Farooqui Muhammad Assad, Tan Yock-Theng, Bilger Marcel, Finkelstein Eric A
Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 10;14:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-141.
There is extensive evidence that regular physical activity confers numerous health benefits. Despite this, high rates of physical inactivity prevail among older adults. This study aimed to ascertain if incentives could be effective in motivating physical activity through improving uptake of walking programs, either with or without an enrolment fee to cover corresponding costs.
A discrete-choice conjoint survey was fielded to a national sample of older adults in Singapore. Each respondent was given ten pairs of hypothetical walking programs and asked to choose the option they preferred. Each option varied along several dimensions, including the level and type (cash, voucher, or health savings credit) of incentive and an enrolment fee. For each option, they were asked how likely they would be to join their preferred program. A random utility model (RUM) was used to analyze the responses.
Results suggest that a free 6-month program with a $500 cash incentive would generate enrolment rates of 58.5%; charging $50 to enroll lowers this to 55.7%. In terms of incentive type, cash payments were the most preferred incentive but not significantly different from supermarket vouchers. Both were preferred to health savings credits and sporting goods vouchers. Concerns of adverse selection were minimal because those who were inactive represented at least 72% of new participants for any offered program(s) and were the majority.
Study results demonstrate the potential for even modest incentives to increase program uptake among inactive older adults. Moreover, although cash was the most preferred option, supermarket vouchers, which could potentially be purchased at a discount, were a close alternative. Results also suggest that an enrolment fee is a viable option to offset the costs of incentives as it has only minimal impact on participation.
有大量证据表明,定期进行体育活动能带来诸多健康益处。尽管如此,老年人身体活动不足的比例仍然很高。本研究旨在确定激励措施是否能通过提高步行计划的参与率来有效促进体育活动,无论是否收取报名费以覆盖相应成本。
对新加坡全国范围内的老年人群体进行了一项离散选择联合调查。每位受访者会收到十对假设的步行计划,并被要求选择他们更喜欢的选项。每个选项在几个维度上有所不同,包括激励的水平和类型(现金、代金券或健康储蓄积分)以及报名费。对于每个选项,他们被问及加入其首选计划的可能性有多大。使用随机效用模型(RUM)来分析这些回答。
结果表明,一个免费的为期6个月且有500美元现金激励的计划将产生58.5%的参与率;收取50美元的报名费会将其降至55.7%。在激励类型方面,现金支付是最受欢迎的激励方式,但与超市代金券没有显著差异。两者都比健康储蓄积分和体育用品代金券更受欢迎。逆向选择的担忧最小,因为不活跃的人在任何提供的计划的新参与者中至少占72%,并且是大多数。
研究结果表明,即使是适度的激励措施也有可能提高不活跃老年人对计划的参与率。此外,虽然现金是最受欢迎的选择,但超市代金券(有可能以折扣价购买)是一个相近的替代选择。结果还表明,报名费是抵消激励成本的可行选择,因为它对参与率的影响很小。