Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Bacterial Diseases Branch, 3156 Rampart Road, Fort Collins, CO 80521 USA.
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 6;14:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-67.
The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S4 is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the past six decades. Studies have demonstrated virulence differences among the two clinically relevant subspecies of F. tularensis, tularensis (type A) and holarctica (type B) and more recently between type A subpopulations (A1a, A1b and A2). Schu S4 belongs to the most virulent subspecies of F. tularensis, subspecies tularensis.
In this study, we investigated the relative virulence of Schu S4 in comparison to A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains using a temperature-based murine model of infection. Mice were inoculated intradermally and a hypothermic drop point was used as a surrogate for death. Survival curves and the length of temperature phases were compared for all infections. Bacterial burdens were also compared between the most virulent type A subpopulation, A1b, and Schu S4 at drop point.
Survival curve comparisons demonstrate that the Schu S4 strain used in this study resembles the virulence of type B strains, and is significantly less virulent than all other type A (A1a, A1b and A2) strains tested. Additionally, when bacterial burdens were compared between mice infected with Schu S4 or MA00-2987 (A1b) significantly higher burdens were present in the blood and spleen of mice infected with MA00-2987.
The knowledge gained from using Schu S4 as a prototypic virulent strain has unquestionably advanced the field of tularemia research. The findings of this study, however, indicate that careful consideration of F. tularensis strain selection must occur when the overall virulence of the strain used could impact the outcome and interpretation of results.
在研究传染性病原体的实验室中,使用原型菌株很常见,因为它可以促进实验室之间数据可比性的一致性。苏斯 4 株是土拉弗朗西斯菌的原型毒力株,在过去的六十年中被广泛用作这种菌株。研究表明,在两种临床相关的土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种,即土拉弗朗西斯菌(A型)和霍拉蒂卡(B 型)以及最近在 A 型亚群(A1a、A1b 和 A2)之间存在毒力差异。苏斯 4 株属于土拉弗朗西斯菌最毒力的亚种,即土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种。
在这项研究中,我们使用基于温度的感染小鼠模型,研究了苏斯 4 株与 A1a、A1b、A2 和 B 型菌株的相对毒力。小鼠通过皮内接种感染,体温下降点被用作死亡的替代指标。比较了所有感染的生存曲线和温度阶段的长度。还比较了在体温下降点最毒力的 A 型亚群 A1b 和苏斯 4 株之间的细菌负荷。
生存曲线比较表明,本研究中使用的苏斯 4 株株类似于 B 型菌株的毒力,并且明显比所有其他测试的 A 型(A1a、A1b 和 A2)菌株的毒力低。此外,当比较感染苏斯 4 株或 MA00-2987(A1b)的小鼠之间的细菌负荷时,感染 MA00-2987 的小鼠的血液和脾脏中存在显著更高的细菌负荷。
使用苏斯 4 株作为原型毒力株获得的知识无疑推进了土拉弗朗西斯菌研究领域的发展。然而,本研究的结果表明,当使用的菌株的整体毒力可能影响结果和对结果的解释时,必须仔细考虑土拉弗朗西斯菌菌株的选择。