Fagerli Karen M, van der Heijde Désirée, Heiberg Marte S, Wierød Ada, Kalstad Synøve, Rødevand Erik, Mikkelsen Knut, Kvien Tore K, Lie Elisabeth
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Jun;53(6):1087-94. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket450.
The objectives of this study were to characterize patients with predominantly axial SpA who received SSZ as their first DMARD, compare the response to treatment in patients with and without peripheral disease and identify predictors of discontinuation of SSZ. We also investigated response to TNF inhibitor (TNFi) after SSZ failure.
We included DMARD-naive patients with predominantly axial SpA starting SSZ or TNFi treatment from a Norwegian, multicentre longitudinal observational study (NOR-DMARD). In patients starting SSZ, we compared the 3-month responses between patients with and without swollen joints and identified predictors of discontinuation by Cox regression analysis. Sixty-six SSZ-treated patients later switched to a TNFi, and we compared their 3-month responses and drug survival to patients starting a TNFi as their first DMARD.
Patients receiving SSZ (n = 181) as their first DMARD had shorter disease duration, were more frequently female and had more swollen joints than those starting TNFi (n = 543). There was a trend toward better 3-month responses to SSZ in patients with peripheral joint swelling, and they had significantly better 3-year drug survival than patients without swollen joints at baseline. Predictors of SSZ discontinuation were no peripheral joint swelling, higher CRP and higher BASDAI back pain score. TNFi response was similar in patients previously treated with SSZ, as in DMARD-naive patients.
Our findings support current recommendations of SSZ as an optional treatment in SpA patients with peripheral disease, although overall responses were modest. Initial treatment with SSZ does not seem to impair later TNFi response.
本研究的目的是对接受柳氮磺胺吡啶(SSZ)作为首个改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)的以中轴型脊柱关节炎(SpA)为主的患者进行特征描述,比较有或无外周疾病的患者对治疗的反应,并确定停用SSZ的预测因素。我们还研究了SSZ治疗失败后对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)的反应。
我们纳入了来自挪威多中心纵向观察研究(NOR-DMARD)中开始使用SSZ或TNFi治疗的初治DMARD的以中轴型SpA为主的患者。在开始使用SSZ的患者中,我们比较了有关节肿胀和无关节肿胀患者的3个月反应,并通过Cox回归分析确定停药的预测因素。66例接受SSZ治疗的患者后来改用TNFi,我们将他们的3个月反应和药物生存期与开始使用TNFi作为首个DMARD的患者进行了比较。
接受SSZ(n = 181)作为首个DMARD的患者比开始使用TNFi(n = 543)的患者病程更短,女性更常见,关节肿胀更多。外周关节肿胀的患者对SSZ的3个月反应有更好的趋势,并且他们在基线时的3年药物生存期明显优于无关节肿胀的患者。停用SSZ的预测因素是无外周关节肿胀、较高的C反应蛋白(CRP)和较高的巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)背痛评分。既往接受SSZ治疗的患者对TNFi的反应与初治DMARD的患者相似。
我们的研究结果支持目前将SSZ作为有外周疾病的SpA患者的一种可选治疗方法的建议,尽管总体反应一般。初始使用SSZ治疗似乎不会损害后期对TNFi的反应。