Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, Waterford Regional Hospital, Waterford, Ireland.
Sector of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Apr;5(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
Prostate cancer is a disease of older men. Weekly docetaxel (DPq1w) is often favored over the standard three-weekly regimen (DPq3w) due to concerns about safety and tolerability in this population.
Two subgroup analyses of TAX 327 were conducted. Among patients receiving DPq3w, tolerability and efficacy were compared between three age groups: <65, 65-74 and ≥75 years. For men ≥75 years, these outcomes were compared between DPq3w, DPq1w, and mitoxantrone (MP) arms. Tolerability outcomes included dose delivery, grade 3/4 adverse events and quality of life. Efficacy outcomes included overall survival and tumor response.
Of 1006 men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the trial, 335 received DPq3w. Among these, 20% were age ≥75 years. For DPq3w, there were non-significant associations of worse tolerability and efficacy with advancing age. Twenty-eight percent of men age ≥75 years had an objective pain response, compared to 38% and 34% of patients 65-74 and <65 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (43-48%, p = 0.74) or measurable tumor response (7-17%, p = 0.30) according to age. Among men ≥75 years, DPq3w resulted in more dose reductions than DPq1w (22% versus 8%, p = 0.007), but tolerability was otherwise comparable. Both were associated with more favorable efficacy than mitoxantrone.
Tolerability and efficacy of DPq3w appear less favorable with advancing age. Compared to DPq1w, DPq3w is associated with better survival outcomes, but similar tolerability, and remains the standard first-line chemotherapy option in mCRPC. Toxicity is substantial, therefore careful patient selection, close monitoring and early management of toxicities is advised.
前列腺癌是一种老年男性疾病。由于担心在这一人群中的安全性和耐受性问题,每周多西他赛(DPq1w)治疗方案通常优于标准的三周治疗方案(DPq3w)。
对 TAX 327 进行了两项亚组分析。在接受 DPq3w 治疗的患者中,<65 岁、65-74 岁和≥75 岁三个年龄组之间比较了耐受性和疗效。对于≥75 岁的男性,比较了 DPq3w、DPq1w 和米托蒽醌(MP)组之间的这些结局。耐受性结局包括剂量给予、3/4 级不良事件和生活质量。疗效结局包括总生存期和肿瘤反应。
在这项试验中,1006 名转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中,335 名患者接受 DPq3w 治疗。其中,20%的患者年龄≥75 岁。对于 DPq3w,随着年龄的增长,耐受性和疗效的恶化没有显著相关性。28%的≥75 岁男性有客观疼痛反应,而 65-74 岁和<65 岁的患者分别为 38%和 34%。根据年龄,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应(43-48%,p=0.74)或可测量肿瘤反应(7-17%,p=0.30)无显著差异。在≥75 岁的男性中,DPq3w 导致的剂量减少比 DPq1w 更多(22%比 8%,p=0.007),但耐受性否则相当。与米托蒽醌相比,两者均与更有利的疗效相关。
随着年龄的增长,DPq3w 的耐受性和疗效似乎较差。与 DPq1w 相比,DPq3w 与更好的生存结果相关,但耐受性相似,并且仍然是 mCRPC 的标准一线化疗选择。毒性是实质性的,因此建议仔细选择患者,密切监测和早期管理毒性。