• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩时胎儿下降。

Fetal descent in labor.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):521-526. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000131.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000131
PMID:24499749
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Studies using contemporary populations and modern statistical methods have redefined our understanding of cervical dilation in labor. However, modern norms for fetal descent in labor have not been developed. We sought to estimate norms for fetal descent and estimate the expected fetal station for given cervical dilations.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive-term, vertex singletons who delivered vaginally. Detailed history, labor, and delivery information, including cervical examinations, were collected. A repeated-measures analysis was used to construct average descent curves. Interval-censored regression was used to estimate duration of labor between levels of station and to estimate the median station at a given dilation. Each analysis was stratified by parity and labor type (spontaneous compared with induced or augmented).

RESULTS

Of 4,618 consecutive-term spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 1,526 (33%) were nulliparous. Sixty-one percent were augmented or induced. Multiparous women had faster fetal descent at all stations except from +2 to +3 station. The median time to descend from one station point to another ranged from 0.1 to 1.6 hours, but the 95th percentiles encompassed over 12 hours at the same high-station among nulliparous women who achieved vaginal delivery. Fetal descent was more rapid in women who labored spontaneously without augmentation. Multiparous women tended to have a higher station than nulliparous women until late in the first stage.

CONCLUSION

Multiparous women and women who are not augmented or induced have faster fetal descent. There is wide variation in the expected station by increments of dilation. However, 95% of women have a fetal station of 0 or lower at complete cervical dilation.

摘要

目的

使用当代人群和现代统计方法的研究重新定义了我们对分娩时宫颈扩张的理解。然而,尚未制定分娩时胎儿下降的现代标准。我们试图估计胎儿下降的正常值,并估计给定宫颈扩张的预期胎儿位置。

方法

这是一项连续足月、头位单胎阴道分娩的回顾性队列研究。收集详细的病史、分娩和分娩信息,包括宫颈检查。采用重复测量分析构建平均下降曲线。间隔censored 回归用于估计不同胎方位之间的产程时间,并估计在给定扩张程度时的中位数胎方位。每次分析均按产次和分娩类型(自然分娩与引产或催产)分层。

结果

在 4618 例连续足月自然分娩中,1526 例(33%)为初产妇。61%为引产或催产。除了从+2 到+3 位,多产妇在所有部位的胎儿下降速度都更快。从一个部位点下降到另一个部位点的中位数时间范围为 0.1 至 1.6 小时,但在初产妇中,在同一高位分娩时,95%的时间超过 12 小时。未接受催产或引产的自然分娩妇女的胎儿下降速度更快。多产妇的胎方位通常高于初产妇,直到第一产程后期。

结论

多产妇和未接受催产或引产的产妇胎儿下降速度更快。宫颈扩张每增加一度,预期胎方位的差异很大。然而,95%的产妇在宫颈完全扩张时胎儿的胎方位为 0 或更低。

相似文献

1
Fetal descent in labor.分娩时胎儿下降。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):521-526. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000131.
2
Descent of the fetal head (station) during the first stage of labor.胎头下降(位置)在第一产程中。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):360.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
Fetal descent in nulliparous women assessed by ultrasound: a longitudinal study.超声评估初产妇胎儿下降情况:一项纵向研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):378.e1-378.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
Normal Labor: Physiology, Evaluation, and Management正常分娩:生理学、评估与管理
5
Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor.影响引产孕妇超声判断产程进展的因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):592.e1-592.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.236. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
First stage of labor progression in women with large-for-gestational age infants.巨大儿产妇第一产程进展。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):640.e1-640.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.042. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.超声判断的产程进展在需要剖宫产的产妇和引产经阴道分娩的产妇中有所不同。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):335.e1-335.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
New labor curves of dilation and station to improve the accuracy of predicting labor progress.新的宫颈扩张和先露下降曲线提高了预测分娩进展的准确性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.289. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Labor Curve Analysis of Medically Indicated Early Preterm Induction of Labor.医学指征的早期早产引产的产程曲线分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;134(4):759-764. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003467.
10
Assessing first-stage labor progression and its relationship to complications.评估第一产程进展及其与并发症的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):358.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Labor Patterns: A Prospective Cohort Study in Greece.分娩模式的超声评估:希腊的一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 25;14(15):5283. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155283.
2
The evolution of the labor curve and its implications for clinical practice: the relationship between cervical dilation, station, and time during labor.劳动力曲线的演变及其对临床实践的意义:劳动力期间宫颈扩张、位置和时间之间的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1050-S1062. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
The utilization of transperineal ultrasound following fetal heart deceleration after epidural analgesia: a case report.
经硬膜外镇痛后胎儿心率减速行经会阴超声检查的应用:病例报告。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05197-7.
4
Transporting an Artificial Intelligence Model to Predict Emergency Cesarean Delivery: Overcoming Challenges Posed by Interfacility Variation.将人工智能模型用于预测紧急剖宫产:克服院际差异带来的挑战。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 10;23(12):e28120. doi: 10.2196/28120.
5
Station of the fetal head at complete cervical dilation impacts duration of second stage of labor.宫颈完全扩张时胎头位置影响第二产程时长。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 31;7:100100. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100100. eCollection 2020 Jul.