Tilburg University, Department of Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0219112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219112. eCollection 2019.
The preferences of diabetes type 2 patients and cardiovascular disease patients for a financial incentive added to a specified combined lifestyle intervention were investigated.
A discrete choice experiment questionnaire was filled out by 290 diabetes type 2 patients (response rate 29.9%). Panel-mixed-logit models were used to estimate the preferences for a financial incentive. Potential uptake rates of different financial incentives and relative importance scores of the included attributes were estimated. Included attributes and levels were: form of the incentive (cash money and different types of vouchers), value of the incentive (ranging from 15 to 100 euros), moment the incentive is received (start, halfway, after finishing the intervention) and prerequisite for receiving the incentive (registration, attendance or results at group or individual level).
Prerequisites for receiving the financial incentive were the most important attribute, according to the respondents. Potential uptake rates for different financial incentives ranged between 37.9% and 58.8%. The latter uptake rate was associated with a financial incentive consisting of cash money with a value of €100 that is handed out after completing the lifestyle program with the prerequisite that the participant attended at least 75% of the scheduled meetings.
The potential uptake of the different financial incentives varied between 37.9% and 58.8%. The value of the incentive does not significantly influence the potential uptake. However, the potential uptake and associated potential effect of the financial incentive is influenced by the type of financial incentive. The preferred type of incentive is €100 in cash money, awarded after completing the lifestyle program if the participant attended at least 75% of the scheduled meetings.
研究了 2 型糖尿病患者和心血管疾病患者对特定联合生活方式干预加金融激励的偏好。
290 名 2 型糖尿病患者（回应率 29.9%）填写了离散选择实验问卷。使用面板混合对数模型估计对金融激励的偏好。估计了不同金融激励的潜在吸收率和包含属性的相对重要性得分。包含的属性和水平是：激励形式（现金和不同类型的代金券）、激励价值（从 15 欧元到 100 欧元不等）、激励接收时间（开始、中途、干预结束后）以及接收激励的前提条件（注册、参加或小组或个人层面的结果）。
根据受访者的说法，接收金融激励的前提条件是最重要的属性。不同金融激励的潜在吸收率在 37.9%至 58.8%之间。后者的吸收率与一种金融激励相关联，该激励包括价值为 100 欧元的现金，在完成生活方式计划后发放，前提是参与者参加了至少 75%的预定会议。
不同金融激励的潜在吸收率在 37.9%至 58.8%之间。激励的价值不会显著影响潜在吸收率。然而，金融激励的潜在吸收率和相关潜在效果受金融激励的类型影响。首选的激励类型是 100 欧元现金，在完成生活方式计划后发放，如果参与者参加了至少 75%的预定会议。
