Suppr超能文献

拟用于初级保健中诊断成人急性鼻-鼻窦炎的临床决策规则。

Proposed Clinical Decision Rules to Diagnose Acute Rhinosinusitis Among Adults in Primary Care.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jul;15(4):347-354. doi: 10.1370/afm.2060.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, we sought to develop a clinical decision rule for the diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

METHODS

Multivariate analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis were used to develop clinical decision rules for the diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis, defined using 3 different reference standards (purulent antral puncture fluid or abnormal finding on a computed tomographic (CT) scan; for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, we used a positive bacterial culture of antral fluid). Signs, symptoms, C-reactive protein (CRP), and reference standard tests were prospectively recorded in 175 Danish patients aged 18 to 65 years seeking care for suspected acute rhinosinusitis. For each reference standard, we developed 2 clinical decision rules: a point score based on a logistic regression model and an algorithm based on a CART model. We identified low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups for acute rhinosinusitis or acute bacterial rhinosinusitis for each clinical decision rule.

RESULTS

The point scores each had between 5 and 6 predictors, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) between 0.721 and 0.767. For positive bacterial culture as the reference standard, low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups had a 16%, 49%, and 73% likelihood of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, respectively. CART models had an AUROCC ranging from 0.783 to 0.827. For positive bacterial culture as the reference standard, low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups had a likelihood of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis of 6%, 31%, and 59% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a series of clinical decision rules integrating signs, symptoms, and CRP to diagnose acute rhinosinusitis and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis with good accuracy. They now require prospective validation and an assessment of their effect on clinical and process outcomes.

摘要

目的

为减少不适当的抗生素处方,我们旨在制定一个急性鼻-鼻窦炎和急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的临床诊断规则。

方法

采用多变量分析和分类回归树(CART)分析,为急性鼻-鼻窦炎的诊断制定临床决策规则,使用 3 种不同的参考标准(脓性窦腔穿刺液或计算机断层扫描(CT)异常发现;急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎采用窦腔液的阳性细菌培养)来定义。对 175 名年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的丹麦患者进行前瞻性记录,这些患者因疑似急性鼻-鼻窦炎就诊。对于每种参考标准,我们制定了 2 种临床决策规则:基于逻辑回归模型的评分点和基于 CART 模型的算法。我们为每个临床决策规则确定了急性鼻-鼻窦炎或急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的低、中、高危人群。

结果

评分点各有 5 至 6 个预测因素,接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROCC)为 0.721 至 0.767。以阳性细菌培养为参考标准,低、中、高危组急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的可能性分别为 16%、49%和 73%。CART 模型的 AUROCC 范围为 0.783 至 0.827。以阳性细菌培养为参考标准,低、中、高危组急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的可能性分别为 6%、31%和 59%。

结论

我们制定了一系列整合体征、症状和 CRP 的临床决策规则,以准确诊断急性鼻-鼻窦炎和急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎。它们现在需要前瞻性验证,并评估它们对临床和流程结果的影响。

相似文献

10
Anterior rhinoscopy and middle meatal culture in acute rhinosinusitis.急性鼻-鼻窦炎的前鼻镜检查及中鼻道培养
J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Nov;127(11):1088-92. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113002326. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

6
Limiting Antibiotic Use in Acute Sinusitis: Partly a Matter of Vocabulary?限制急性鼻窦炎中的抗生素使用:部分是词汇问题?
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2018 Jul 30;5(3):193-195. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1646. eCollection 2018 Summer.
9
Antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis in adults.成人急性鼻窦炎的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;9(9):CD006089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006089.pub5.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验