• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病患者健康组织:为何有些人会利用它们,而有些人却不会?

Consumer health organisations for chronic conditions: why do some people access them and others don’t?

作者信息

Sav Adem, McMillan Sara S, Kelly Fiona, Whitty Jennifer A, Kendall Elizabeth, King Michelle A, Wheeler Amanda J

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014 Oct;15(4):418-29. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000036.

DOI:10.1017/S1463423614000036
PMID:24499809
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consumer health organisations (CHOs), which operate outside the mainstream healthcare system with a specific focus on supporting people to self-manage their health conditions, have become widespread. Yet, there has been little systematic research into CHOs, including their perceived benefits and barriers, which encourage or deter their access by people with a variety of chronic health conditions.

AIM

This study explored the benefits of CHOs in self-management and also the barriers that inhibit their access, from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and their unpaid carers.

METHODS

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were completed with 97 participants across four regions of Australia. The sample included a high representation of people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as well as non-indigenous Australians.

FINDINGS

Three inter-related themes were identified that represented the benefits of involvement and participation in CHOs: knowledge and information, connection and support and experiential learning. However, limited access pathways emerged as a barrier that inhibited a person’s entry into CHOs. Furthermore, the person’s beliefs and experiences about their own health condition(s) also inhibited their continued participation in CHO programmes.

CONCLUSION

Although our findings confirm that CHOs are a valuable resource in alleviating the ‘work of being a patient’ for some people, there seems to be some barriers that prevent their full access and utilisation.Structured integration systems to increase the reliable delivery and accessibility of CHOs are needed to ensure that people who would benefit from accessing them can do so.

摘要

背景

消费者健康组织(CHOs)在主流医疗体系之外运作,特别专注于支持人们自我管理健康状况,现已广泛存在。然而,对于消费者健康组织,包括其感知到的益处和障碍,很少有系统的研究,这些因素会鼓励或阻碍患有各种慢性健康状况的人加入。

目的

本研究从慢性病患者及其无偿护理者的角度,探讨了消费者健康组织在自我管理方面的益处以及阻碍人们加入的障碍。

方法

对澳大利亚四个地区的97名参与者进行了深入的半结构化访谈。样本中包括了来自文化和语言背景多样的人群、原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民以及非原住民澳大利亚人的高比例代表。

结果

确定了三个相互关联的主题,代表了参与消费者健康组织的益处:知识与信息、联系与支持以及体验式学习。然而,有限的加入途径成为阻碍人们加入消费者健康组织的障碍。此外,个人对自身健康状况的信念和经历也阻碍了他们继续参与消费者健康组织的项目。

结论

尽管我们的研究结果证实,消费者健康组织是减轻一些人“患者负担”的宝贵资源,但似乎存在一些障碍阻碍了其全面的加入和利用。需要建立结构化的整合系统,以提高消费者健康组织服务的可靠提供和可及性,确保能够从加入中受益的人能够这样做。

相似文献

1
Consumer health organisations for chronic conditions: why do some people access them and others don’t?慢性病患者健康组织:为何有些人会利用它们,而有些人却不会?
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014 Oct;15(4):418-29. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000036.
2
"This is my boy's health! Talk straight to me!" perspectives on accessible and culturally safe care among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients of clinical genetics services.这是我孩子的健康!跟我直说!”临床遗传学服务中,澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民患者对可及性和文化安全性护理的看法。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Apr 17;20(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01443-0.
3
Strategic approaches to enhanced health service delivery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with chronic illness: a qualitative study.战略性方法以提高慢性病的澳式原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的健康服务提供:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 8;12:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-143.
4
Exploring experiences and perceptions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples readmitted to hospital with chronic disease in New South Wales, Australia: a qualitative study.探索澳大利亚新南威尔士州因慢性病再次住院的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的经历和看法:一项定性研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):411-417. doi: 10.1071/AH20342.
5
Exploration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives of Home Medicines Review.探索原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民对家庭药物审查的看法。
Rural Remote Health. 2015;15:3009. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
6
An exploratory qualitative study of inter-agency health and social service partnerships focused on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients.一项针对以原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民为服务对象的跨机构健康与社会服务伙伴关系的探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11656-y.
7
'She knows how we feel': Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander childbearing women's experience of Continuity of Care with an Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander midwifery student.“她知道我们的感受”:澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民孕产妇与澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民助产学学生连续护理的体验。
Women Birth. 2014 Sep;27(3):157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
8
Cardiac Rehabilitation for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Western Australia.西澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的心脏康复
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jul 13;16:150. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0330-3.
9
Are we there yet? Exploring the journey to quality stroke care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in rural and remote Queensland.我们到了吗?探索为昆士兰农村和偏远地区的原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民提供优质中风护理的历程。
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Sep;19(3):4850. doi: 10.22605/RRH4850. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Why do people with chronic disease not contact consumer health organisations? A survey of general practice patients.慢性病患者为何不联系消费者健康组织?一项针对全科医疗患者的调查。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Jul;17(4):393-404. doi: 10.1017/S146342361500050X. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a structured health promotional program using the self-support groups on lifestyle behavior: The .使用自助小组的结构化健康促进计划对生活方式行为的影响:《……》 (原文最后“the.”不完整,可能有信息缺失)
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 29;13:256. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1204_23. eCollection 2024.
2
EXPERTS II - How are patient and caregiver participation in health and social care shaped by experienced burden of treatment and social inequalities? Protocol for a qualitative synthesis.专家二——患者和照护者在健康与社会照护中的参与是如何受到治疗负担和社会不平等经历的影响的?一项定性综合研究方案
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Jun 16;3:31. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13411.1. eCollection 2023.
3
The HANS KAI Project: a community-based approach to improving health and well-being through peer support.
汉斯·凯项目:一种通过同伴支持来改善健康和福祉的社区方法。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Mar;38(3):135-146. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.3.04.