Hansen Jens Georg
Rosenlunden 9, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Dan Med J. 2014 Feb;61(2):B4801.
The idea behind this thesis is to present how ARS and especially acute maxillary sinusitis in adults is diagnosed and treated in general practice. The study extends over many years, beginning with the first survey in 1991. Based on doctors' answers, we then investigated the diagnostic values of the symptoms, signs and examinations which the doctors reported using. All patients over 18 years suspected of acute maxillary sinusitis were included consecutively and only once and, after a clinical examination with the GP, they were offered the opportunity to enter into the prospective study referred to acute CT scan and by changes in the CT, immediately referred to sinus puncture. Both examinations were conducted at Aalborg Hospital. The disease was found most frequently in younger and 2/3 were women. The reason for this gender difference is unknown. We have assessed the diagnostic values of the symptoms, objective findings and investigations using 3 different reference standards: sinus puncture, microbiological diagnosis and CT scan described in three articles. In all examinations, it appeared that the usual signs and symptoms of acute maxillary sinusitis occur almost equally often and with a few exceptions in patients, with and without pus in the sinus cavities. Pain in the sinus cavities occurring in 95% of patients, and only elevated levels of CRP and ESR are significantly and independently associated with pus in the sinus cavities. This finding is surprising, because they are two nonspecific markers. CRP tested by near-patient testing has, within the investigations period, been introduced in general practice, and from 1999 the doctors also get reimbursed for performing the test. We have on this background originally defined a clinical criterion with pain over the sinuses accompanied by elevated values of CRP and/or ESR giving a sensitivity of 0.82, specificity 0.57, ppv 0.68 and npv 0.74. But looking at the ROC curve we suggest that a more clinical relevant diagnose will be based on use of CRP alone, as the test can be made easily and fast while the patient is in the clinic compared to the use of ESR. The disease is over-diagnosed in general practice. In only 53% of patients, who the GP suspected of having acute sinusitis, was there detected pus or mucopus at the sinus puncture, furthermore the patients' statements that they had had sinusitis was significantly negatively associated with current acute maxillary sinusitis. Almost all patients are prescribed topical treatment to the nose in the form of vasoconstrictor, and 50-70% also antibiotics. The most common bacteria that can be isolated are S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. For many years the first drug of choice has been penicillin V, and treatment with penicillin V has followed Scandinavian recommendations. However, the resistance patterns in respect of H. influenzae have changed over the years and if the dominant flora is H. influenzae, then oral penicillin is not sufficient anymore, and should be replaced by amoxicillin with or without clavulanate. It is reported that the MIC of penicillin V is too high, such that oral dosage cannot provide sufficiently high concentrations. However, in daily clinical practice the doctor does not have the possibility to decide whether the infection is caused by either S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae, unless a sinus puncture is performed and it is not considered as a standard procedure. The recommended treatment is therefore starting with penicillin V, and at treatment failure switching to amoxicillin with or without clavulanate. It is well known that URTI's can exacerbate a chronic pulmonary disease - like asthma - in allergic patients, but this influence is also demonstrated as described in article 6 where ARS in adults without any sign of chronic lung disease or allergy is accompanied by a temporary reduction lung function. Future research should focus on the use of CRP in general practice, analysing cost-effectiveness of the use of CRP patient outcome in relation to antibiotic treatment, clarification of ARS as a female disease, and a detailed exploration of the relationship between URTI's and impaired lung function in lung-healthy patients.
本论文的目的是介绍在全科医疗中成人急性鼻-鼻窦炎(ARS)尤其是急性上颌窦炎的诊断和治疗方法。该研究跨越多年,始于1991年的首次调查。基于医生的回答,我们随后调查了医生报告所使用的症状、体征和检查的诊断价值。所有18岁以上疑似急性上颌窦炎的患者被连续纳入且仅纳入一次,在与全科医生进行临床检查后,他们有机会参与一项前瞻性研究,该研究涉及急性CT扫描,并根据CT变化,立即进行鼻窦穿刺。两项检查均在奥尔堡医院进行。该疾病在年轻人中最为常见,且三分之二为女性。这种性别差异的原因尚不清楚。我们使用三种不同的参考标准评估了症状、客观发现和检查的诊断价值:鼻窦穿刺、微生物诊断以及三篇文章中描述的CT扫描。在所有检查中,似乎急性上颌窦炎的常见体征和症状在有和没有鼻窦腔脓液的患者中几乎同样频繁出现,仅有少数例外。鼻窦腔疼痛出现在95%的患者中,并且只有CRP和ESR水平升高与鼻窦腔脓液显著且独立相关。这一发现令人惊讶,因为它们是两个非特异性标志物。在研究期间,通过即时检验进行的CRP检测已在全科医疗中引入,并且从1999年起医生进行该项检测也可获得报销。在此背景下,我们最初定义了一个临床标准,即鼻窦疼痛伴有CRP和/或ESR值升高,其敏感性为0.82,特异性为0.57,阳性预测值为0.68,阴性预测值为0.74。但从ROC曲线来看,我们认为一个更具临床相关性的诊断将仅基于CRP的使用,因为与ESR相比,该检测可以在患者就诊时轻松快速地进行。在全科医疗中该疾病存在过度诊断的情况。在全科医生怀疑患有急性鼻窦炎的患者中,只有53%在鼻窦穿刺时检测到脓液或黏脓性分泌物,此外,患者自述曾患鼻窦炎与当前急性上颌窦炎显著负相关。几乎所有患者都接受了以血管收缩剂形式的鼻腔局部治疗,50 - 70%的患者还使用了抗生素。最常分离出的细菌是肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌。多年来首选药物一直是青霉素V,并且青霉素V的治疗遵循斯堪的纳维亚的建议。然而,多年来流感嗜血杆菌的耐药模式已经发生变化,如果优势菌群是流感嗜血杆菌,那么口服青霉素就不再足够,应该用阿莫西林加或不加克拉维酸替代。据报道,青霉素V的最低抑菌浓度过高,以至于口服剂量无法提供足够高的浓度。然而,在日常临床实践中,医生没有办法确定感染是由肺炎链球菌还是流感嗜血杆菌引起的,除非进行鼻窦穿刺,而这并不被视为标准程序。因此推荐的治疗方法是首先使用青霉素V,治疗失败后改用阿莫西林加或不加克拉维酸。众所周知,上呼吸道感染(URTI)会使过敏性患者的慢性肺部疾病如哮喘加重,但如第6篇文章所述,这种影响也有所体现,即没有任何慢性肺部疾病或过敏迹象的成人急性鼻-鼻窦炎会伴有肺功能的暂时下降。未来的研究应聚焦于CRP在全科医疗中的应用,分析使用CRP的成本效益与抗生素治疗对患者预后的关系,阐明急性鼻-鼻窦炎作为女性疾病的情况,以及详细探究上呼吸道感染与肺部健康患者肺功能受损之间的关系。