Lin Jou-Wei, Chang Chia-Hsuin, Caffrey James L, Wu Li-Chiu, Lai Mei-Shu
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Rd, Section 1, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):968-76. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02550. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
Concerns about an increased cardiovascular risk with the angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan, prompted the current study to examine associations between olmesartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers with overall and cause-specific mortalities. We collected patients who started to use losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, candesartan, telmisartan, and olmesartan between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2009, from Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database. Prescribed drug types, dosage, and other clinical information were collected. Overall mortality and cause-specific mortality were ascertained through linkages with Taiwan's National Death Registry. Two follow-up analyses, labeled intention-to-treat and as-treated, were conducted. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using losartan as the reference group. A total of 690 463 subjects were included, with a mean follow-up ranging from a low of 2.8 years for olmesartan to a high of 4.1 years for irbesartan. Subjects who began with valsartan had a modest but significantly increased risk of overall mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) compared with losartan. Irbesartan (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), candesartan (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99), telmisartan (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96), and olmesartan (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97) were associated with a slightly lower overall mortality risk than losartan. The analysis indicates that the differences in mortality risk among individual angiotensin receptor blockers were only marginal and thus less likely to be clinically important. Although uncontrolled confounding might still exist, olmesartan does not seem to increase cardiovascular risk compared with losartan.
对血管紧张素受体阻滞剂奥美沙坦心血管风险增加的担忧促使本研究调查奥美沙坦及其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率之间的关联。我们从台湾国民健康保险理赔数据库中收集了2004年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间开始使用氯沙坦、缬沙坦、厄贝沙坦、坎地沙坦、替米沙坦和奥美沙坦的患者。收集了处方药类型、剂量及其他临床信息。通过与台湾国民死亡登记处的关联确定全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率。进行了两项随访分析,分别标记为意向性治疗分析和实际治疗分析。使用Cox比例风险回归模型,以氯沙坦作为参照组计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。总共纳入了690463名受试者,平均随访时间从奥美沙坦的2.8年到厄贝沙坦的4.1年不等。与氯沙坦相比,起始使用缬沙坦的受试者全因死亡率风险有适度但显著的增加(HR,1.04;95%CI,1.02 - 1.06)。厄贝沙坦(HR,0.96;95%CI,0.94 - 0.99)、坎地沙坦(HR,0.95;95%CI,0.92 - 0.99)、替米沙坦(HR,0.93;95%CI,0.90 - 0.96)和奥美沙坦(HR,0.93;95%CI,0.88 - 0.97)与比氯沙坦略低的全因死亡率风险相关。分析表明,各血管紧张素受体阻滞剂之间的死亡率风险差异仅为边际差异,因此在临床上不太可能具有重要意义。尽管可能仍然存在未控制的混杂因素,但与氯沙坦相比,奥美沙坦似乎不会增加心血管风险。