JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 May;132(5):645-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5525.
Since at least the 16th century, many investigators have speculated on the presence of a specialized muscle in the front of the eye designed to somehow alter its disposition to bring about changes in focus. By the 1850s, when Hermann von Helmholtz offered the first plausible theory of accommodation, the anatomy of the ciliary muscle was well known. The credit for this knowledge is generally given to Ernst Brücke and William Bowman, who published their observations on the muscle independently in the 1840s. In fact, not only were Bowman and Brücke wrong about the role of the ciliary muscle in accommodation, and for different reasons, but they shared this distinction with at least 3 investigators who came before them. In the 3 decades before 1840, Philip Crampton, Robert Knox, and William Wallace had all zeroed in on the ciliary muscle, describing its anatomy in varying detail. If none understood its precise role in accommodation--all ignored the work of Thomas Young, who by 1800 had proved that the lens must somehow round up to achieve near vision--each deserves a share of the credit for its discovery.
自 16 世纪以来,许多研究人员推测眼睛前部存在一种专门的肌肉,旨在以某种方式改变其位置,从而引起焦点的变化。到 19 世纪 50 年代,赫尔曼·冯·赫尔姆霍茨提出了第一个合理的调节理论时,睫状肌的解剖结构已经广为人知。这方面的知识通常归功于恩斯特·布鲁克和威廉·鲍曼,他们在 19 世纪 40 年代独立发表了他们对肌肉的观察结果。事实上,不仅鲍曼和布鲁克对睫状肌在调节中的作用的看法是错误的,而且原因也不同,他们与至少 3 位在此之前的研究人员分享了这一殊荣。在 1840 年前的 30 年里,菲利普·克拉彭特、罗伯特·诺克斯和威廉·华莱士都将目光聚焦在睫状肌上,详细描述了它的解剖结构。如果没有人理解它在调节中的精确作用——他们都忽略了托马斯·杨的工作,托马斯·杨在 1800 年已经证明,晶状体必须以某种方式变圆才能实现近视力——那么每个人都应该为它的发现获得一份荣誉。