• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

努力-回报失衡量表在青年芬兰人研究中的纵向测量不变性。

Longitudinal measurement invariance of the effort-reward imbalance scales in the Young Finns study.

机构信息

Unit of Personality, Work and Health Psychology, IBS, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):289-94. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101947. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1136/oemed-2013-101947
PMID:24520148
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In order to make valid conclusions about individual change in work-related risk factors it is important to examine whether these factors are measurement invariant over time. We tested the measurement invariance of the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) scales using the ERI Questionnaire (ERI-Q). Additionally, we examined the criterion validity of the ERI scales.

METHODS

The sample used in this study was population-based and comprised 2128 participants (56.6% women) in full-time employment. Data on effort, reward and self-reported general stress were collected in 2007 and 2012. Measurement invariance was assessed separately for the effort and reward scales, with reward treated as a first-order and as a second-order variable. Criterion validity of the ERI scales was also examined using a single-item measure of general stress.

RESULTS

Effort and reward were found to be measurement invariant over time, that is, they measured the same latent variable across both time points. Furthermore, ERI and its components showed adequate criterion validity, and effort was additionally found to prospectively predict general stress 5 years later (β=0.072, 95% CI 0.013 to 0.131).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that changes in the scores of the ERI scales are more likely caused by changes in perceptions of work characteristics than by changes in the construct of the scales. Additionally, the results support the criterion validity of ERI and its components.

摘要

目的

为了对工作相关风险因素的个体变化做出有效的结论,重要的是要检验这些因素是否随着时间的推移具有测量不变性。我们使用努力-回报失衡(ERI)问卷(ERI-Q)检验了 ERI 量表的测量不变性。此外,我们还检验了 ERI 量表的效标效度。

方法

本研究的样本是基于人群的,包括 2128 名全职就业者(56.6%为女性)。2007 年和 2012 年分别收集了努力、回报和自我报告的一般压力数据。努力和回报量表的测量不变性分别进行评估,回报被视为一阶和二阶变量。ERI 量表的效标效度也使用一般压力的单一项目测量进行了检验。

结果

努力和回报在时间上被发现具有测量不变性,也就是说,它们在两个时间点上测量了相同的潜在变量。此外,ERI 及其组成部分表现出足够的效标效度,努力还被发现可以预测 5 年后的一般压力(β=0.072,95%CI 0.013 至 0.131)。

结论

我们的结果表明,ERI 量表得分的变化更可能是由对工作特征的感知变化引起的,而不是由量表结构的变化引起的。此外,结果支持 ERI 及其组成部分的效标效度。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal measurement invariance of the effort-reward imbalance scales in the Young Finns study.努力-回报失衡量表在青年芬兰人研究中的纵向测量不变性。
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):289-94. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101947. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
2
Effort-reward imbalance at work and psychological distress: a validation study of post-myocardial infarction patients.工作中的努力-回报失衡与心理困扰:心肌梗死后患者的验证性研究。
Psychosom Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;73(6):448-55. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000399790.82499.d7. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
3
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
How valid is a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work? A replication study from Sweden.工作中努力-回报失衡的短度量表有多有效?来自瑞典的一项复制研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Aug;67(8):526-31. doi: 10.1136/oem.2009.050930. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
5
[Comment on "the reliability and validity of the effort-reward imbalance - the Chinese version"].[对“努力-回报失衡中文版的信效度”的评论]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;27(1):25-8.
6
[Work stress, health and satisfaction of life in young doctors. Results of a longitudinal study in Switzerland].[工作压力、健康状况与年轻医生的生活满意度。瑞士一项纵向研究的结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Nov;133(47):2441-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100936. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
7
Reciprocal relations between effort-reward imbalance at work and adverse health: a three-wave panel survey.工作中努力-回报失衡与不良健康状况之间的相互关系:一项三波面板调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jan;68(1):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.055. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
8
Factorial invariance and stability of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Scales: a longitudinal analysis of two samples with different time lags.努力-回报失衡量表的因子不变性和稳定性:对两个具有不同时间间隔样本的纵向分析
Int J Behav Med. 2008 Jan-Mar;15(1):62-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03003075.
9
Validating the short measure of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire in older workers in the context of New Zealand.在新西兰背景下验证老年工人努力-回报失衡问卷的简短量表。
J Occup Health. 2017 Nov 25;59(6):495-505. doi: 10.1539/joh.17-0044-OA. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Effort-reward imbalance at work and recurrent coronary heart disease events: a 4-year prospective study of post-myocardial infarction patients.工作中的努力-回报失衡与复发性冠心病事件:心肌梗死后患者的 4 年前瞻性研究。
Psychosom Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;73(6):436-47. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318222b2d8. Epub 2011 Jun 24.