Suppr超能文献

神经系统疾病患者肌肉挛缩的非手术治疗选择:一项荟萃分析的系统评价

Nonsurgical Treatment Options for Muscle Contractures in Individuals With Neurologic Disorders: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Svane Christian, Nielsen Jens Bo, Lorentzen Jakob

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.

Elsass Foundation, Charlottenlund, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jan 13;3(1):100104. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100104. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether nonsurgical treatment can reduce muscle contractures in individuals with neurologic disorders. The primary outcome measure was muscle contractures measured as joint mobility or passive stiffness.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database in June-July 2019 and again in July 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

The search resulted in 8020 records, which were screened by 2 authors based on our patient, intervention, comparison, outcome criteria. We included controlled trials of nonsurgical interventions administered to treat muscle contractures in individuals with neurologic disorders.

DATA EXTRACTION

Authors, participant characteristics, intervention details, and joint mobility/passive stiffness before and after intervention were extracted. We assessed trials for risk of bias using the Downs and Black checklist. We conducted meta-analyses investigating the short-term effect on joint mobility using a random-effects model with the pooled effect from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the primary outcome. The minimal clinically important effect was set at 5°.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 70 trials (57 RCTs) were eligible for inclusion. Stretch had a pooled effect of 3° (95% CI, 1-4°; prediction interval (PI)=-2 to 7°; =66%; <.001), and robot-assisted rehabilitation had an effect of 1 (95% CI, 0-2; PI=-8 to 9; =73%; =.03). We found no effect of shockwave therapy (=.56), physical activity (=.27), electrical stimulation (=.11), or botulinum toxin (=.13). Although trials were generally of moderate to high quality according to the Downs and Black checklist, only 18 of the 70 trials used objective measures of muscle contractures. In 23 trials, nonobjective measures were used without use of assessor-blinding.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find convincing evidence supporting the use of any nonsurgical treatment option. We recommend that controlled trials using objective measures of muscle contractures and a sufficiently large number of participants be performed.

摘要

目的

探讨非手术治疗能否减少神经系统疾病患者的肌肉挛缩。主要结局指标为以关节活动度或被动僵硬度衡量的肌肉挛缩。

数据来源

2019年6月至7月以及2020年7月检索了Embase、MEDLINE、护理学与联合健康累积索引和物理治疗证据数据库。

研究选择

检索结果得到8020条记录,由2位作者根据我们的患者、干预措施、对照、结局标准进行筛选。我们纳入了针对神经系统疾病患者肌肉挛缩进行治疗的非手术干预对照试验。

数据提取

提取作者、参与者特征、干预细节以及干预前后的关节活动度/被动僵硬度。我们使用唐斯和布莱克清单评估试验的偏倚风险。我们进行了荟萃分析,采用随机效应模型研究对关节活动度的短期影响,将随机对照试验(RCT)的合并效应作为主要结局。最小临床重要效应设定为5°。

数据综合

共有70项试验(57项RCT)符合纳入标准。拉伸的合并效应为3°(95%CI,1 - 4°;预测区间(PI)= -2至7°;I² = 66%;P <.001),机器人辅助康复的效应为1°(95%CI,0 - 2°;PI = -8至9°;I² = 73%;P =.03)。我们未发现冲击波疗法(P =.56)、体育活动(P =.27)、电刺激(P =.11)或肉毒杆菌毒素(P =.13)有效果。尽管根据唐斯和布莱克清单,试验总体质量为中等至高,但70项试验中只有18项使用了肌肉挛缩的客观测量方法。在23项试验中,使用了非客观测量方法且未采用评估者盲法。

结论

我们未找到支持使用任何非手术治疗方案的令人信服的证据。我们建议开展使用肌肉挛缩客观测量方法且有足够数量参与者的对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b34/7984980/adde3d2c9392/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验