Suppr超能文献

股骨髋臼撞击症手术中髋臼盂唇撕裂的外科治疗:一项系统评价

Surgical management of labral tears during femoroacetabular impingement surgery: a systematic review.

作者信息

Ayeni O R, Adamich J, Farrokhyar F, Simunovic N, Crouch S, Philippon M J, Bhandari M

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada,

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):756-62. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2886-8. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review explored reported outcomes addressing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), specifically those comparing labral debridement to labral repair. In addition, the quality of the evidence was evaluated for the purposes of making treatment recommendations.

METHODS

Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) were searched for comparative studies involving labral repair and debridement during FAI surgery. Two reviewers conducted a title, abstract, and full-text review of eligible studies and the references of these studies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the searched studies, data were extracted, and a quality assessment was completed for included studies.

RESULTS

Six eligible studies involving 490 patients were identified. The most commonly reported outcome measure was the modified Harris hip score (MHHS) (50 %). All studies reported that labral repair had greater postoperative improvements in functional scores (modified Harris hip, non-arthritic hip, hip outcome, and Merle d'Aubigne scores) compared to labral debridement. Five studies reported statistically significant improvements with labral repair. MHHS were pooled to demonstrate a clinically important difference in favor of labral repair by 7.4 points in three studies. The mean individual study quality can be considered fair. However, the overall quality of the body of evidence in this review is rated as low according to GRADE guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates a reporting of better clinical outcomes with labral repair compared to labral debridement in all studies with five of six studies reporting statistically significant improvements (of repair over debridement). However, given the lack of high quality evidence and associated limitations in study design, these results should be interpreted with caution. Consequently, definitive treatment recommendations require further investigation with well-conducted clinical trials. This systematic review enables the discussion of best evidence practice for the surgical managing of a labral tear associated with FAI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

本系统评价探讨了有关股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)的报告结局,特别是那些比较盂唇清创术与盂唇修复术的结局。此外,为了提出治疗建议,对证据质量进行了评估。

方法

检索了三个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE和PubMed),以查找涉及FAI手术中盂唇修复和清创的比较研究。两名审阅者对符合条件的研究及其参考文献进行了标题、摘要和全文审查。将纳入和排除标准应用于检索到的研究,提取数据,并对纳入研究完成质量评估。

结果

确定了六项符合条件的研究,涉及490名患者。最常报告的结局指标是改良Harris髋关节评分(MHHS)(50%)。所有研究均报告,与盂唇清创术相比,盂唇修复术后功能评分(改良Harris髋关节、非关节炎髋关节、髋关节结局和Merle d'Aubigne评分)有更大改善。五项研究报告盂唇修复有统计学上的显著改善。汇总三项研究的MHHS以证明盂唇修复在临床上有重要差异,优势为7.4分。各研究的平均质量可认为一般。然而,根据GRADE指南,本评价中证据总体质量被评为低。

结论

本评价表明,在所有研究中,与盂唇清创术相比,盂唇修复术报告的临床结局更好,六项研究中有五项报告有统计学上的显著改善(修复优于清创)。然而,鉴于缺乏高质量证据以及研究设计存在相关局限性,这些结果应谨慎解读。因此,明确的治疗建议需要通过精心开展的临床试验进一步研究。本系统评价有助于讨论与FAI相关的盂唇撕裂手术管理的最佳证据实践。

证据级别

III级

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验