Hegger Ingrid, Kok Maarten O, Janssen Susan W J, Schuit Albertine J, van Oers Hans A M
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, Bilthoven, BA 3720, the Netherlands
Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, HV 1081, the Netherlands.
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):922-927. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw097. Epub 2016 Jul 24.
The Dutch Public Health Status and Forecasts report (PHSF Report) integrates research data and identifies future trends affecting public health in the Netherlands. To investigate how PHSF contributions to health policy can be enhanced, we analysed the development process whereby the PHSF Report for 2010 was produced (PHSF-2010).
To collect data, a case study approach was used along the lines of Contribution Mapping including analysis of documents from the PHSF-2010 process and interviews with actors involved. All interviews were recorded and transcribed ad verbatim and coded using an inductive code list.
The PHSF-2010 process included activities aimed at alignment between researchers and policy-makers, such as informal meetings. However, we identified three issues that are easily overlooked in knowledge development, but provide suggestions for enhancing contributions: awareness of divergent; continuously changing actor scenarios; vertical alignment within organizations involved and careful timing of draft products to create early adopters.
To enhance the contributions made by an established public health report, such as the PHSF Report, it is insufficient to raise the awareness of potential users. The knowledge product must be geared to policy-makers' needs and must be introduced into the scenarios of actors who may be less familiar. The demand for knowledge product adaptations has to be considered. This requires continuous alignment efforts in all directions: horizontal and vertical, external and internal. The findings of this study may be useful to researchers who aim to enhance the contributions of their knowledge products to health policy.
《荷兰公共卫生状况与预测报告》(PHSF报告)整合了研究数据,并确定了影响荷兰公共卫生的未来趋势。为了研究如何加强PHSF对卫生政策的贡献,我们分析了2010年PHSF报告(PHSF - 2010)的编制过程。
为收集数据,采用了基于贡献映射的案例研究方法,包括分析PHSF - 2010编制过程中的文件以及对相关参与者进行访谈。所有访谈均进行录音并逐字转录,使用归纳编码列表进行编码。
PHSF - 2010编制过程包括旨在促进研究人员与政策制定者之间协调一致的活动,如非正式会议。然而,我们确定了在知识发展中容易被忽视但能为加强贡献提供建议的三个问题:对分歧的认识;不断变化的参与者情况;相关组织内部的纵向协调以及精心安排草案产品的时间以培养早期采用者。
为了加强像PHSF报告这样既定的公共卫生报告所做的贡献,仅仅提高潜在用户的认识是不够的。知识产品必须适应政策制定者的需求,并且必须引入到可能不太熟悉的参与者的情况中。必须考虑对知识产品进行调整的需求。这需要在各个方向上持续进行协调努力:横向和纵向、外部和内部。本研究的结果可能对旨在加强其知识产品对卫生政策贡献的研究人员有用。