Smedes Fred, van der Salm Arjan, Koel Gerard, Oosterveld Frits
Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, Enschede, the Netherlands; Practice for Physical Therapy, Losser, the Netherlands.
Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Expertise Centre for Health, Social Care & Technology, Enschede, the Netherlands.
J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):209-15; quiz 216. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
Prospective pilot cohort study, quasi-experimental design.
Restricted hand mobility, limitation in activities and participation, due to relative immobilization of the hemiplegic hand are frequently reported after stroke.
To establish whether manual mobilization of the wrist has an additional value in the treatment of the hemiplegic hand.
Eighteen patients received treatment twice a week for a period of 6 weeks. Both treatment groups received therapy based upon the Dutch guidelines for stroke. In the intervention group, a 10-min manual mobilization of the wrist was integrated. The primary outcomes were active and passive wrist mobility and activity limitation. The secondary outcomes were spasticity, grip strength, and pain. Data were collected at 0, 6 and 10 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using the Friedman's test, related t-test, Wilcoxon test, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test.
Statistically significant differences were found in the intervention group; between T0 and T2 measurements in active wrist extension (+18°; p < 0.001), in passive wrist extension (+15°; p < 0.001), and in the Frenchay Arm Test (+2 points, 18%; p = 0.038). This significant improvement was not found in the control group. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in active and passive wrist extension (p < 0.001; p = 0.002), as well as a change in Frenchay Arm Test (p = 0.01).
This study suggests that manual mobilization of the wrist has a positive influence on the recovery of the hemiplegic hand. Replication of the results is needed in a large scale randomized controlled trial.
前瞻性试点队列研究,准实验设计。
中风后经常报告因偏瘫手相对固定导致手部活动受限、活动和参与受限。
确定手腕手动松动术在偏瘫手治疗中是否具有额外价值。
18名患者每周接受两次治疗,为期6周。两个治疗组均接受基于荷兰中风指南的治疗。干预组增加了10分钟的手腕手动松动术。主要结局指标为主动和被动手腕活动度以及活动受限情况。次要结局指标为痉挛、握力和疼痛。在第0、6和10周收集数据。使用弗里德曼检验、相关t检验、威尔科克森检验、独立t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验进行统计分析。
干预组有统计学显著差异;在T0和T2测量之间,主动手腕伸展增加了18°(p < 0.001),被动手腕伸展增加了15°(p < 0.001),并且在法国ay上肢测试中增加了2分(18%;p = 0.038)。对照组未发现这种显著改善。两组在主动和被动手腕伸展方面存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001;p = 0.002),以及法国ay上肢测试有变化(p = 0.01)。
本研究表明手腕手动松动术对偏瘫手的恢复有积极影响。需要在大规模随机对照试验中重复这些结果。
4级。