是唯一可接受的方法。指南旨在具有灵活性,必须与护理标准区分开来,后者是僵化的,很少被违反。鉴于任何医疗保健问题都存在广泛的具体情况,医生必须始终选择最适合个体患者的方案,并考虑决策时存在的变量。指南是在美国胃肠病学学会及其实践参数委员会的主持下制定的,并由董事会批准。每个指南都经过委员会、该领域的其他专家、将使用它们的医生以及决策分析科学的专家的严格审查和修订。因此,在编写时,基于可用数据,每个指南的建议被认为是有效的。与每个指南相关的医学研究和实践的新进展将在发布时确定并指出的时间进行审查,以确保持续有效性。所提出的建议是基于发现的证据水平。A级建议意味着存在一致的 1 级证据(随机对照试验),B 级表示证据将是 2 级或 3 级,即队列研究或病例对照研究。C 级建议基于 4 级研究,即病例系列或低质量队列研究,D 级建议基于 5 级证据,即专家意见。