Suppr超能文献

居家儿童姑息治疗健康技术的伦理、法律和社会层面——一项系统综述

Ethical, legal, and social aspects of health technologies for home-based paediatric palliative care - a systematic review.

作者信息

Bjørnerud Erik, Steindal Simen A, Hofmann Bjørn M, Winger Anette, Riiser Kirsti, Chen Weiqin, Holmen Heidi

机构信息

Department of Natural Sciences, Practical-Aesthetic, Social and Religious Studies, Faculty of Teacher Education and Languages, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway.

Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 16;24(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01774-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home-based health technologies for paediatric palliative care have great potential to improve care for children, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and health systems. However, no systematic reviews have directly addressed the intersections among the ethical, legal, and social aspects of these technologies for paediatric palliative care. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and analyse the ethical, legal, and social aspects of health technologies for home-based paediatric palliative care.

METHODS

We have conducted a systematic review, inspired by the framework suggested by McCullough. We registered the review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024496034) and conducted a systematic search in six databases (ASSIA, Cinahl, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) on 27 November 2023 to identify relevant studies. Pairs of authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies and extracted data. The eligible studies employed a range of different methods from randomised controlled trials to usability studies. We then synthesised the data according to the ethical, legal and social aspects of the technologies.

RESULTS

Overall, our search resulted in 9,545 reports, which were screened after deduplication. The quality of the reports was assessed according to being published in peer reviewed journals. Fifteen reports were included, which showed that the main ethical issues are harm reduction, improved services, agency and autonomy, trust and empowerment. The main legal aspects are privacy equal access to care, participation in decisions and standardisation. The main social issues are cost reduction, transformation of family relations and novel modes of communication. Health technologies have the potential to alleviate burdens and improve the quality of care for children in paediatric palliative care and their families, but they also create novel burdens through constant reporting requirements and the vulnerability of some health technologies to technological malfunction. Nevertheless, they can increase family inclusion and children's autonomy and participation, thus empowering children, particularly through co-development of solutions. Furthermore, studies have indicated that health technologies themselves may have positive effects on children's health. The legal aspects of health technologies pertain to privacy and control over one's health information and equitable access to care and participation in care, while social issues can potentially reduce costs for health systems but also involve novel costs.

CONCLUSION

The reviewed studies concerning the co-development of health technologies reported increased benefits in terms of health, agency, well-being, and strengthened children's rights in home-based paediatric palliative care. However, the social dimensions of such technologies can lead to both public savings and reconfiguration of family constellations. We recommend that future researchers consider privacy, the formal dimensions of apps and smartphones, and their impacts on families.

PROSPERO REFERENCE

CRD42024496034.

摘要

背景

用于儿科姑息治疗的居家健康技术在改善儿童、照料者、医护人员及卫生系统的护理方面具有巨大潜力。然而,尚无系统评价直接探讨这些用于儿科姑息治疗的技术在伦理、法律和社会层面的交叉问题。本系统评价的目的是识别和分析用于居家儿科姑息治疗的健康技术在伦理、法律和社会方面的问题。

方法

我们受麦卡洛提出的框架启发进行了一项系统评价。我们在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42024496034)中登记了评价方案,并于2023年11月27日在六个数据库(ASSIA、护理学与健康领域数据库(Cinahl)、Embase、医学期刊数据库(Medline)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycInfo)和科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science))中进行了系统检索,以识别相关研究。由两位作者组成的小组独立评估研究的 eligibility 并提取数据。符合条件的研究采用了从随机对照试验到可用性研究等一系列不同方法。然后,我们根据技术的伦理、法律和社会方面对数据进行了综合分析。

结果

总体而言,我们的检索共得到9545篇报告,在去重后进行了筛选。根据是否发表在同行评审期刊上来评估报告的质量。纳入了15篇报告,这些报告表明主要的伦理问题是减少伤害、改善服务、能动性与自主性、信任与赋权。主要的法律方面是隐私、平等获得护理、参与决策和标准化。主要的社会问题是降低成本、家庭关系的转变和新型沟通方式。健康技术有减轻负担并改善儿科姑息治疗中儿童及其家庭护理质量的潜力,但它们也通过持续的报告要求以及一些健康技术易出现技术故障的特性产生了新的负担。尽管如此,它们可以增加家庭参与度以及儿童的自主性和参与度,从而赋予儿童权力,特别是通过共同开发解决方案来实现。此外,研究表明健康技术本身可能对儿童健康有积极影响。健康技术的法律方面涉及隐私和对个人健康信息的控制以及公平获得护理和参与护理,而社会问题可能会降低卫生系统的成本,但也涉及新的成本。

结论

关于健康技术共同开发的综述研究表明,在居家儿科姑息治疗中,在健康、能动性、福祉以及增强儿童权利方面有更多益处。然而,此类技术的社会层面既可能带来公共成本节约,也可能导致家庭结构的重新配置。我们建议未来的研究人员考虑隐私、应用程序和智能手机的形式层面及其对家庭的影响。

国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)参考文献:CRD42024496034。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/12082856/97f5ded2ea75/12904_2025_1774_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验