National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P,O, Box 1, Bilthoven BA 3720, The Netherlands.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Feb 5;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-8.
It often remains unclear to investigators how their research contributes to the work of the commissioner. We initiated the 'Risk Model' case study to gain insight into how a Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) project and its knowledge products contribute to the commissioner's work, the commissioner being the Health Care Inspectorate. We aimed to identify the alignment efforts that influenced the research project contributions. Based on the literature, we expected interaction between investigators and key users to be the most determining factor for the contributions of a research project.
In this qualitative case study, we analyzed the alignment efforts and contributions in the Risk Model project by means of document analysis and interviews according to the evaluation method Contribution Mapping. Furthermore, a map of the research process was drafted and a feedback session was organized. After the feedback session with stakeholders discussing the findings, we completed the case study report.
Both organizations had divergent views on the ownership of the research product and the relationship between RIVM and the Inspectorate, which resulted in different expectations. The RIVM considered the use of the risk models to be problematic, but the inspectors had a positive opinion about its contributions. Investigators, inspectors, and managers were not aware of these remarkably different perceptions. In this research project, we identified six relevant categories of both horizontal alignment efforts (between investigators and key users) as well as vertical alignment efforts (within own organization) that influenced the contributions to the Inspectorate's work.
Relevant alignment efforts influencing the contributions of the project became manifest at three levels: the first level directly relates to the project, the second to the organizational environment, and the third to the formal and historical relationship between the organizations. Both external and internal alignments influence the contributions of a research project. Based on the findings, we recommend that research institutes invest in a reflective attitude towards the social aspects of research projects at all levels of the organization and develop alignment strategies to enhance the contributions of research.
研究人员常常不清楚他们的研究工作对委托方有何贡献。我们启动了“风险模型”案例研究,以深入了解荷兰国家公共卫生与环境研究所(RIVM)的一个项目及其知识产品如何为委托方(即医疗保健监察局)的工作做出贡献。我们旨在确定影响研究项目贡献的协同工作。根据文献,我们预计研究人员与关键用户之间的互动将是决定研究项目贡献的最重要因素。
在这项定性案例研究中,我们根据评价方法“贡献映射”,通过文件分析和访谈分析了风险模型项目中的协同工作和贡献。此外,还绘制了研究过程图,并组织了一次反馈会议。在与利益相关者进行反馈会议讨论研究结果后,我们完成了案例研究报告。
两个组织对研究产品的所有权以及 RIVM 与监察局之间的关系存在不同看法,这导致了不同的期望。RIVM 认为使用风险模型存在问题,但监察局对其贡献持积极态度。研究人员、监察员和管理人员没有意识到这些明显不同的看法。在这个研究项目中,我们确定了六个相关类别,包括横向协同工作(研究人员与关键用户之间)以及纵向协同工作(组织内部),这些都影响了对监察局工作的贡献。
影响项目贡献的相关协同工作在三个层面上表现出来:第一个层面直接与项目相关,第二个层面与组织环境相关,第三个层面与组织之间的正式和历史关系相关。外部和内部协同工作都会影响研究项目的贡献。基于研究结果,我们建议研究机构在组织的各个层面上对研究项目的社会方面进行反思,并制定协同战略,以提高研究的贡献。