Fagerli Karen M, Lie Elisabeth, van der Heijde Désirée, Heiberg Marte S, Kaufmann Cecilie, Rødevand Erik, Mikkelsen Knut, Kalstad Synøve, Kvien Tore K
Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 23 Vinderen, N-0319 Oslo, Norway.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Aug;51(8):1479-83. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes057. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
To compare Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥2.1 with BASDAI >4 as an eligibility criterion for initiation of TNF inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in AS, and to investigate if ASDAS performs satisfactorily in patients without elevated CRP or without peripheral joint swelling.
Two hundred and eighty-nine patients starting their first TNFi were identified from a longitudinal observational study (NOR-DMARD) and grouped according to the fulfilment of ASDAS and BASDAI TNFi eligibility criteria. The 3-month responses were compared across several response measures. Patients were also grouped according to CRP level and the presence or absence of swollen joints, and responses were compared.
The majority of patients (n = 212) fulfilled both eligibility criteria, and this group had the best response. Very few patients (n = 4) fulfilled only the BASDAI criterion. Patients fulfilling only the ASDAS criterion (n = 48) had a reasonable response. Patients with an elevated vs not elevated CRP at baseline had better responses according to all response measures, but patients without elevated CRP also responded. We also observed trends towards better responses in patients with vs without peripheral joint swelling.
More patients were eligible for TNFi using the ASDAS than the BASDAI eligibility criterion (n = 260 vs n = 216). Fulfilment of both criteria gave the greatest likelihood of improvement, but the patients who only fulfilled the ASDAS criterion also improved. ASDAS was found to be applicable also in subgroups without elevated CRP and without peripheral joint swelling.
比较强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)≥2.1与巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)>4作为强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者启动肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗的入选标准,并调查在无CRP升高或无外周关节肿胀的患者中ASDAS的表现是否令人满意。
从一项纵向观察性研究(NOR-DMARD)中确定289例开始首次使用TNFi治疗的患者,并根据是否满足ASDAS和BASDAI的TNFi入选标准进行分组。比较了几种反应指标在3个月时的反应情况。患者还根据CRP水平以及是否存在关节肿胀进行分组,并比较了反应情况。
大多数患者(n = 212)符合两项入选标准,该组反应最佳。极少数患者(n = 4)仅符合BASDAI标准。仅符合ASDAS标准的患者(n = 48)有合理的反应。根据所有反应指标,基线时CRP升高的患者比未升高的患者反应更好,但CRP未升高的患者也有反应。我们还观察到有外周关节肿胀的患者比没有肿胀的患者有更好反应的趋势。
使用ASDAS作为入选标准的TNFi治疗 eligible患者比使用BASDAI入选标准的患者更多(n = 260对n = 216)。满足两项标准的患者改善的可能性最大,但仅符合ASDAS标准的患者也有改善。发现ASDAS在CRP未升高且无外周关节肿胀的亚组中也适用。