学习障碍、头部受伤的年轻人以及正常年轻人中语音拼写不准确的情况。

Phonetically inaccurate spelling among learning-disabled, head-injured, and nondisabled young adults.

作者信息

Horn J L, O'Donnell J P, Leicht D J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale 62901.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1988 Jan;33(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90054-5.

DOI:10.1016/0093-934x(88)90054-5

PMID:2449261

Abstract

We applied the Boder and Jarrico (1982, The Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns, New York: Grune & Stratton) criteria to the WRAT spelling list and examined the phonetically inaccurate spelling error patterns of learning-disabled (LD), head-injured (HI), and nondisabled young adults. Phonetically inaccurate (PI) errors were reliably rated (interrater r = .94) and were correlated significantly more strongly with dysphasic errors (r = .33) than with dyscopia (r = .16). ANOVA showed that LD and HI, which did not differ, made significantly more PI errors than both nondisabled and HI. These results indicate that PI errors reflect an underlying language disorder. The results also suggest that PI errors are more frequent in brain-related disorders. Finally, when group differences in cognitive ability are statistically controlled, PI errors are more common only among LD persons.

摘要

我们将博德和贾里科（1982年，《阅读-拼写模式的博德测试》，纽约：格鲁恩与斯特拉顿出版社）的标准应用于WRAT拼写列表，并研究了学习障碍（LD）、头部受伤（HI）和非残疾青年成年人在语音上不准确的拼写错误模式。语音不准确（PI）错误得到了可靠的评分（评分者间相关系数r = 0.94），并且与言语困难错误（r = 0.33）的相关性显著强于与书写困难（r = 0.16）的相关性。方差分析表明，没有差异的LD组和HI组在PI错误上显著多于非残疾组和HI组。这些结果表明PI错误反映了一种潜在的语言障碍。结果还表明PI错误在与大脑相关的障碍中更为常见。最后，当在统计上控制认知能力的组间差异时，PI错误仅在LD人群中更为常见。