• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垂直和水平排列的视觉干扰物对听觉引导的眼球跳动的影响。

The influence of vertically and horizontally aligned visual distractors on aurally guided saccadic eye movements.

作者信息

Ten Brink A F, Nijboer T C W, Van der Stoep N, Van der Stigchel S

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2014 Apr;232(4):1357-66. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3854-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-014-3854-8
PMID:24510352
Abstract

Eye movements towards a new target can be guided or disrupted by input from multiple modalities. The degree of oculomotor competition evoked by a distractor depends on both distractor and target properties, such as distractor salience or certainty regarding the target location. The ability to localize the target is particularly important when studying saccades made towards auditory targets, since determination of elevation and azimuth of a sound are based on different processes, and these processes may be affected independently by a distractor. We investigated the effects of a visual distractor on saccadic eye movements made to an auditory target in a two-dimensional plane. Results showed that the competition evoked by a vertical visual distractor was stronger compared with a horizontal visual distractor. The eye movements that were not captured by the vertical visual distractor were still influenced by it: a deviation of endpoints was seen in the direction of the visual distractor. Furthermore, the interference evoked by a high-contrast visual distractor was stronger compared with low-contrast visual stimuli, which was reflected by a faster initiation of an eye movement towards the high-contrast visual distractor and a stronger shift of endpoints in the direction of the high-contrast visual distractor. Together, these findings show that the influence of a visual distractor on aurally guided eye movements depends strongly on its location relative to the target, and to a lesser extent, on stimulus contrast.

摘要

朝向新目标的眼球运动可由多种感觉模态的输入引导或干扰。干扰物引发的眼球运动竞争程度取决于干扰物和目标的属性,如干扰物的显著性或目标位置的确定性。在研究朝向听觉目标的扫视时,定位目标的能力尤为重要,因为声音仰角和方位角的确定基于不同的过程,而这些过程可能会受到干扰物的独立影响。我们在二维平面中研究了视觉干扰物对朝向听觉目标的扫视眼动的影响。结果表明,垂直视觉干扰物引发的竞争比水平视觉干扰物更强。未被垂直视觉干扰物捕捉到的眼球运动仍受到其影响:在视觉干扰物的方向上可观察到终点的偏差。此外,高对比度视觉干扰物引发的干扰比低对比度视觉刺激更强,这表现为朝向高对比度视觉干扰物的眼球运动启动更快,以及终点在高对比度视觉干扰物方向上的偏移更强。总之,这些发现表明,视觉干扰物对听觉引导的眼球运动的影响很大程度上取决于其相对于目标的位置,在较小程度上取决于刺激对比度。

相似文献

1
The influence of vertically and horizontally aligned visual distractors on aurally guided saccadic eye movements.垂直和水平排列的视觉干扰物对听觉引导的眼球跳动的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Apr;232(4):1357-66. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3854-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
2
Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors.双峰干扰物的动眼干扰
Vision Res. 2016 Jun;123:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 19.
3
Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.扫视语境指示视觉固视内的信息处理:来自相关事件电位和眼动分析的分心效应证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Apr;80(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
Saccades to remembered targets: the effects of smooth pursuit and illusory stimulus motion.对记忆目标的扫视:平稳跟踪和虚幻刺激运动的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3617-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3617.
5
Inhibition of saccade initiation improves saccade accuracy: The role of local and remote visual distractors in the control of saccadic eye movements.抑制眼跳启动能提高眼跳准确性:局部和远距离视觉干扰在眼跳运动控制中的作用。
J Vis. 2021 Mar 1;21(3):17. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.3.17.
6
Differences in distractor-induced deviation between horizontal and vertical saccade trajectories.水平和垂直扫视轨迹中干扰物诱发偏差的差异。
Neuroreport. 2008 Jan 22;19(2):251-4. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f49b3f.
7
Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.对扫视目标选择的早期自上而下控制:来自系统显著性差异操纵的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):367-82. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0592-0.
8
Effects of reward on oculomotor control.奖励对眼球运动控制的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Nov 1;116(5):2453-2466. doi: 10.1152/jn.00498.2016. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Temporal dynamics of saccadic distraction.扫视干扰的时间动态
J Vis. 2009 Aug 28;9(9):17.1-14. doi: 10.1167/9.9.17.
10
Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.对扫视落点的自动和有意影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Aug 1;118(2):1105-1122. doi: 10.1152/jn.00141.2017. Epub 2017 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors.双峰干扰物的动眼干扰
Vision Res. 2016 Jun;123:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 19.
2
Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.时空配置的先验知识有助于跨模态扫视反应:一项双胞胎分析。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul;234(7):2059-2076. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4609-5. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Lack of multisensory integration in hemianopia: no influence of visual stimuli on aurally guided saccades to the blind hemifield.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-lateralized auditory input enhances averaged vectors in the oculomotor system.非侧化听觉输入增强了眼动系统中的平均向量。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Sep;221(4):377-84. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3178-5. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
2
Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance.影响人类绩效中多感觉整合的空间和时间刺激因素之间的相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 May;219(1):121-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3072-1. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
3
A global effect of capture saccades.捕捉眼跳的全局效应。
偏盲中多感官整合的缺失:视觉刺激对向盲侧半视野的听觉引导扫视无影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0122054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122054. eCollection 2015.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Apr;210(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2602-6. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
4
Recent advances in the study of saccade trajectory deviations.扫视轨迹偏差研究的最新进展。
Vision Res. 2010 Aug 6;50(17):1619-27. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.028. Epub 2010 May 27.
5
The time course of vertical, horizontal and oblique saccade trajectories: Evidence for greater distractor interference during vertical saccades.垂直、水平和斜向扫视轨迹的时间进程:垂直扫视期间干扰物干扰更大的证据。
Vision Res. 2010 Apr 21;50(9):829-37. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
6
The imbalance of oculomotor capture in unilateral visual neglect.单侧视觉忽略中的眼球运动捕获失衡。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):186-97. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
7
Time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for saccadic reaction time: effect of auditory masker level on visual-auditory spatial interaction in elevation.用于眼跳反应时间的整合时间窗口(TWIN)模型:听觉掩蔽水平对垂直方向上视觉-听觉空间交互作用的影响
Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0091-8. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Multisensory-mediated auditory localization.多感官介导的听觉定位
Perception. 2007;36(10):1477-85. doi: 10.1068/p5846.
9
Differences in distractor-induced deviation between horizontal and vertical saccade trajectories.水平和垂直扫视轨迹中干扰物诱发偏差的差异。
Neuroreport. 2008 Jan 22;19(2):251-4. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f49b3f.
10
Biased competition and visual search: the role of luminance and size contrast.偏向竞争与视觉搜索:亮度和大小对比度的作用。
Psychol Res. 2008 Jan;72(1):106-13. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0077-z. Epub 2006 Aug 8.