Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚NEPOD项目中五种海洛因脱毒方法的短期结果。

Short-term outcomes of five heroin detoxification methods in the Australian NEPOD Project.

作者信息

Digiusto Erol, Lintzeris Nicholas, Breen Courtney, Kimber Jo, Mattick Richard P, Bell James, Ali Robert, Saunders John B

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2005 Mar;30(3):443-56. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.06.002.

Abstract

This study included 380 participants in five heroin detoxification trials whose data were pooled to enable direct comparison of five detoxification methods in the Australian National Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Dependence (NEPOD). Rapid detoxification achieved similar initial abstinence rates with either anaesthesia or sedation (average 59%), which were higher than was achieved by inpatient detoxification using clonidine plus other symptomatic medications (24%), which in turn was higher than outpatient detoxification using either buprenorphine (12%) or clonidine plus other symptomatic medications (4%). Older participants and those using more illicit drugs were more likely to achieve abstinence. Entry rates into ongoing postdetoxification treatment were as follows: buprenorphine outpatient (65%), sedation (63%), anaesthesia (42%), symptomatic outpatient (27%), and symptomatic inpatient (12%). Postdetoxification treatment with buprenorphine or methadone was preferred over naltrexone. Participants with more previous detoxification attempts were more likely to enter postdetoxification treatment. Given that outpatient detoxification was more effective with buprenorphine than with symptomatic medications and that rapid detoxification was more effective than the symptomatic inpatient method, the roles of the symptomatic methods should be reconsidered.

摘要

本研究纳入了五项海洛因脱毒试验中的380名参与者,其数据被汇总起来,以便在澳大利亚阿片类药物依赖药物治疗国家评估(NEPOD)中直接比较五种脱毒方法。快速脱毒在使用麻醉或镇静的情况下实现了相似的初始戒断率(平均59%),高于使用可乐定加其他对症药物的住院脱毒(24%),而住院脱毒又高于使用丁丙诺啡(12%)或可乐定加其他对症药物的门诊脱毒(4%)。年龄较大的参与者和使用更多非法药物的参与者更有可能实现戒断。进入后续脱毒后治疗的比例如下:丁丙诺啡门诊治疗(65%)、镇静(63%)、麻醉(42%)、对症门诊治疗(27%)和对症住院治疗(12%)。丁丙诺啡或美沙酮的脱毒后治疗比纳曲酮更受青睐。之前有更多脱毒尝试的参与者更有可能进入脱毒后治疗。鉴于丁丙诺啡门诊脱毒比对症药物更有效,且快速脱毒比对症住院方法更有效,应重新考虑对症方法的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验