Lin T-C, Yang C-Y, Kao Yang Y-H, Lin S-J
Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.1 University Road, Tainan, 70101, Taiwan.
Osteoporos Int. 2014 May;25(5):1503-11. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2624-6. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
Evidence of the incidence and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in Asian osteoporosis populations receiving different osteoporosis medications is lacking. We found that there is no excess incidence of or risk for ONJ in osteoporosis patients >50 years old using alendronate as compared with patients using raloxifene or calcitonin under real-world conditions in Taiwan.
To provide information on ONJ in Asian populations, this study compares the incidence and risk of ONJ between patients receiving alendronate and those receiving non-bisphosphonate osteoporosis medications in Taiwan.
Enrollees in the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2003 to 2007, aged above 50 years, with vertebral/hip fracture, and new to osteoporosis therapy were recruited. Patients with Paget's disease or cancer during the baseline period were excluded. Patients were classified into either the alendronate or the calcitonin/raloxifene (control) group according to their exposure during follow-up. Previously proposed possible ONJ diagnosis codes were adopted as potential ONJ cases, but qualifying cases also had a repeated ONJ diagnosis within 8 weeks of the first diagnosis and received one or more broad-spectrum oral antibiotics. Cox modeling compared the risk of ONJ between the alendronate and the control groups, which were matched using propensity scores. Results were examined in series sensitivity analyses, including different cumulative dose groups.
We found 25 potential ONJ cases in the alendronate (N = 18,030) and 21 in the control groups (N = 25,615). Over the 6-year follow-up period, no increased risk of ONJ in the alendronate group in the original (hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47-1.58) or propensity score-matched cohorts (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.44-1.69) was found. All comparison groups exhibited a similar incidence of ONJ, ranging from 6.9 to 8.2/10,000 person-years.
Under real-world conditions, there is no excess risk for ONJ in osteoporosis patients >50 years old using alendronate as compared with patients using raloxifene or calcitonin.
缺乏亚洲骨质疏松症患者使用不同骨质疏松症药物时颌骨坏死(ONJ)发病率和风险的证据。我们发现在台湾的实际情况下,与使用雷洛昔芬或降钙素的患者相比,50岁以上使用阿仑膦酸钠的骨质疏松症患者中ONJ的发病率或风险并无增加。
为了提供亚洲人群中ONJ的相关信息,本研究比较了台湾接受阿仑膦酸钠治疗的患者与接受非双膦酸盐类骨质疏松症药物治疗的患者之间ONJ的发病率和风险。
招募2003年至2007年国家健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD)中年龄在50岁以上、有椎体/髋部骨折且新接受骨质疏松症治疗的参与者。排除基线期患有佩吉特病或癌症的患者。根据随访期间的暴露情况将患者分为阿仑膦酸钠组或降钙素/雷洛昔芬(对照组)。采用先前提出的可能的ONJ诊断代码作为潜在的ONJ病例,但符合条件的病例还需在首次诊断后8周内有重复的ONJ诊断,并接受一种或多种广谱口服抗生素治疗。Cox模型比较了阿仑膦酸钠组和对照组之间ONJ的风险,两组使用倾向得分进行匹配。在包括不同累积剂量组的系列敏感性分析中检查结果。
我们在阿仑膦酸钠组(N = 18,030)中发现25例潜在ONJ病例,在对照组(N = 25,615)中发现21例。在6年的随访期内,在原始队列(风险比(HR),0.87;95%置信区间(CI),0.47 - 1.58)或倾向得分匹配队列(HR,0.86;95%CI,0.44 - 1.69)中,阿仑膦酸钠组ONJ风险均未增加。所有比较组的ONJ发病率相似,范围为6.9至8.2/10,000人年。
在实际情况下,与使用雷洛昔芬或降钙素的患者相比,50岁以上使用阿仑膦酸钠的骨质疏松症患者发生ONJ的风险并无增加。