• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无导线超声心内膜左心室再同步起搏治疗心力衰竭患者的可行性、安全性和短期疗效:无线刺激心内膜 CRT(WiSE-CRT)研究结果。

Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Via Tesserete 48, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland.

出版信息

Europace. 2014 May;16(5):681-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut435. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1093/europace/eut435
PMID:24497573
Abstract

AIMS

Left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing may address the limitations in the selection of an LV pacing site and provide improvements in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) effectiveness. We report on the feasibility, the safety, and the short-term outcome of a leadless ultrasound-based technology for LV endocardial resynchronization in heart failure (HF) patients enroled into the Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventeen HF patients were enroled and categorized as: (i) patients in whom attempted coronary sinus lead implantation for CRT had failed (n = 7); (ii) patients with a previously implanted CRT device, not responding to CRT (n = 2); and (iii) patients with previously implanted pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and meeting the standard indications for CRT (n = 8). System implantation was achieved in 13 patients (76.5%); mean R-wave amplitude was 5.6 ± 3.2 mV and the mean pacing threshold was 1.6 ± 1.0 V, respectively. In one patient, no sufficient pacing thresholds were found; in three patients pericardial effusion occurred. Biventricular pacing was recorded in 83% and 92% of the patients at 1 month and 6 months, respectively. QRS duration was shorter during biventricular pacing compared with right ventricular pacing at 1 month (-41 ms; P = 0.0002) and 6 months (-42 ms; P = 0.0011), respectively. At the 6-month follow-up, two-thirds of the patients had at least one functional class change. Left ventricular ejection fraction significantly increased (P < 0.01) by 6 points at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility of providing an endocardial stimulation for CRT with a leadless technology was successfully demonstrated. Despite the promising results for a novel technology, further study is required to definitively conclude the safety and the performance of the system.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

NCT01294527.

摘要

目的

左心室(LV)心内膜起搏可以解决 LV 起搏部位选择的局限性,并提高心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的效果。我们报告了一项用于心力衰竭(HF)患者的无导线超声心内膜 LV 再同步治疗(WiSE-CRT)研究中,一种基于无导线技术的 LV 心内膜再同步的可行性、安全性和短期结果。

方法和结果

共纳入 17 例 HF 患者,并分为以下几类:(i)尝试进行 CRT 的冠状窦导线植入失败的患者(n=7);(ii)对 CRT 无反应且已植入 CRT 设备的患者(n=2);和(iii)已植入起搏器或植入式心脏除颤器且符合 CRT 标准适应证的患者(n=8)。在 13 例患者(76.5%)中实现了系统植入;平均 R 波振幅为 5.6±3.2 mV,平均起搏阈值为 1.6±1.0 V。在 1 例患者中未发现足够的起搏阈值,在 3 例患者中出现心包积液。1 个月和 6 个月时,分别有 83%和 92%的患者记录到双心室起搏。与右心室起搏相比,1 个月(-41 ms;P=0.0002)和 6 个月(-42 ms;P=0.0011)时双心室起搏时 QRS 持续时间更短。在 6 个月的随访中,三分之二的患者至少有一次功能分级变化。6 个月随访时,左心室射血分数显著增加(P<0.01),增加了 6 个百分点。

结论

使用无导线技术提供 CRT 心内膜刺激的可行性已成功得到证实。尽管这项新技术有很有前景,但仍需要进一步的研究来确定该系统的安全性和性能。

临床试验注册信息

NCT01294527。

相似文献

1
Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.无导线超声心内膜左心室再同步起搏治疗心力衰竭患者的可行性、安全性和短期疗效:无线刺激心内膜 CRT(WiSE-CRT)研究结果。
Europace. 2014 May;16(5):681-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut435. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
2
First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.首例无导线超声心脏起搏系统植入:心力衰竭患者的新型心内膜左心室再同步治疗。
Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1191-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut124. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Wireless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing: The SELECT-LV Study.无线左心室心内膜起搏的心脏再同步治疗:SELECT-LV 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 2;69(17):2119-2129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.059.
4
Real-world experience of leadless left ventricular endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter international registry of the WiSE-CRT pacing system.无导线左心室心脏再同步治疗的真实世界经验:WiSE-CRT 起搏系统的多中心国际注册研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Aug;17(8):1291-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Evaluation of wireless stimulation of the endocardium, WiSE, technology for treatment heart failure.用于治疗心力衰竭的心内膜无线刺激技术(WiSE)的评估。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Jun;13(6):523-31. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1187559. Epub 2016 May 20.
6
Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.右室间隔部起搏作为心脏再同步治疗候选者中左心室起搏导线植入失败的替代方法。
Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):94-100. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu259. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
7
Transseptal left ventricular endocardial pacing: preliminary experience from a femoral approach with subclavian pull-through.经房间隔左心室心内膜起搏:经锁骨下经股静脉推送入路的初步经验。
Europace. 2011 Oct;13(10):1454-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur136. Epub 2011 May 11.
8
Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial.在 TRUST CRT 随机试验的一项子研究中,观察到在接受三部位心脏再同步治疗的患者中,1 年随访期间的植入可行性、与手术相关的不良事件和导联性能。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;23(11):1228-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02375.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
9
Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.右心室导联位置并不影响心力衰竭伴心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗的获益。
Europace. 2011 Dec;13(12):1747-52. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur193. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.缺血性心肌病患者心脏再同步治疗的最佳左心室心内膜起搏部位。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless ultrasound-based LV endocardial pacing for CRT: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于无导线超声的左心室心内膜起搏用于心脏再同步治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04965-5.
2
Long-Term Complications Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.与心脏植入式电子设备相关的长期并发症
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2058. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062058.
3
Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging.
优化无导线心脏再同步治疗及无导线左心室间隔起搏的电疗效:来自心电图成像的左右心室激活见解
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 5;5(8):551-560. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.004. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Potential applications of ultrasound-based leadless endocardial pacing in adult congenital heart disease.基于超声的无导线心内膜起搏在成人先天性心脏病中的潜在应用。
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Feb;22(2):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
5
Beyond Medical Therapy-An Update on Heart Failure Devices.超越药物治疗——心力衰竭器械的最新进展
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jun 23;11(7):187. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070187.
6
Emerging Technologies in Cardiac Pacing.心脏起搏中的新兴技术。
Annu Rev Med. 2024 Jan 29;75:475-492. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051022-042616. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy.无导线心脏再同步治疗的成本效益分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;34(12):2590-2598. doi: 10.1111/jce.16102. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
8
Leadless Pacing: Therapy, Challenges and Novelties.无导线起搏:治疗、挑战与创新。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Apr 13;12:e09. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.41. eCollection 2023.
9
Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗无反应者的起搏干预措施。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1054095. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1054095. eCollection 2023.
10
Leadless biventricular left bundle and endocardial lateral wall pacing versus left bundle only pacing in left bundle branch block patients.无导线双心室左束支及心内膜侧壁起搏与单纯左束支起搏在左束支传导阻滞患者中的比较
Front Physiol. 2022 Dec 14;13:1049214. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1049214. eCollection 2022.