Suppr超能文献

比较生化检测与其他方法在检测伊朗国家细胞库中人及动物细胞系支原体污染中的敏感性。

Sensitivity of biochemical test in comparison with other methods for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in human and animal cell lines stored in the National Cell Bank of Iran.

机构信息

National Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Cytotechnology. 2014 Oct;66(5):861-73. doi: 10.1007/s10616-013-9640-9. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

Abstract

Mycoplasma contamination in cell culture is considered as serious problem in the manufacturing of biological products. Our goal in this research is to find the best standard and rapid method with high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and predictive values of positive and negative results for detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures of the National Cell Bank of Iran. In this study, 40 cell lines suspected to mycoplasma contamination were evaluated by three different methods: microbial culture, enzymatic mycoalert(®) and molecular. Enzymatic evaluation was performed using the mycoalert(®) kit while in the molecular technique, a universal primer pair was designed based on the common and fixed 16SrRNA ribosomal sequences used. Mycoplasma contaminations in cell cultures with molecular, enzymatic and microbial culture methods were determined as 57.5, 52.5 and 40 %, respectively. These results confirmed the higher rate of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the molecular method in comparison with enzymatic and microbial methods. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay based on fixed and common sequences in the 16SrRNA, is a useful valuable and reliable technique with high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures and other biological products. The enzymatic mycoalert(®) method can be considered as a substitution for conventional microbial culture and DNA staining fluorochrome methods due to its higher sensitivity, specificity and speed of detection (<20 min).

摘要

支原体污染被认为是生物制品生产中的一个严重问题。我们的研究目标是找到一种最佳的标准和快速方法,具有高灵敏度、特异性、准确性和正负预测值,用于检测伊朗国家细胞库中细胞培养物中的支原体污染。在这项研究中,三种不同的方法评估了 40 株疑似支原体污染的细胞系:微生物培养、酶法 mycoalert(®)和分子方法。酶法评估使用 mycoalert(®)试剂盒进行,而在分子技术中,根据通用和固定的 16SrRNA 核糖体序列设计了一对通用引物。用分子、酶和微生物培养方法检测细胞培养物中的支原体污染分别为 57.5%、52.5%和 40%。这些结果证实了与酶法和微生物法相比,分子法具有更高的灵敏度、特异性和准确性。基于 16SrRNA 中固定和通用序列的聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测是一种有用的、有价值的和可靠的技术,具有高灵敏度、特异性和准确性,可用于检测细胞培养物和其他生物制品中的支原体污染。由于其较高的灵敏度、特异性和检测速度(<20 分钟),酶法 mycoalert(®)方法可以替代传统的微生物培养和 DNA 染色荧光法。

相似文献

3
Rapid detection of mycoplasma in continuous cell lines using a selective biochemical test.
Leuk Res. 2008 Feb;32(2):323-6. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
4
Detection of Mycoplasma Contamination of Cell Culture by A Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method.
Cell J. 2019 Apr;21(1):43-48. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2019.5624. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
5
Validation of nested PCR and a selective biochemical method as alternatives for mycoplasma detection.
J Basic Microbiol. 2011 Apr;51(2):215-9. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201000066. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
6
Detection of mycoplasma in leukemia-lymphoma cell lines using polymerase chain reaction.
Leukemia. 2002 Feb;16(2):289-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402365.
8
Performance of PCR-based and Bioluminescent assays for mycoplasma detection.
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Nov;118:31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
10
Detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures by a mycoplasma group-specific PCR.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Jan;60(1):149-52. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.1.149-152.1994.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative genomic analysis of Mycoplasma related to cell culture for infB gene-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023 Oct 25;39(12):355. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03794-y.
2
Development of a novel and specialized cultivation method for isolating from chicken meat.
Iran J Vet Res. 2021 Winter;22(1):76-80. doi: 10.22099/ijvr.2020.38193.5560.
4
Direct qPCR is a sensitive approach to detect Mycoplasma contamination in U937 cell cultures.
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Nov 1;12(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4763-5.
6
Cell lines authentication and mycoplasma detection as minimun quality control of cell lines in biobanking.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2017 Jun;18(2):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s10561-017-9617-6. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevention and detection of Mycoplasma contamination in cell culture.
Cell J. 2012 Winter;13(4):203-12. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
2
Validation of a multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR ELISA for the detection of 19 respiratory tract pathogens.
Infection. 2013 Feb;41(1):77-91. doi: 10.1007/s15010-012-0298-6. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
4
Sensitive and Specific Detection of Mycoplasma species by Consensus Polymerase Chain Reaction and Dot Blot Hybridization.
Lab Anim Res. 2011 Jun;27(2):141-5. doi: 10.5625/lar.2011.27.2.141. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
5
Preparation of reference strains for validation and comparison of mycoplasma testing methods.
J Appl Microbiol. 2011 Oct;111(4):904-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05108.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
6
Detecting mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures by polymerase chain reaction.
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;731:93-103. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-080-5_8.
7
Mycoplasma testing of cell substrates and biologics: Review of alternative non-microbiological techniques.
Mol Cell Probes. 2011 Apr-Jun;25(2-3):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell substrates using reverse transcription-PCR assays.
J Appl Microbiol. 2011 Jan;110(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04853.x. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
9
Validation of nested PCR and a selective biochemical method as alternatives for mycoplasma detection.
J Basic Microbiol. 2011 Apr;51(2):215-9. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201000066. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
10
Detection of Mycoplasma in cell cultures.
Nat Protoc. 2010 May;5(5):929-34. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.43. Epub 2010 Apr 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验