Tran Dan B, Sarayba Melvin A, Bor Zsolt, Garufis Carrie, Duh Yi-Jing, Soltes Charles R, Juhasz Tibor, Kurtz Ron M
Coastal Vision Medical Group, Inc., University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.037.
To measure and compare the changes in objective wavefront aberration and subjective manifest refraction after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap creation with a mechanical microkeratome and a femtosecond laser.
Private practice refractive surgery center, Irvine, California, USA.
This randomized prospective study comprised 9 patients (18 eyes) treated with a 2-step LASIK procedure: lamellar keratectomy with a Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb) or the IntraLase femtosecond laser in fellow eyes followed by non-wavefront-guided (standard) excimer laser treatment with the Technolas 217A (Bausch & Lomb) excimer laser 10 weeks later. Fellow eyes were matched to within 0.75 diopter (D) sphere and 0.50 D cylinder. Patients were followed for 3 months after excimer laser treatment. Preoperative and post-flap creation wavefront aberrometry using a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer and manifest refraction were compared between the 2 groups. The same tests were performed 3 months after excimer laser ablation.
Statistically significant changes were seen in defocus wavefront aberrations after Hansatome (P=.004) and IntraLase (P=.008) flap creation. A hyperopic shift in manifest refraction was noted in the Hansatome group after the creation of the corneal flap (P=.04); no statistically significant changes in manifest refraction were seen in the IntraLase group. Statistically significant changes in total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (trefoil and quadrafoil Zernike terms) were seen after flap creation in the Hansatome group (P=.02). No significant changes in HOAs were noted after flap creation in the IntraLase group. After the flap was relifted and standard excimer laser ablation was performed, a statistically significant increase in coma occurred in the Hansatome group (P=.008). Standard refractive outcomes in the 2 groups were similar.
The creation of the LASIK flap alone can modify the eye's optical characteristics in low-order aberrations and HOAs. A significant increase in HOAs was seen in the Hansatome group but not in the IntraLase group. This may have significant clinical implications in wavefront-guided LASIK treatments, which are based on measurements made before flap creation.
测量并比较使用机械微型角膜刀和飞秒激光制作准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)角膜瓣后,客观波前像差和主观显验光的变化。
美国加利福尼亚州欧文市的一家私立屈光手术中心。
这项随机前瞻性研究纳入了9例患者(18只眼),采用两步LASIK手术治疗:一眼用Hansatome微型角膜刀(博士伦)或IntraLase飞秒激光进行板层角膜切除术,10周后另一眼采用Technolas 217A(博士伦)准分子激光进行非波前引导(标准)准分子激光治疗。双眼球镜度数相差不超过0.75屈光度(D),柱镜度数相差不超过0.50 D。准分子激光治疗后对患者随访3个月。比较两组在制作角膜瓣前后使用Hartmann-Shack像差仪进行的波前像差测量和显验光结果。在准分子激光消融术后3个月进行相同的检查。
使用Hansatome(P = 0.004)和IntraLase(P = 0.008)制作角膜瓣后,离焦波前像差出现了具有统计学意义的变化。在Hansatome组制作角膜瓣后,显验光出现了远视性偏移(P = 0.04);IntraLase组显验光未出现具有统计学意义的变化。在Hansatome组制作角膜瓣后,总高阶像差(HOAs)(三叶和四叶泽尼克项)出现了具有统计学意义的变化(P = 0.02)。IntraLase组制作角膜瓣后HOAs未出现显著变化。在掀起角膜瓣并进行标准准分子激光消融后,Hansatome组彗差出现了具有统计学意义的增加(P = 0.008)。两组的标准屈光结果相似。
单独制作LASIK角膜瓣可改变眼睛在低阶像差和高阶像差方面的光学特性。Hansatome组高阶像差显著增加,而IntraLase组未出现这种情况。这可能对基于制作角膜瓣前测量的波前引导LASIK治疗具有重要的临床意义。