Omer Shuab, Cornwell Lorraine D, Rosengart Todd K, Kelly Rosemary F, Ward Herbert B, Holman William L, Bakaeen Faisal G
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; The Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Tex.
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; The Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Tex.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1307-1315.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.039. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
We conducted a multicenter observational cohort study of the effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. We also investigated the impact of age and off-pump surgery.
The Veterans Affairs Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program was used to identify all patients (N=41,139) with left main and 3-vessel coronary artery disease who underwent nonemergency coronary artery bypass grafting from October 1997 to April 2011. The primary outcome measure, all-cause mortality, was compared between patients with complete revascularization and patients with incomplete revascularization. Survival functions were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. Propensity scores calculated for each patient were used to match 5509 patients undergoing complete revascularization to 5509 patients undergoing incomplete revascularization. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients aged at least 70 years and patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
In the unmatched groups, several risk factors were more common in the incomplete revascularization group, as was off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. In the matched groups, risk-adjusted mortality was higher in the incomplete revascularization group than in the complete revascularization group at 1 year (6.96% vs 5.97%; risk ratio [RR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.34), 5 years (18.50% vs 15.96%; RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.26), and 10 years (32.12% vs 27.40%; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.24), with an overall hazard ratio of 1.18 (95% CI, 1.09-1.28; P<.0001). The hazard ratio for patients aged 70 years or more was 1.125 (95% CI, 1.001-1.263; P=.048). The hazard ratio was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.303-1.655) for the unmatched off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group and 1.156 (95% CI, 1.000-1.335) for the matched off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group.
Incomplete revascularization is associated with decreased long-term survival, even in elderly patients. Surgeons should consider these findings when choosing a revascularization strategy, particularly if off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is contemplated.
我们开展了一项多中心观察性队列研究,以探讨冠状动脉搭桥术后血管重建完整性对长期生存的影响。我们还研究了年龄和非体外循环手术的影响。
利用退伍军人事务部心脏手术持续改进项目,确定了1997年10月至2011年4月期间接受非急诊冠状动脉搭桥术的所有左主干和三支血管冠状动脉疾病患者(N = 41139)。比较完全血管重建患者和不完全血管重建患者的主要结局指标全因死亡率。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存函数,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。为每位患者计算的倾向得分用于将5509例接受完全血管重建的患者与5509例接受不完全血管重建的患者进行匹配。对年龄至少70岁的患者和接受非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者进行了亚组分析。
在未匹配组中,不完全血管重建组的几个危险因素更为常见,非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术也是如此。在匹配组中,不完全血管重建组的风险调整死亡率在1年时高于完全血管重建组(6.96%对5.97%;风险比[RR],1.17;95%置信区间[CI],1.01 - 1.34),5年时(18.50%对15.96%;RR,1.16;95% CI,1.07 - 1.26),10年时(32.12%对27.40%;RR,1.17;95% CI,1.11 - 1.24),总体风险比为1.18(95% CI,1.09 - 1.28;P <.0001)。70岁及以上患者的风险比为1.125(95% CI,1.001 - 1.263;P = 0.048)。未匹配的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术组的风险比为1.47(95% CI,1.303 - 1.655),匹配的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术组的风险比为1.156(95% CI,1.000 - 1.335)。
即使在老年患者中,不完全血管重建也与长期生存率降低相关。外科医生在选择血管重建策略时应考虑这些发现,特别是在考虑非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术时。