Hofmann Bjørn, Droste Sigrid, Oortwijn Wija, Cleemput Irina, Sacchini Dario
University College of Gjøvik and University of Oslo.
IQWiG, Germany.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jan;30(1):3-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000688.
Ethics has been part of health technology assessment (HTA) from its beginning in the 1970s, and is currently part of HTA definitions. Several methods in ethics have been used in HTA. Some approaches have been developed especially for HTA, such as the Socratic approach, which has been used for a wide range of health technologies. The Socratic approach is used in several ways, and there is a need for harmonization to promote its usability and the transferability of its results. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to stimulate experts in ethics and HTA to revise the Socratic approach.
Based on the current literature and experiences in applying methods in ethics, a panel of ethics experts involved in HTA critically analyzed the limitations of the Socratic approach during a face-to-face workshop. On the basis of this analysis a revision of the Socratic approach was agreed on after deliberation in several rounds through e-mail correspondence.
Several limitations with the Socratic approach are identified and addressed in the revised version which consists of a procedure of six steps, 7 main questions and thirty-three explanatory and guiding questions. The revised approach has a broader scope and provides more guidance than its predecessor. Methods for information retrieval have been elaborated.
The presented revision of the Socratic approach is the result of a joint effort of experts in the field of ethics and HTA. Consensus is reached in the expert panel on an approach that is considered to be more clear, comprehensive, and applicable for addressing ethical issues in HTA.
自20世纪70年代卫生技术评估(HTA)诞生以来,伦理学就一直是其一部分,并且目前是HTA定义的一部分。伦理学中的几种方法已被用于HTA。一些方法是专门为HTA开发的,例如苏格拉底方法,该方法已被广泛应用于各种卫生技术。苏格拉底方法有多种使用方式,需要进行统一以提高其可用性和结果的可转移性。因此,本研究的目的是促使伦理学和HTA领域的专家修订苏格拉底方法。
基于当前文献以及应用伦理学方法的经验,一个参与HTA的伦理学专家小组在一次面对面研讨会上批判性地分析了苏格拉底方法的局限性。在此分析的基础上,通过电子邮件通信经过几轮审议后,就苏格拉底方法的修订达成了一致。
修订版中指出并解决了苏格拉底方法的几个局限性,修订版包括一个由六个步骤、7个主要问题以及33个解释性和指导性问题组成的程序。修订后的方法范围更广,比其前身提供了更多指导。还阐述了信息检索方法。
所呈现的苏格拉底方法修订版是伦理学和HTA领域专家共同努力的结果。专家小组就一种被认为更清晰、全面且适用于解决HTA中伦理问题的方法达成了共识。