Portugal J, Waring M J
University of Cambridge, Department of Pharmacology, U.K.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Feb 28;949(2):158-68. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(88)90079-6.
DNA binding sites for the minor groove-binding ligands DAPI (4',6-diamidine-2-phenylindole) and Hoechst 33258 (bisbenzimide) have been analysed using DNAase I and micrococcal nuclease footprinting techniques. Both drugs appear to bind to AT-rich regions containing at least four such basepairs. Hoechst 33258 seems to bind relatively poorly to nucleotide sequences containing the alternating step TpA. However, in contrast to DAPI, it can more readily accommodate the presence of guanosine residues at the end of the binding site. We compare the DNA binding sites for DAPI and Hoechst 33258 with those determined for the related minor groove-binding ligands, berenil, netropsin and distamycin A, under comparable conditions, and discuss the importance of using different footprinting probes when analysing drug-DNA interactions.
已使用脱氧核糖核酸酶I和微球菌核酸酶足迹技术分析了小沟结合配体4',6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚(DAPI)和双苯并咪唑(Hoechst 33258)的DNA结合位点。两种药物似乎都与富含AT的区域结合,这些区域至少包含四个这样的碱基对。Hoechst 33258与含有交替步移TpA的核苷酸序列结合相对较差。然而,与DAPI不同的是,它能更容易地适应结合位点末端鸟苷残基的存在。我们在可比条件下将DAPI和Hoechst 33258的DNA结合位点与相关小沟结合配体贝尼尔、纺锤菌素和Distamycin A所确定的结合位点进行了比较,并讨论了在分析药物与DNA相互作用时使用不同足迹探针的重要性。