Härd T, Fan P, Kearns D R
Department of Chemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92037-0342.
Photochem Photobiol. 1990 Jan;51(1):77-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb01686.x.
We have studied the time-resolved and the steady-state fluorescence of the DNA groove binders 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and Hoechst 33258 with the double stranded DNAs poly(dA-dU) and poly(dI-dC) and their halogenated analogs, poly(dA-I5dU) and poly(dI-Br5dC). These studies were prompted by earlier observations that steady-state fluorescence of Hoechst 33258 is quenched on binding to halogenated DNAs (presumably due to an intermolecular heavy atom effect involving the halogen atom in the major groove), and recent studies which clearly point to a binding-site in the minor groove of DNA. Measurements of the time resolved fluorescence decay demonstrate that the fluorescence of Hoechst 33258 is quenched on binding to the halogenated DNAs, in agreement with previous observations. However, quenching studies carried out using the free halogenated bases IdUrd and BrdCyd in solution yielded bimolecular rate constants more than one order of magnitude larger than those expected for an intermolecular heavy atom effect. Moreover, the quenching of the Hoechst 33258 fluorescence was accompanied by an accelerated photochemical destruction of Hoechst 33258. We therefore conclude that the fluorescence quenching observed with halogenated DNAs is probably due to a photochemical reaction involving Hoechst 33258, rather than direct contact of Hoechst 33258 with the halogen substituents in the major groove of the DNA. The fluorescence decay measurements however, do provide clear evidence for at least two different modes of binding. Taking into account the alternating sequences used in this study and the possibility of two different conformations for bound dye, at least four different modes of binding are plausible. Our present data do not allow us to distinguish between these alternatives. The time-resolved fluorescence decays and fluorescence quantum yields of DAPI are not affected by the presence of the heavy atom substituents in the DNA major groove. Based on this observation and earlier reports that DAPI binds in one of the DNA grooves, we conclude that the high affinity sites for DAPI on DNA are located in the minor groove.
我们研究了DNA沟结合剂4',6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚(DAPI)和Hoechst 33258与双链DNA多聚(dA-dU)和多聚(dI-dC)及其卤代类似物多聚(dA-I5dU)和多聚(dI-Br5dC)的时间分辨荧光和稳态荧光。这些研究是由早期的观察结果引发的,即Hoechst 33258与卤代DNA结合时稳态荧光会淬灭(可能是由于涉及大沟中卤原子的分子间重原子效应),以及最近的研究明确指出DNA小沟中有一个结合位点。时间分辨荧光衰减的测量表明,Hoechst 33258与卤代DNA结合时荧光会淬灭,这与之前的观察结果一致。然而,使用溶液中的游离卤代碱基IdUrd和BrdCyd进行的淬灭研究得到的双分子速率常数比分子间重原子效应预期的大一个多数量级。此外,Hoechst 33258荧光的淬灭伴随着Hoechst 33258光化学破坏的加速。因此,我们得出结论,卤代DNA观察到的荧光淬灭可能是由于涉及Hoechst 33258的光化学反应,而不是Hoechst 33258与DNA大沟中卤代取代基的直接接触。然而,荧光衰减测量确实为至少两种不同的结合模式提供了明确的证据。考虑到本研究中使用的交替序列以及结合染料的两种不同构象的可能性,至少有四种不同的结合模式是合理的。我们目前的数据不允许我们区分这些可能性。DNA大沟中重原子取代基的存在不会影响DAPI的时间分辨荧光衰减和荧光量子产率。基于这一观察结果以及早期报道DAPI结合在DNA的一个沟中,我们得出结论,DAPI在DNA上的高亲和力位点位于小沟中。