• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice.实验室检查医嘱开立与结果管理系统:一项关于全科医疗管理人员所识别的安全风险的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 6;4(2):e004245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004245.
2
Quality and safety issues highlighted by patients in the handling of laboratory test results by general practices--a qualitative study.患者对全科医疗中实验室检查结果处理所强调的质量与安全问题——一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 6;14:206. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-206.
3
Test result communication in primary care: clinical and office staff perspectives.基层医疗中的检测结果沟通:临床人员与办公室工作人员的观点
Fam Pract. 2014 Oct;31(5):592-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu041. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
4
System hazards in managing laboratory test requests and results in primary care: medical protection database analysis and conceptual model.基层医疗中管理实验室检查申请和结果的系统风险:医疗保障数据库分析与概念模型
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 27;5(11):e008968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008968.
5
Qualitative evaluation of the Safety and Improvement in Primary Care (SIPC) pilot collaborative in Scotland: perceptions and experiences of participating care teams.苏格兰基层医疗安全与改善(SIPC)试点合作项目的定性评估:参与护理团队的看法与经验
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009526.
6
Facilitators and barriers to safer care in Scottish general practice: a qualitative study of the implementation of the trigger review method using normalisation process theory.促进和阻碍苏格兰全科医疗中更安全护理的因素:使用常规过程理论对触发式审查方法实施的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e029914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029914.
7
Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医疗中基层医疗人员对区域数据质量干预措施的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 26;17:50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0445-8.
8
Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study.初级保健中患者对检查结果沟通的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):e133-40. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683929.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Evaluating ambulatory practice safety: the PROMISES project administrators and practice staff surveys.评估门诊实践安全性:PROMISES项目管理人员及实践人员调查
Med Care. 2015 Feb;53(2):141-52. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000269.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.全科医疗接待员临床导向角色的影响:一项叙事性综合的系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Feb 27;75(752):e159-e165. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0228. Print 2025 Mar.
2
Communicating blood test results in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review.基层医疗中血液检测结果的传达:一项混合方法的系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Mar 27;75(753):e222-e231. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0338. Print 2025 Apr.
3
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.电子健康使用对大流行前普通实践工作量的影响:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.
4
Patient aggression towards receptionists in general practice: a systematic review.患者对全科医生接待员的攻击:系统评价。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002171.
5
User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment.用户对一般实践工作环境的监测风险和改进系统安全 (MoRISS) 清单进行重新设计、测试和评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Nov;9(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977.
6
Direct notification of cervical cytology results to women improves follow-up in cervical cancer screening - A cluster-randomised trial.向女性直接通报宫颈细胞学检查结果可改善宫颈癌筛查的后续跟进——一项整群随机试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Nov 23;13:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.015. eCollection 2019 Mar.
7
Content analysis of 50 clinical negligence claims involving test results management systems in general practice.对50起涉及全科医疗中检测结果管理系统的临床过失索赔案的内容分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Nov 22;7(4):e000463. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000463. eCollection 2018.
8
The impact of status and social context on health service co-design: an example from a collaborative improvement initiative in UK primary care.地位和社会背景对医疗服务共同设计的影响:来自英国初级保健合作改善计划的一个例子。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0608-5.
9
Patient-centred improvement to repeat prescribing using the Always Event concept.运用“始终事件”概念以患者为中心改进重复开药流程。
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Nov 20;6(2):e000042. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000042. eCollection 2017.
10
The role of informal dimensions of safety in high-volume organisational routines: an ethnographic study of test results handling in UK general practice.安全的非正式维度在高容量组织常规中的作用:对英国全科医疗中检测结果处理的人种志研究
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 27;12(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0586-8.

本文引用的文献

1
How improving communication between GPs and receptionists can benefit your practice.
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Sep;23(5):350-2. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494137.
2
Receptionists' experiences of occupational violence in general practice: a qualitative study.接待员在全科医疗中遭受职业暴力的体验:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Aug;59(565):578-83. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X453783. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
3
Patients and tests - a study into patient understanding of blood tests ordered by their doctor.患者与检查——一项关于患者对医生所开血液检查理解情况的研究。
Aust Fam Physician. 2012 Apr;41(4):241-3.
4
Communication skills and team-building for receptionists and ancillary staff.
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Jan;23(1):44-6.
5
Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety.初级保健中的信息混乱:对医生绩效和患者安全的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):745-51. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100255.
6
Safety incidents in family medicine.家庭医学中的安全事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Dec;20(12):1005-10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000105. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
7
The unspoken work of general practitioner receptionists: a re-examination of emotion management in primary care.全科医生接待员的隐性工作:初级保健中情绪管理的再审视。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 May;72(10):1583-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
8
Rudeness at work.工作中的无礼行为。
BMJ. 2010 May 19;340:c2480. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2480.
9
The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference?基层医疗中检验结果的管理:电子病历会产生影响吗?
Fam Med. 2010 May;42(5):327-33.
10
A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care.对全科医疗中分析的重大事件的回顾:对患者护理质量和安全的影响。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Sep 1;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-61.

实验室检查医嘱开立与结果管理系统:一项关于全科医疗管理人员所识别的安全风险的定性研究。

Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice.

作者信息

Bowie Paul, Halley Lyn, McKay John

机构信息

Department of Postgraduate GP Education, NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 6;4(2):e004245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004245.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004245
PMID:24503302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3918986/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore experiences and perceptions of frontline administrators involved in the systems-based management of laboratory test ordering and results handling in general medical practice.

DESIGN

Qualitative using focus group interviews.

SETTING

West of Scotland general medical practices in three National Health Service (NHS) territorial board areas.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience samples of administrators (receptionists, healthcare assistants and phlebotomists).

METHODS

Transcript data were subjected to content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 40 administrative staff were recruited. Four key themes emerged: (1) system variations and weaknesses (eg, lack of a tracking process is a known risk that needs to be addressed). (2) Doctor to administrator communication (eg, unclear information can lead to emotional impacts and additional workload). (3) Informing patients of test results (eg, levels of anxiety and uncertainty are experienced by administrators influenced by experience and test result outcome) and (4) patient follow-up and confidentiality (eg, maintaining confidentiality in a busy reception area can be challenging). The key findings were explained in terms of sociotechnical systems theory.

CONCLUSIONS

The study further confirms the safety-related problems associated with results handling systems and adds to our knowledge of the communication and psychosocial issues that can affect the health and well-being of staff and patients alike. However, opportunities exist for practices to identify barriers to safe care, and plan and implement system improvements to accommodate or mitigate the potential for human error in this complex area.

摘要

目的

探讨参与基层医疗实践中实验室检查医嘱及结果处理系统管理的一线管理人员的经验和看法。

设计

采用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。

地点

苏格兰西部三个国民保健服务(NHS)地区委员会辖区内的基层医疗实践机构。

参与者

管理人员(接待员、医疗保健助理和采血员)的便利样本。

方法

对转录数据进行内容分析。

结果

共招募了40名行政人员。出现了四个关键主题:(1)系统差异和弱点(例如,缺乏跟踪流程是一个需要解决的已知风险)。(2)医生与管理人员的沟通(例如,信息不明确会导致情绪影响和额外工作量)。(3)告知患者检查结果(例如,管理人员会因经验和检查结果而经历不同程度的焦虑和不确定性)以及(4)患者随访和保密(例如,在繁忙的接待区保持保密可能具有挑战性)。研究结果依据社会技术系统理论进行了解释。

结论

该研究进一步证实了与结果处理系统相关的安全问题,并增加了我们对可能影响工作人员和患者健康与福祉的沟通及心理社会问题的认识。然而,基层医疗实践机构有机会识别安全护理的障碍,并规划和实施系统改进措施,以适应或减轻这一复杂领域中人为错误的可能性。