Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 93 Lipman Dr., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianhe Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510640, China.
J Econ Entomol. 2013 Dec;106(6):2522-9. doi: 10.1603/ec13155.
In recent years, the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius L. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), became a major public health concern in urban communities. Bed bugs are notoriously difficult to control, and their bites are not tolerated by most people. The public has an urgent need for materials and methods to reduce bed bug introduction and bites during work, travel, or sleep. A repellent product will help achieve these goals by discouraging and preventing bed bugs from moving to a protected area. We evaluated the repellency of three commercially available insect repellent or control materials and five nonregistered materials with the goal of identifying safe and effective bed bug repellents. The two commercial repellent products that contained 7% picaridin or 0.5% permethrin had little repellency against bed bugs. N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET), the most commonly used insect repellent, provided a high level of repellency against bed bugs. When a host cue (carbon dioxide) was present, the minimum DEET concentration to repel > or = 94% of the bed bugs for a9-h period was 10%. The longevity of repellency of DEET was concentration dependent. At 25% concentration, DEET-treated fabric surface remained highly repellent to bed bugs for a 14-d period. However, DEET has a strong smell and dissolves certain plastic materials. Therefore, we evaluated several odorless, noncorrosive, and potentially effective repellents. Isolongifolenone and isolongifolanone, two natural products and recently reported insect repellents, exhibited strong repellent property against bed bugs but at significantly lower levels than DEET. Three novel potential repellent compounds discovered by Bedoukian Research Inc. (Danbury, CT) exhibited similar level of repellency and longevity as DEET for repelling bed bugs. These nonirritant and odorless compounds are promising candidates as alternatives to DEET for reducing the spread of bed bugs and bed bug bites.
近年来,普通臭虫(Cimex lectularius L.)(半翅目:臭虫科)成为城市社区的主要公共卫生关注点。臭虫极难控制,其叮咬大多数人无法忍受。公众迫切需要减少工作、旅行或睡眠期间引入和叮咬臭虫的材料和方法。驱虫产品通过阻止和防止臭虫转移到保护区,有助于实现这些目标。我们评估了三种市售驱虫剂或控制材料以及五种非注册材料的驱避性,旨在确定安全有效的臭虫驱避剂。两种含有 7%派卡瑞丁或 0.5%氯菊酯的商业驱虫产品对臭虫的驱避性很小。N,N-二乙基间甲苯酰胺(DEET),最常用的驱虫剂,对臭虫有高度的驱避性。当存在宿主线索(二氧化碳)时,在 9 小时内驱除>或=94%的臭虫所需的最低 DEET 浓度为 10%。DEET 的驱避作用的持久性取决于浓度。在 25%的浓度下,DEET 处理的织物表面对臭虫仍保持高度的驱避性长达 14 天。然而,DEET 有强烈的气味并溶解某些塑料材料。因此,我们评估了几种无味、无腐蚀性且潜在有效的驱虫剂。异长叶烯酮和异长叶烯醇酮,两种天然产物和最近报道的驱虫剂,对臭虫表现出强烈的驱避特性,但水平明显低于 DEET。Bedoukian Research Inc.(Danbury,CT)发现的三种新型潜在驱虫化合物对臭虫具有与 DEET 相似的驱避性和持久性。这些无刺激性和无味的化合物是替代 DEET 减少臭虫传播和臭虫叮咬的有前途的候选者。