• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[飞秒激光与机械微型角膜刀用于准分子原位角膜磨镶术制作角膜瓣的比较]

[Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK flap creation].

作者信息

Hasimoto Alexander Rodrigo, Gomes Manuela Fiorese Benites, de Siqueira Marcelo Alves Vilar, Moreira Hamilton

出版信息

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013 Nov-Dec;76(6):335-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492013000600002.

DOI:10.1590/s0004-27492013000600002
PMID:24510077
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess LASIK flaps made by femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome.

METHODS

Clinical, prospective, randomized, masked study of 32 eyes (16 patients). Both eyes of all patients were operated, each patient underwent different techniques for lasik. Microkeratome Hansatome (TM) Bausch & Lomb (group microkeratome) was used in one eye and femtosecond laser Femto LDV(TM) Ziemer (group femtosecond) was used for the fellow eye. Patients were selected from the Refractive Surgery service of the Eye Hospital of Paraná between July 2010 and September 2010. Inclusion criteria were myopia less than 6.00 D, astigmatism less than 3.00 D, hyperopia less than 5.00 D, stable refraction over one year, corneal diameter smaller than 11 mm, discontinuation of contact lenses seven days before the preoperative evaluation, corrected visual acuity of at least 20/20. Eyes were randomly allocated for each technique. The studied variables were: visual acuity with and without correction, residual refractive error, high order aberrations, low contrast visual acuity, complications and subjective patient preference.

RESULTS

All studied variables were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We could not demonstrate any difference between the studied groups.

摘要

目的

评估飞秒激光和机械微型角膜刀制作的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)角膜瓣。

方法

对32只眼(16例患者)进行临床、前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。所有患者的双眼均接受手术,每位患者的一只眼采用不同的LASIK技术。一只眼使用博士伦公司的Hansatome(TM)微型角膜刀(微型角膜刀组),另一只眼使用齐默公司的Femto LDV(TM)飞秒激光(飞秒激光组)。患者选自2010年7月至2010年9月巴拉那眼科医院屈光手术科。纳入标准为近视度数小于6.00 D、散光度数小于3.00 D、远视度数小于5.00 D、屈光稳定超过一年、角膜直径小于11 mm、术前评估前7天停止佩戴隐形眼镜、矫正视力至少为20/20。将眼睛随机分配至每种技术组。研究的变量包括:矫正和未矫正视力、残余屈光不正、高阶像差、低对比度视力、并发症以及患者主观偏好。

结果

两组之间所有研究变量均相似。

结论

我们未能证明研究组之间存在任何差异。

相似文献

1
[Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK flap creation].[飞秒激光与机械微型角膜刀用于准分子原位角膜磨镶术制作角膜瓣的比较]
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013 Nov-Dec;76(6):335-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492013000600002.
2
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.飞秒激光与机械微型角膜刀用于准分子原位角膜磨镶术的随机对照研究。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.057. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
3
Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.比较飞秒激光制瓣和微型角膜刀制瓣在对侧眼诱导像差的随机前瞻性临床研究:对波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术的潜在影响
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.037.
4
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.与使用飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,使用机械微型角膜刀进行的成人近视或近视散光准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;4(4):CD012946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2.
5
Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.机械法准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)制作角膜瓣和飞秒激光制作角膜瓣后角膜曲率变化的测量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.023.
6
Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome.激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜像差与视力:飞秒激光与机械角膜刀。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 May;149(5):785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
7
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.飞秒激光与机械角膜刀准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的比较
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.019. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
8
Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.比较 Ziemer FEMTO LDV 飞秒激光和 Moria M2 机械角膜刀。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Mar;28(3):189-94. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120208-01.
9
Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.用于近视准分子原位角膜磨镶术中制作角膜瓣的两种飞秒激光的比较:一年的结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Apr;41(4):740-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.038.
10
Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.波前引导与波前优化的 LASIK 治疗近视:前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;157(6):1170-1178.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.037. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser.近视性准分子原位角膜磨镶术的结果:使用同一台准分子激光对三种不同飞秒激光与一种机械微型角膜刀的比较。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1047-1066. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00486-y. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.与使用飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,使用机械微型角膜刀进行的成人近视或近视散光准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;4(4):CD012946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2.
3
Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser.
使用微型角膜刀和飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后的视力、屈光效果及满意度比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 May 23;11:1009-1014. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S137451. eCollection 2017.
4
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.飞秒激光与机械微型角膜刀辅助制作角膜瓣用于准分子原位角膜磨镶术:一项前瞻性、随机、双眼对照研究。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep 22;8:1883-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S68124. eCollection 2014.