• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.主动脉弓类型对接受颈动脉支架置入术患者技术指标的影响。
J Int Med Res. 2019 Feb;47(2):682-688. doi: 10.1177/0300060518807604. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
Carotid artery stenting in difficult aortic arch anatomy with or without a new dedicated guiding catheter: preliminary experience.颈动脉支架置入术治疗困难主动脉弓解剖结构的初步经验:有或无新型专用引导导管。
Eur Radiol. 2013 May;23(5):1420-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2708-7. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
3
Predictors of difficult carotid stenting as determined by aortic arch angiography.经主动脉弓血管造影确定的困难颈动脉支架置入术的预测因素。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 May;20(5):200-4.
4
The concept of an anatomy related individual arterial access: lowering technical and clinical complications with transradial access in bovine- and type-III aortic arch carotid artery stenting.与解剖结构相关的个体化动脉入路概念:在牛型和III型主动脉弓颈动脉支架置入术中经桡动脉入路降低技术和临床并发症
Vasa. 2011 Nov;40(6):468-73. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000150.
5
Aortic arch types and postoperative outcomes after carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.无症状和有症状患者颈动脉支架置入术后主动脉弓类型与术后结局。
Int Angiol. 2020 Dec;39(6):485-491. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04494-6. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Predictors of the multiwire technique use in carotid artery stenting.多导丝技术在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用预测因素。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Feb;147:110120. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110120. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
7
Clinical and procedural impact of aortic arch anatomic variants in carotid stenting procedures.主动脉弓解剖变异在颈动脉支架置入术中的临床及操作影响
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;86(3):480-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25947. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
The value of 3D-CT angiographic assessment prior to carotid stenting.颈动脉支架置入术前3D-CT血管造影评估的价值。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;49(3):614-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.015.
9
Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.三维对比增强磁共振血管造影在颈动脉支架置入术规划中的准确性和实用性。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.051. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
10
A tailored approach to overcoming challenges of a bovine aortic arch during left internal carotid artery stenting.一种针对牛主动脉弓在左颈内动脉支架置入术中所面临挑战的个体化处理方法。
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Jun;19(3):329-38. doi: 10.1583/11-3730MR.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-Related Anatomical Changes in Carotid Artery Stenosis and Its Impact on Postoperative Complications in Stenting and Endarterectomy.颈动脉狭窄的年龄相关解剖学变化及其对支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术术后并发症的影响。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Jul;31(7):e70527. doi: 10.1111/cns.70527.
2
Transradial Lower Limb Arteriography of the Type Ⅲ Aortic Arch: A Reverse Technique.Ⅲ型主动脉弓的经桡动脉下肢动脉造影:一种逆向技术。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 9;17(2):e78771. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78771. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Transradial Approach for Neurovascular Interventions : A Literature Review.经桡动脉途径在神经血管介入治疗中的应用:文献综述
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2025 Mar;68(2):113-126. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2024.0152. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
Effects of percutaneous endovascular angioplasty for severe stenosis or occlusion of subclavian artery.经皮腔内血管成形术治疗锁骨下动脉严重狭窄或闭塞的效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 21;14(1):14290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65302-y.
5
3D Characterization of the Aortic Valve and Aortic Arch in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients.二叶式主动脉瓣患者主动脉瓣和主动脉弓的三维特征。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Aug;52(8):2258-2268. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03527-8. Epub 2024 May 11.
6
Transradial artery access for carotid artery stenting: A pooled analysis.经桡动脉入路行颈动脉支架置入术:汇总分析。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Oct;37(5):546-555. doi: 10.1177/19714009231224410. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radial or Femoral Access for Carotid Stenting.系统评价和荟萃分析桡动脉或股动脉入路在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Mar;34(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01315-w. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
8
Patient-Specific 3D-Print Extracranial Vascular Simulators and Infrared Imaging Platform for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography Training.用于诊断性脑血管造影训练的患者特异性3D打印颅外血管模拟器和红外成像平台。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;10(11):2277. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112277.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.第二代与第一代颈动脉支架的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819.
10
Efficacy of the MRA-Based Road Mapping of the Para-Aortic Access Route before Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者机械取栓术前基于磁共振血管造影的腹主动脉旁入路路径图绘制的有效性
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2022;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1159/000524112. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Vascular Anatomy Predicts the Risk of Cerebral Ischemia in Patients Randomized to Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy.血管解剖结构可预测随机接受颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术患者的脑缺血风险。
Stroke. 2017 May;48(5):1285-1292. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014612. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
2
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal.血流逆转的经颈动脉血管重建术。
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1526602817693607. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄支架治疗与手术治疗随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Simultaneous Bilateral vs Unilateral Carotid Artery Stenting: 30-Day and 1-Year Results.同期双侧与单侧颈动脉支架置入术:30天及1年结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Apr;23(2):258-66. doi: 10.1177/1526602815626900. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
A randomised comparison of transradial and transfemoral approach for carotid artery stenting: RADCAR (RADial access for CARotid artery stenting) study.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行颈动脉支架置入术的随机对照研究:RADCAR(颈动脉支架置入术的桡动脉入路)研究
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jul;10(3):381-91. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I3A64.
6
Carotid artery stenting in patients with left ICA stenosis and bovine aortic arch: a single-center experience in 60 consecutive patients treated via the right radial or brachial approach.左颈内动脉狭窄合并牛主动脉弓患者的颈动脉支架置入术:60例经右桡动脉或肱动脉入路连续治疗患者的单中心经验
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Feb;21(1):127-36. doi: 10.1583/13-4491MR.1.
7
Carotid artery stenting in difficult aortic arch anatomy with or without a new dedicated guiding catheter: preliminary experience.颈动脉支架置入术治疗困难主动脉弓解剖结构的初步经验:有或无新型专用引导导管。
Eur Radiol. 2013 May;23(5):1420-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2708-7. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
8
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
9
Transradial and transbrachial arterial approach for simultaneous carotid angiographic examination and stenting using catheter looping and retrograde engagement technique.经桡动脉和经肱动脉途径,采用导管成袢和逆行介入技术同步进行颈动脉血管造影检查和支架置入术。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jul;24(5):670-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
10
Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术与支架置入术的短期和中期比较:随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Feb 12;340:c467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c467.

主动脉弓类型对接受颈动脉支架置入术患者技术指标的影响。

Effect of aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.

作者信息

Shen Songhe, Jiang Xiongjing, Dong Hui, Peng Meng, Wang Zhixue, Che Wuqiang, Zou Yubao, Yang Yuejin

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.

2 Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2019 Feb;47(2):682-688. doi: 10.1177/0300060518807604. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1177/0300060518807604
PMID:30378455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6381475/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to explore the effect of the aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

The data of 224 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral CAS from January 2011 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The requirement for placement of the guiding catheter into the common carotid artery with assistance of an angiographic catheter, fluoroscopy time, contrast agent dose, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The fluoroscopy time was significantly longer and the contrast agent dose was significantly higher in patients with Type III than Type I and II arches. Significantly more patients with Type III than Type I and II arches required placement of the guiding catheter with assistance of an angiographic catheter (46.2% vs. 15.0%, respectively). The procedural success rate was significantly lower in patients with Type III than Type I and II arches (96.2% vs. 100.0%, respectively). The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and all types of stroke was significantly higher in patients with Type III than Type I and II arches (7.7% vs. 1.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The aortic arch type is an important influential factor in CAS. Type III arches are associated with more difficulties and complications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨主动脉弓类型对接受颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)患者技术指标的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年12月期间连续接受单侧CAS的224例患者的数据。记录在血管造影导管辅助下将引导导管置入颈总动脉的需求、透视时间、造影剂剂量和不良事件。

结果

III型主动脉弓患者的透视时间明显长于I型和II型主动脉弓患者,造影剂剂量也明显更高。与I型和II型主动脉弓患者相比,III型主动脉弓患者需要在血管造影导管辅助下放置引导导管的人数明显更多(分别为46.2%和15.0%)。III型主动脉弓患者的手术成功率明显低于I型和II型主动脉弓患者(分别为96.2%和100.0%)。III型主动脉弓患者的死亡、心肌梗死和所有类型中风的发生率明显高于I型和II型主动脉弓患者(分别为7.7%和1.7%)。

结论

主动脉弓类型是CAS的一个重要影响因素。III型主动脉弓与更多的困难和并发症相关。