• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠外科手术中的决策。

Decision-making in rectal surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;16(3):203-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12487.

DOI:10.1111/codi.12487
PMID:24521275
Abstract

AIM

The decision to create a stoma after anterior resection has significant consequences. Decisions under uncertainty are made with a variety of cognitive tools, or heuristics. Past experience has been shown to be a powerful heuristic in other domains. Our aim was to identify whether the misfortune of recent anastomotic leakage or surgeon propensity to take everyday risks would affect their decision to defunction a range of anastomoses.

METHOD

Questionnaires were sent to members of the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand. Participants were asked for demographic information, questions regarding risk-taking propensity, when their last anastomotic leakage occurred and whether they would defunction a range of hypothetical rectal anastomoses grouped according to height, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and use of preoperative radiotherapy. Scores were derived for hypothetical patient likelihood of having a stoma created and individual surgeon propensity for stoma formation. Hazard regression analysis was used to assess demographic predictors of stoma formation.

RESULTS

In total, 110 (75.3%) of 146 surveyed surgeons replied; 72 (65.5%) reported anastomotic leakage within the last 12 months. Surgeons' propensity for risk-taking was comparable (24.6 vs 27.53, 95% confidence interval, Mann-Whitney-U) to previously studied participants in economic models. Surgeon age (< 50 years) and lower propensity for risk-taking were demonstrated to be independent predictors of stoma formation on regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although the decision to create a stoma after anterior resection may be made in the belief that its foundation derives from rational thought, it appears that other unrecognized operator factors such as age and risk-taking exert an effect.

摘要

目的

前切除术(anterior resection)后造口的决定具有重要意义。在不确定的情况下,人们会使用各种认知工具或启发式方法做出决策。过去的经验已被证明是其他领域的有力启发式方法。我们的目的是确定近期吻合口漏(anastomotic leakage)的不幸事件或外科医生承担日常风险的倾向是否会影响他们对一系列吻合口进行功能障碍(defunction)的决定。

方法

向澳大利亚和新西兰结直肠外科学会(Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand)的成员发送了问卷。参与者被要求提供人口统计学信息、风险承担倾向问题、他们最近一次吻合口漏发生的时间以及他们是否会对一系列假设的直肠吻合口进行功能障碍,这些吻合口根据高度、美国麻醉师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists)分级和术前放疗的使用情况进行分组。为假设患者需要造口的可能性和每位外科医生形成造口的倾向创建了评分。风险回归分析用于评估人口统计学因素对造口形成的预测。

结果

共调查了 146 名外科医生中的 110 名(75.3%);72 名(65.5%)报告在过去 12 个月内发生吻合口漏。外科医生的风险承担倾向与经济模型中先前研究的参与者相当(24.6 比 27.53,95%置信区间,Mann-Whitney-U)。回归分析显示,外科医生年龄(<50 岁)和较低的风险承担倾向是造口形成的独立预测因素。

结论

尽管前切除术(anterior resection)后造口的决定可能是基于理性思维做出的,但似乎还有其他未被认识到的操作者因素,如年龄和风险承担倾向,会产生影响。

相似文献

1
Decision-making in rectal surgery.直肠外科手术中的决策。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;16(3):203-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12487.
2
Heuristics and bias in rectal surgery.直肠手术中的启发法与偏差
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1109-1115. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2823-7. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection.腹腔镜直肠癌手术中的转流性回肠造口术:高昂的保护代价。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4809-4816. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4811-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
4
Reply to Lutrin: decision-making in colorectal surgery.对卢特林的回应:结直肠手术中的决策制定
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;16(10):831. doi: 10.1111/codi.12721.
5
Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study.功能性回肠造口术联合低位前切除术治疗低位直肠癌:我们应该将回肠造口术作为常规手术吗?一项前瞻性随机研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Sep-Oct;55(86-87):1562-7.
6
Response to MacDermid et al.对麦克德米德等人的回应
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;16(10):831. doi: 10.1111/codi.12724.
7
Transumbilical defunctioning ileostomy: A new approach for patients at risks of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection.经脐预防性回肠造口术:腹腔镜低位前切除术吻合口漏风险患者的新方法。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Nov;33(11):5011-5.
8
Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.直肠癌低位前切除术后回肠转流造口术与非转流造口术的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1129-39. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy effects on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching analysis.术前放化疗对直肠癌切除术后吻合口漏的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):516-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829068c5.
10
The risk of definitive stoma formation at 10 years after low and ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer.直肠癌低位和超低位前切除术后10年确定性造口形成的风险。
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):59-66. doi: 10.1111/codi.13124.

引用本文的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy vs Up-Front Surgery for Resectable Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.新辅助放疗与 upfront 手术治疗可切除的局部晚期直肠癌的比较。 注:这里“upfront”可能是“up-front”的错误拼写,更准确的意思是“直接的、先于其他的”等意思,结合语境这里可理解为“先进行手术” 。完整准确译文:新辅助放疗与先行手术治疗可切除的局部晚期直肠癌的比较 。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259049. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9049.
2
Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum (PICARR): a decision-making exploring international survey.直肠前切除术后保护性回肠造口术(PICARR):一项探索性国际决策调查。
Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02111-6.
3
Exploring variation in surgical practice: does surgeon personality influence anastomotic decision-making?
探讨手术实践中的变异性:外科医生的个性是否影响吻合决策?
Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1156-1163. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac200.
4
Risk taking propensity: Nurse, surgeon and patient preferences for diverting ileostomy.冒险倾向:护士、外科医生及患者对回肠造口改道的偏好
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Sep;24(9):1073-1079. doi: 10.1111/codi.16149. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
A Systematic Review of the Abdominal Surgeon's Personality: Exploring Common Traits in Western Populations.腹部外科医生人格的系统评价:探索西方人群的共同特征
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Dec 26;11(1):2. doi: 10.3390/bs11010002.
6
The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰结直肠手术调查的益处
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Apr;36(2):102-111. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.09.17. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
Development of a Risk Score to Predict Anastomotic Leak After Left-Sided Colectomy: Which Patients Warrant Diversion?左半结肠癌术后吻合口漏风险评分模型的建立:哪些患者需要转流?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):132-143. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04293-y. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
8
Defunctioning Stomas Result in Significantly More Short-Term Complications Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌低位前切除术后,去功能化造口导致的短期并发症显著更多。
World J Surg. 2018 Nov;42(11):3755-3764. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4672-0.
9
Heuristics and bias in rectal surgery.直肠手术中的启发法与偏差
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1109-1115. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2823-7. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
10
Patients who failed endoscopic stenting for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction suffered the worst outcomes.因左侧恶性大肠梗阻接受内镜支架置入术失败的患者,预后最差。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;29(10):1267-73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1948-1. Epub 2014 Jul 2.