• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从奥美沙坦转换为其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂后维持目标血压。

Maintaining goal blood pressures after switching from olmesartan to other angiotensin receptor blockers.

作者信息

Saseen Joseph J, Ghushchyan Vahram, Kaila Shuchita, Allen Richard R, Nair Kavita V

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO; Department of Family Medicine , School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Dec;15(12):888-92. doi: 10.1111/jch.12197. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1111/jch.12197
PMID:24102728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8033908/
Abstract

This study assessed blood pressure (BP) goal maintenance in patients controlled with olmesartan monotherapy after switching to another angiotensin type II receptor blocker (ARB). Hypertensive patients prescribed olmesartan monotherapy were identified from GE Healthcare's Centricity electronic medical record between 2007 and 2011. After documentation of BP goal (<140/90 mm Hg) attainment, patients were placed into the continuation cohort if olmesartan monotherapy was maintained or into the switch cohort if they were changed to irbesartan, losartan, or valsartan. Follow-up assessments were the first BP measurement 28 to 390 days after attaining BP goal (continuation cohort) or after prescribing an alternative ARB (switch cohort). Of 3412 patients included (3027 continuation cohort, 385 switch cohort), 52% were women and mean age was 58.0 years. In the switch cohort, 310 (80.5%) were switched to losartan (n=236), irbesartan (n=58), or valsartan (n=16) monotherapy and 75 (19.5%) were switched to combination antihypertensive therapy. Mean baseline and follow-up BP were 122.5/75.8 mm Hg and 126.6/77.6 mm Hg, respectively, in the continuation cohort (P<.001) and 123.5/75.4 mm Hg and 129.6/78.5 mm Hg, respectively, in the switch cohort (P<.001). BP goal maintenance was 78.7% and 72.2% in the continuation and switch cohort, respectively (odds ratio, 0.707; 95% confidence interval, 0.555-0.899). Patients who continued on olmesartan monotherapy after attaining BP goal had a higher percentage of BP goal maintenance than patients who switched therapy.

摘要

本研究评估了接受奥美沙坦单药治疗且血压得到控制的患者换用另一种血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)后血压目标的维持情况。2007年至2011年期间,从通用电气医疗集团的Centricity电子病历中识别出接受奥美沙坦单药治疗的高血压患者。在记录到血压目标(<140/90 mmHg)达成后,如果继续使用奥美沙坦单药治疗,患者被纳入继续治疗队列;如果换用厄贝沙坦、氯沙坦或缬沙坦,则被纳入换药队列。随访评估是在达到血压目标后28至390天(继续治疗队列)或开具替代ARB药物后(换药队列)进行的首次血压测量。纳入的3412例患者中(继续治疗队列3027例,换药队列385例),52%为女性,平均年龄为58.0岁。在换药队列中,310例(80.5%)换用氯沙坦(n = 236)、厄贝沙坦(n = 58)或缬沙坦(n = 16)单药治疗,75例(19.5%)换用联合降压治疗。继续治疗队列的平均基线血压和随访血压分别为122.5/75.8 mmHg和126.6/77.6 mmHg(P <.001),换药队列分别为123.5/75.4 mmHg和129.6/78.5 mmHg(P <.001)。继续治疗队列和换药队列的血压目标维持率分别为78.7%和72.2%(优势比,0.707;95%置信区间,0.555 - 0.899)。达到血压目标后继续使用奥美沙坦单药治疗的患者血压目标维持率高于换药治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
Maintaining goal blood pressures after switching from olmesartan to other angiotensin receptor blockers.从奥美沙坦转换为其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂后维持目标血压。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Dec;15(12):888-92. doi: 10.1111/jch.12197. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
2
Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.使用24小时动态血压监测评估降压疗效:奥美沙坦酯、氯沙坦钾、缬沙坦和厄贝沙坦的比较
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(1):41-50. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505010-00006.
3
Blood pressure outcomes in patients receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers in primary care: a comparative effectiveness analysis from electronic medical record data.在基层医疗中使用血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂的患者的血压结果:来自电子病历数据的比较效果分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Nov;13(11):801-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00539.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
4
Olmesartan compared with other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: head-to-head trials.与其他血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂相比的奥美沙坦:头对头试验。
Clin Ther. 2004;26 Suppl A:A33-7. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90144-0.
5
Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension.奥美沙坦、氯沙坦、缬沙坦和厄贝沙坦在控制原发性高血压方面的疗效比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2001 Sep-Oct;3(5):283-91, 318. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.01136.x.
6
Comparison of increasing doses of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, and valsartan in patients with essential hypertension.奥美沙坦酯、氯沙坦钾和缬沙坦递增剂量用于原发性高血压患者的比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Mar;9(3):187-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06395.x.
7
Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.在 1 期和 2 期高血压患者中,血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与奥美沙坦和缬沙坦对动态血压和诊室血压的影响。
Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
8
Examining the association of olmesartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers with overall and cause-specific mortality.研究奥美沙坦及其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率之间的关联。
Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):968-76. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02550. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study.血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂对2型糖尿病高血压患者血清尿酸的比较影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Nov 4;12:159. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-159.
10
A home blood pressure monitoring study comparing the antihypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonist fixed combinations.一项比较两种血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂固定复方制剂降压疗效的家庭血压监测研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2005 Nov;18(11):1482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Representativeness of US Centricity Electronic Medical Records With Reports From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Comparative Study on Office Visits and Cardiometabolic Conditions.通过疾病控制与预防中心的报告评估以美国为中心的电子病历的代表性:门诊就诊和心血管代谢疾病的比较研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 3;8(6):e17174. doi: 10.2196/17174.
2
The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review.门诊患者非医疗换药的影响:一项更新的系统文献综述
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Oct 19;7(1):1678563. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2013年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
2
Trends in antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control among United States adults with hypertension: the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001 to 2010.美国高血压成年人降压药物使用和血压控制趋势:2001 至 2010 年国家健康和营养调查。
Circulation. 2012 Oct 23;126(17):2105-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.096156.
3
Angiotensin receptor blockers: pharmacology, efficacy, and safety.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂:药理学、疗效和安全性。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Sep;13(9):677-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00518.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
4
Vital signs: prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension--United States, 1999-2002 and 2005-2008.生命体征:1999-2002 年和 2005-2008 年美国高血压的流行率、治疗和控制情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Feb 4;60(4):103-8.
5
A randomized, double-blind, forced-titration study to compare olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension.一项比较奥美沙坦酯与氯沙坦钾在 1 期和 2 期高血压患者中疗效的随机、双盲、滴定强制研究。
Postgrad Med. 2011 Jan;123(1):80-7. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.01.2248.
6
Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.预测美国心血管疾病的未来:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circulation. 2011 Mar 1;123(8):933-44. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
7
Deaths preventable in the U.S. by improvements in use of clinical preventive services.美国可以通过改善临床预防服务的使用来预防死亡。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):600-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.016.
8
LDL-C goal attainment in patients who remain on atorvastatin or switch to equivalent or non-equivalent doses of simvastatin: a retrospective matched cohort study in clinical practice.在继续使用阿托伐他汀或转换为等效或非等效剂量辛伐他汀的患者中 LDL-C 目标的达成:临床实践中的回顾性匹配队列研究。
Postgrad Med. 2010 Mar;122(2):16-24. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.03.2118.
9
Economic impact of switching from valsartan to other angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertension.从缬沙坦转为其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗高血压患者的经济影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):849-60. doi: 10.1185/03007991003613910.
10
Association of hypertension treatment and control with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among US adults with hypertension.美国高血压患者的高血压治疗和控制与全因和心血管疾病死亡率的关系。
Am J Hypertens. 2010 Jan;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.191. Epub 2009 Oct 22.