Graves Nathan C, Rettedal David D, Marshall Joshua J, Frush Katherine, Vardaxis Vassilios
College of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA. Dr. Graves is now with the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Division of Foot and Ankle, University of Florida at Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;104(1):11-8. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.1.11.
Pure Lisfranc ligament injuries have a varied clinical presentation, making them difficult to diagnose. This study seeks to understand in vivo strain characteristics of the dorsal Lisfranc ligament under clinically relevant stress loads and foot orientations measured by ultrasound.
Randomized ultrasound imaging trials were performed on 50 asymptomatic feet of 20-to-32-year-old individuals who were free of lower-extremity abnormalities. The dorsal Lisfranc ligament was ultrasound imaged under low, medium, and high stress while at 0° and 15° abducted foot orientations. Load was applied using a seated calf-raise apparatus, and a single examiner performed all of the tests. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine any significant load or position main effects or load × position interaction.
Position main effect for dorsal Lisfranc ligament length demonstrated a significant overall increase in ligament length of 0.21 mm (P < .001), which reflects a 4.03% change in ligament length between the rectus and 15° abducted orientations. Furthermore, low and medium loads demonstrated significant length increase with position effect (P = .03 and P < .001, respectively). No significant load main effect or interaction was determined.
Dorsal Lisfranc ligament length undergoes more strain in an abducted foot position at the same load compared with in a rectus foot. We advocate measuring under a medium load if possible and comparing foot positions for the maximum length changes. The participant stress loads and foot positions used are clinically feasible, which makes it possible to perform this ultrasound procedure in the clinical setting.
单纯的 Lisfranc 韧带损伤临床表现多样,难以诊断。本研究旨在了解在临床相关应力负荷和超声测量的足部方位下,背侧 Lisfranc 韧带的体内应变特征。
对 20 至 32 岁无下肢异常的 50 只无症状足部进行随机超声成像试验。在足部外展 0°和 15°时,分别在低、中、高应力下对背侧 Lisfranc 韧带进行超声成像。使用坐姿提踵装置施加负荷,由一名检查者进行所有测试。采用双向重复测量方差分析来确定任何显著的负荷或位置主效应或负荷×位置交互作用。
背侧 Lisfranc 韧带长度的位置主效应显示韧带长度总体显著增加 0.21 毫米(P <.001),这反映了在直位和外展 15°方位之间韧带长度变化了 4.03%。此外,低负荷和中等负荷下韧带长度随位置效应显著增加(分别为 P =.03 和 P <.001)。未确定显著的负荷主效应或交互作用。
与直位足部相比,在相同负荷下,外展位足部的背侧 Lisfranc 韧带承受更多应变。我们主张尽可能在中等负荷下进行测量,并比较足部位置以获取最大长度变化。所使用的参与者应力负荷和足部位置在临床上是可行的,这使得在临床环境中进行这种超声检查成为可能。