• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处理肾盏结石。

Managing caliceal stones.

作者信息

Gross Andreas J, Knipper Sophie, Netsch Christopher

机构信息

Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, 22291 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):92-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.124214.

DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.124214
PMID:24497690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3897062/
Abstract

The natural course of untreated asymptomatic caliceal calculi has not been clearly defined, especially in terms of disease progression, and the indications for and outcomes of surgical intervention are not precise. Caliceal stones may remain asymptomatic but, in case of migration, ureteral calculi can cause acute ureteric colic with severe complications. The decision for an active treatment of caliceal calculi is based on stone composition, stone size and symptoms. Extracorporal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has a low complication rate and is recommended by the current guidelines of the European Association of Urology as a first-line therapy for the treatment of caliceal stones <2 cm in diameter. However, immediate stone removal is not achieved with ESWL. The primary stone-free rates (SFR) after ESWL depend on stone site and composition and, especially for lower pole calculi, the SFR differ widely from other caliceal stones. Minimally-invasive procedures including percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy are alternatives for the treatment of caliceal stones, associated with low morbidity and high primary SFR when performed in centers of excellence.

摘要

未经治疗的无症状肾盏结石的自然病程尚未明确界定,尤其是在疾病进展方面,手术干预的指征和结果也不确切。肾盏结石可能一直无症状,但一旦发生移动,输尿管结石可导致急性输尿管绞痛并引发严重并发症。对肾盏结石进行积极治疗的决策基于结石成分、结石大小和症状。体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)并发症发生率低,欧洲泌尿外科学会现行指南推荐其作为直径<2 cm肾盏结石的一线治疗方法。然而,ESWL无法立即清除结石。ESWL后的首次无石率(SFR)取决于结石部位和成分,尤其是下极结石,其SFR与其他肾盏结石差异很大。包括经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管镜检查在内 的微创手术是治疗肾盏结石的替代方法,在专业中心进行时,发病率低且首次SFR高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/3897062/412e5d810f8a/IJU-30-92-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/3897062/412e5d810f8a/IJU-30-92-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/3897062/412e5d810f8a/IJU-30-92-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Managing caliceal stones.处理肾盏结石。
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):92-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.124214.
2
[Calyceal stones].
Urologe A. 2013 Aug;52(8):1135-45; quiz 1146-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-013-3239-9.
3
The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性下盏结石与孤立性中、上盏结石的疗效比较。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65509-7.
4
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
5
Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations.与其他肾部位置的结石相比,体外冲击波碎石术治疗儿童孤立性下盏结石的疗效。
Urology. 2006 Jan;67(1):170-4; discussion 174-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.061.
6
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.尿路结石的治疗选择:经皮肾镜碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术、体外冲击波碎石术和主动监测。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.逆行性肾内手术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗直径达15毫米的下极肾结石的比较。前瞻性随机研究。
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 May;39(4):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
8
[Predictive factors of successful treatment of lower caliceal calculi with Edap LT02 extracorporeal lithotripsy].[Edap LT02体外冲击波碎石术成功治疗下盏结石的预测因素]
Prog Urol. 2000 Sep;10(4):529-36.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub3.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
[New puncture techniques in urology using 3D-assisted imaging].[泌尿外科中使用三维辅助成像的新穿刺技术]
Urologe A. 2012 Dec;51(12):1703-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-012-3051-y.
2
Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study.半刚性输尿管镜并发症的 Clavien 分类:一项前瞻性研究。
Urology. 2012 Nov;80(5):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.047.
3
Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients.
术前输尿管支架置入对输尿管镜治疗肾输尿管结石结石清除率的影响:286 例配对分析。
Urology. 2012 Dec;80(6):1214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.064. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
4
Impact of case volumes on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术的病例量对疗效的影响。
Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):1181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
5
iPad-assisted percutaneous access to the kidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience.使用基于标记的导航技术通过iPad辅助经皮肾穿刺:初步临床经验
Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):628-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.024. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
6
Effectiveness of single flexible ureteroscopy for multiple renal calculi.单次输尿管软镜治疗多发性肾结石的疗效。
J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):431-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0233.
7
A prospective randomised trial comparing the modified HM3 with the MODULITH® SLX-F2 lithotripter.一项比较改良 HM3 与 MODULITH® SLX-F2 碎石机的前瞻性随机试验。
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.026. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
8
The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.《内镜泌尿外科协会经皮肾镜取石术全球研究临床研究办公室:5803 例患者的适应证、并发症和结局》。
J Endourol. 2011 Jan;25(1):11-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424.
9
Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy?在常规软性输尿管镜检查中是否需要安全线?
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1589-92. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0145.
10
A randomized comparison of totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients.老年患者完全无管化与标准经皮肾镜碎石取石术的随机对照比较。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.077. Epub 2010 Mar 17.