• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究奥美沙坦及其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率之间的关联。

Examining the association of olmesartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers with overall and cause-specific mortality.

作者信息

Lin Jou-Wei, Chang Chia-Hsuin, Caffrey James L, Wu Li-Chiu, Lai Mei-Shu

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Rd, Section 1, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):968-76. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02550. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02550
PMID:24516110
Abstract

Concerns about an increased cardiovascular risk with the angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan, prompted the current study to examine associations between olmesartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers with overall and cause-specific mortalities. We collected patients who started to use losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, candesartan, telmisartan, and olmesartan between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2009, from Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database. Prescribed drug types, dosage, and other clinical information were collected. Overall mortality and cause-specific mortality were ascertained through linkages with Taiwan's National Death Registry. Two follow-up analyses, labeled intention-to-treat and as-treated, were conducted. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using losartan as the reference group. A total of 690 463 subjects were included, with a mean follow-up ranging from a low of 2.8 years for olmesartan to a high of 4.1 years for irbesartan. Subjects who began with valsartan had a modest but significantly increased risk of overall mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) compared with losartan. Irbesartan (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), candesartan (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99), telmisartan (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96), and olmesartan (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97) were associated with a slightly lower overall mortality risk than losartan. The analysis indicates that the differences in mortality risk among individual angiotensin receptor blockers were only marginal and thus less likely to be clinically important. Although uncontrolled confounding might still exist, olmesartan does not seem to increase cardiovascular risk compared with losartan.

摘要

对血管紧张素受体阻滞剂奥美沙坦心血管风险增加的担忧促使本研究调查奥美沙坦及其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率之间的关联。我们从台湾国民健康保险理赔数据库中收集了2004年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间开始使用氯沙坦、缬沙坦、厄贝沙坦、坎地沙坦、替米沙坦和奥美沙坦的患者。收集了处方药类型、剂量及其他临床信息。通过与台湾国民死亡登记处的关联确定全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率。进行了两项随访分析,分别标记为意向性治疗分析和实际治疗分析。使用Cox比例风险回归模型,以氯沙坦作为参照组计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。总共纳入了690463名受试者,平均随访时间从奥美沙坦的2.8年到厄贝沙坦的4.1年不等。与氯沙坦相比,起始使用缬沙坦的受试者全因死亡率风险有适度但显著的增加(HR,1.04;95%CI,1.02 - 1.06)。厄贝沙坦(HR,0.96;95%CI,0.94 - 0.99)、坎地沙坦(HR,0.95;95%CI,0.92 - 0.99)、替米沙坦(HR,0.93;95%CI,0.90 - 0.96)和奥美沙坦(HR,0.93;95%CI,0.88 - 0.97)与比氯沙坦略低的全因死亡率风险相关。分析表明,各血管紧张素受体阻滞剂之间的死亡率风险差异仅为边际差异,因此在临床上不太可能具有重要意义。尽管可能仍然存在未控制的混杂因素,但与氯沙坦相比,奥美沙坦似乎不会增加心血管风险。

相似文献

1
Examining the association of olmesartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers with overall and cause-specific mortality.研究奥美沙坦及其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率之间的关联。
Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):968-76. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02550. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
2
Comparative effectiveness of olmesartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers in diabetes mellitus: retrospective cohort study.奥美沙坦与其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在糖尿病中的比较疗效:回顾性队列研究
Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):977-83. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02855. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
3
Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect?血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂治疗心力衰竭:是否存在类效应?
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Apr;27(4):526-34. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.4.526.
4
Olmesartan compared with other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: head-to-head trials.与其他血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂相比的奥美沙坦:头对头试验。
Clin Ther. 2004;26 Suppl A:A33-7. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90144-0.
5
Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.使用24小时动态血压监测评估降压疗效:奥美沙坦酯、氯沙坦钾、缬沙坦和厄贝沙坦的比较
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(1):41-50. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505010-00006.
6
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂预防糖尿病患者大血管疾病的效果比较:基于人群的队列研究。
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 3;185(12):1035-41. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121771. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
7
Comparative effectiveness of individual angiotensin receptor blockers on risk of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.比较个体血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在慢性心力衰竭患者死亡率风险中的作用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Mar;21(3):233-40. doi: 10.1002/pds.2175. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
8
Cardiology patient page. Angiotensin receptor blockers.
Circulation. 2003 Jun 24;107(24):e215-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072344.12827.13.
9
Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study.血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂对2型糖尿病高血压患者血清尿酸的比较影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Nov 4;12:159. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-159.
10
Maintaining goal blood pressures after switching from olmesartan to other angiotensin receptor blockers.从奥美沙坦转换为其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂后维持目标血压。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Dec;15(12):888-92. doi: 10.1111/jch.12197. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term mortality and cardiovascular events of seven angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: Analysis of a national real-world database: A retrospective cohort study.七种植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗高血压患者的长期死亡率和心血管事件:一项基于全国真实世界数据库的分析:一项回顾性队列研究。 (注:原文中“angiotensin receptor blockers”表述有误,应该是“implantable cardioverter defibrillators”,译文已按照正确内容翻译)
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 31;6(2):e1056. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1056. eCollection 2023 Feb.