Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jul;15(4):347-354. doi: 10.1370/afm.2060.
To reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, we sought to develop a clinical decision rule for the diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.
Multivariate analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis were used to develop clinical decision rules for the diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis, defined using 3 different reference standards (purulent antral puncture fluid or abnormal finding on a computed tomographic (CT) scan; for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, we used a positive bacterial culture of antral fluid). Signs, symptoms, C-reactive protein (CRP), and reference standard tests were prospectively recorded in 175 Danish patients aged 18 to 65 years seeking care for suspected acute rhinosinusitis. For each reference standard, we developed 2 clinical decision rules: a point score based on a logistic regression model and an algorithm based on a CART model. We identified low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups for acute rhinosinusitis or acute bacterial rhinosinusitis for each clinical decision rule.
The point scores each had between 5 and 6 predictors, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) between 0.721 and 0.767. For positive bacterial culture as the reference standard, low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups had a 16%, 49%, and 73% likelihood of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, respectively. CART models had an AUROCC ranging from 0.783 to 0.827. For positive bacterial culture as the reference standard, low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups had a likelihood of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis of 6%, 31%, and 59% respectively.
We have developed a series of clinical decision rules integrating signs, symptoms, and CRP to diagnose acute rhinosinusitis and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis with good accuracy. They now require prospective validation and an assessment of their effect on clinical and process outcomes.
为减少不适当的抗生素处方,我们旨在制定一个急性鼻-鼻窦炎和急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的临床诊断规则。
采用多变量分析和分类回归树(CART)分析,为急性鼻-鼻窦炎的诊断制定临床决策规则,使用 3 种不同的参考标准(脓性窦腔穿刺液或计算机断层扫描(CT)异常发现;急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎采用窦腔液的阳性细菌培养)来定义。对 175 名年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的丹麦患者进行前瞻性记录,这些患者因疑似急性鼻-鼻窦炎就诊。对于每种参考标准,我们制定了 2 种临床决策规则:基于逻辑回归模型的评分点和基于 CART 模型的算法。我们为每个临床决策规则确定了急性鼻-鼻窦炎或急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的低、中、高危人群。
评分点各有 5 至 6 个预测因素,接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROCC)为 0.721 至 0.767。以阳性细菌培养为参考标准,低、中、高危组急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的可能性分别为 16%、49%和 73%。CART 模型的 AUROCC 范围为 0.783 至 0.827。以阳性细菌培养为参考标准,低、中、高危组急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的可能性分别为 6%、31%和 59%。
我们制定了一系列整合体征、症状和 CRP 的临床决策规则,以准确诊断急性鼻-鼻窦炎和急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎。它们现在需要前瞻性验证,并评估它们对临床和流程结果的影响。