Suppr超能文献

左颈内动脉狭窄合并牛主动脉弓患者的颈动脉支架置入术:60例经右桡动脉或肱动脉入路连续治疗患者的单中心经验

Carotid artery stenting in patients with left ICA stenosis and bovine aortic arch: a single-center experience in 60 consecutive patients treated via the right radial or brachial approach.

作者信息

Montorsi Piero, Galli Stefano, Ravagnani Paolo M, Trabattoni Daniela, Fabbiocchi Franco, Lualdi Alessandro, Ballerini Giovanni, Andreini Daniele, Pontone Gianluca, Caputi Luigi, Bartorelli Antonio L

机构信息

1 Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Feb;21(1):127-36. doi: 10.1583/13-4491MR.1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) of the left internal carotid artery (LICA) from a right radial/brachial approach in patients with bovine aortic arch.

METHODS

Among 505 consecutive CAS patients treated at our facility between June 2007 and December 2012, 60 (11.9%) patients (44 men; mean age 73±9 years) with LICA stenosis and bovine arch were treated from a right radial (n=32) or brachial (n=28) approach. Three quarters of the patients had characteristics qualifying them at high surgical risk; 52 were asymptomatic. The types of cerebral protection (a distal filter or proximal MO.MA system), stent, and technique were at the operation's discretion.

RESULTS

The radial/brachial approach was successful in 59 (98.3%) of 60 procedures; 1 case was converted to a femoral approach. Proximal protection was used in 15 cases (11 brachial, 4 radial) with severe, soft plaques, although the MO.MA system proved too short in a tall patient having a radial approach and a filter was used. Clinical success with no adverse events was 96.7% owing to 1 retinal embolism and 1 minor stroke. Vascular complications occurred in 2 (3.3%) brachial group patients. No major bleeding was encountered. Over a mean follow-up of 18.7±17.5 months, midterm event-free survival was 93%. No target vessel revascularization was necessary.

CONCLUSION

CAS via a right radial or brachial approach is safe and effective in patients with LICA stenosis and types 1 or 2 bovine arch.

摘要

目的

评估经右桡动脉/肱动脉途径对牛主动脉弓患者行左颈内动脉(LICA)支架置入术(CAS)的安全性和有效性。

方法

在2007年6月至2012年12月期间于我院接受连续CAS治疗的505例患者中,60例(11.9%)(44例男性;平均年龄73±9岁)患有LICA狭窄和牛主动脉弓,采用右桡动脉(n = 32)或肱动脉(n = 28)途径进行治疗。四分之三的患者具有使其处于高手术风险的特征;52例无症状。脑保护类型(远端滤器或近端MO.MA系统)、支架和技术由手术医生决定。

结果

60例手术中有59例(98.3%)经桡动脉/肱动脉途径成功;1例转为股动脉途径。15例(11例肱动脉途径、4例桡动脉途径)有严重软斑块的患者采用了近端保护,尽管在1例采用桡动脉途径的高个子患者中MO.MA系统被证明太短,因而使用了滤器。因1例视网膜栓塞和1例轻度卒中,无不良事件的临床成功率为96.7%。肱动脉组有2例(3.3%)患者发生血管并发症。未发生大出血。平均随访18.7±17.5个月,中期无事件生存率为93%。无需进行靶血管血运重建。

结论

经右桡动脉或肱动脉途径行CAS对患有LICA狭窄和1型或2型牛主动脉弓的患者是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验