Ziaaddini Hassan, Nasirian Mansooreh, Nakhaee Nouzar
Associate Professor, Kerman Neuroscience Research Center and School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Psychiatrist, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Addict Health. 2010 Winter-Spring;2(1-2):18-24.
This study compared the success rates of buprenorphine and clonidine in detoxification of heroin-dependents and evaluated the recurrence of drug abuse in patients taking naltrexone in a 6 month follow up.
A double-blind study was carried out in Kerman's psychiatric hospital on heroin-dependents seeking detoxification during the years 2007-2009.These patients were randomized into 2 groups receiving clonidine and buprenorphine. The success rate of detoxification was evaluated at the end of the trial and each patient was discharged with a daily consumption of 25 mg naltrexone. They were monitored for 6 months with respect to naltrexone consumption and withdrawal from drug abuse.
Overall 49 patients participated in the study. The success rate of detoxification with naltrexone was confirmed in all subjects. In the group receiving clonidine, 2 subjects (9.5%) had a clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) above 12 in day 5 (P=0.186) and none of the subjects in the group taking buprenorphine had a COWS above 12 in day 5. The signs and symptoms of withdrawal and the desire for substance abuse was declined significantly in both groups over time; 19% of subjects detoxified with clonidine and 39% detoxified with buprenorphine continued taking naltrexone for one month and 52% detoxified with clonidine and 53.5% detoxified with buprenorphine entered the maintenance treatment. The average days remaining in treatment and being free of recurrence of drug abuse was not significantly different between the two groups in a 6 month follow-up.
Administration of buprenorphine within a few days was more efficient in reducing the signs and symptoms of withdrawal when compared to clonidine. However, recurrence of drug abuse was not significantly different between the two groups.
本研究比较了丁丙诺啡和可乐定在海洛因依赖者戒毒中的成功率,并在6个月的随访中评估了服用纳曲酮患者的药物滥用复发情况。
2007年至2009年期间,在克尔曼精神病院对寻求戒毒的海洛因依赖者进行了一项双盲研究。这些患者被随机分为两组,分别接受可乐定和丁丙诺啡治疗。在试验结束时评估戒毒成功率,每位患者出院时每天服用25毫克纳曲酮。对他们进行了6个月的监测,观察纳曲酮的服用情况以及是否戒除药物滥用。
共有49名患者参与了该研究。所有受试者使用纳曲酮的戒毒成功率均得到证实。在接受可乐定治疗的组中,有2名受试者(9.5%)在第5天的临床阿片戒断量表(COWS)得分高于12分(P = 0.186),而在服用丁丙诺啡的组中,没有受试者在第5天的COWS得分高于12分。随着时间的推移,两组的戒断症状和药物滥用欲望均显著下降;可乐定戒毒组中19%、丁丙诺啡戒毒组中39%的患者持续服用纳曲酮1个月,可乐定戒毒组中52%、丁丙诺啡戒毒组中53.5%的患者进入维持治疗。在6个月的随访中,两组在治疗持续时间和无药物滥用复发方面的平均天数没有显著差异。
与可乐定相比,在几天内使用丁丙诺啡在减轻戒断症状方面更有效。然而,两组之间的药物滥用复发率没有显著差异。