Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan,
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jul;28(7):2120-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3443-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
The efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been reported mainly from Japanese referral centers. However, ESD is technically difficult and associated with a higher risk of adverse events than endoscopic mucosal resection, especially for novices performing colorectal ESD with little experience in gastric ESD. The current study evaluated the results of colorectal ESD during the clinical learning curve by retrospectively examining the results of colorectal ESD performed by four endoscopists who had experience with fewer than five cases of gastric ESD.
The study retrospectively investigated the first 20 cases managed by each endoscopist, for a total of 80 cases. The main outcome measurements were procedural time, en bloc resection rate with tumor-free margins (R0 resection rate), and adverse events rate. From among clinicopathologic characteristics, factors that affected main outcome measurements were identified.
Of the 80 cases (56 colonic and 24 rectal lesions; 44 granular laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) and 23 nongranular LSTs, 5 depressed, and 8 protruding), 54 cases (67.5%) had resection using a standard tip-type knife, and 26 cases (32.5%) had resection using a small scissors-type knife. The mean tumor diameter was 34.9 ± 14.1 mm, and the mean procedural time was 108.8 ± 53.4 min. The resection in 75 cases (93.8%) was performed en bloc, and the R0 resection rate was 75% (60/80). Perforation occurred in six cases (7.5%) and postoperative hemorrhage in three cases (3.8%). Multivariate analyses showed that colonic lesions and larger lesions (≥40 mm) were significantly associated with prolonged procedural time (≥90 min). Use of the scissors-type knife was significantly associated with a higher R0 resection rate. Perforation occurred only in colonic lesions.
For novices in colorectal ESD, beginning with rectal and smaller lesions may be advisable. Also, using scissors-type knives may increase the R0 resection rate.
结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的疗效主要来自日本转诊中心的报道。然而,ESD 技术难度较大,与内镜黏膜切除术相比,其不良事件风险更高,尤其是对于经验较少的结直肠 ESD 新手,他们在胃 ESD 方面经验较少。本研究通过回顾性检查 4 名内镜医生的结直肠 ESD 结果,评估了临床学习曲线期间结直肠 ESD 的结果,这 4 名内镜医生的胃 ESD 经验均少于 5 例。
本研究回顾性调查了每位内镜医生的前 20 例患者,共 80 例。主要的结局测量是操作时间、无肿瘤边缘的整块切除率(R0 切除率)和不良事件发生率。从临床病理特征中,确定了影响主要结局测量的因素。
在 80 例患者中(56 例结肠和 24 例直肠病变;44 例颗粒型侧向扩展肿瘤(LST)和 23 例非颗粒型 LST、5 例凹陷型和 8 例隆起型),54 例(67.5%)采用标准尖端式刀进行切除,26 例(32.5%)采用小剪刀式刀进行切除。肿瘤平均直径为 34.9±14.1mm,平均操作时间为 108.8±53.4min。75 例(93.8%)整块切除,R0 切除率为 75%(60/80)。6 例(7.5%)发生穿孔,3 例(3.8%)发生术后出血。多变量分析显示,结肠病变和较大病变(≥40mm)与操作时间延长(≥90min)显著相关。使用剪刀式刀与更高的 R0 切除率显著相关。穿孔仅发生在结肠病变中。
对于结直肠 ESD 的新手,从直肠和较小的病变开始可能是明智的。此外,使用剪刀式刀可能会提高 R0 切除率。