Suppr超能文献

对于适合腹膜透析和血液透析的患者,治疗方式的选择对住院率的影响。

Impact of modality choice on rates of hospitalization in patients eligible for both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

作者信息

Quinn Robert R, Ravani Pietro, Zhang Xin, Garg Amit X, Blake Peter G, Austin Peter C, Zacharias James M, Johnson John F, Pandeya Sanjay, Verrelli Mauro, Oliver Matthew J

机构信息

Faculties of Medicine and Community Health Sciences1 and of Medicine,2 University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta;

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):41-8. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00257.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization rates are a relevant consideration when choosing or recommending a dialysis modality. Previous comparisons of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) have not been restricted to individuals who were eligible for both therapies. ♢

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of people 18 years of age and older who were eligible for both PD and HD, and who started outpatient dialysis between 2007 and 2010 in four Canadian dialysis programs. Zero-inflated negative binomial models, adjusted for baseline patient characteristics, were used to examine the association between modality choice and rates of hospitalization. ♢

RESULTS

The study enrolled 314 patients. A trend in the HD group toward higher rates of hospitalization, observed in the primary analysis, became significant when modality was treated as a time-varying exposure or when the population was restricted to elective outpatient starts in patients with at least 4 months of pre-dialysis care. Cardiovascular disease, infectious complications, and elective surgery were the most common reasons for hospital admission; only 23% of hospital stays were directly related to complications of dialysis or kidney disease. ♢

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to promote PD utilization are unlikely to result in increased rates of hospitalization, and efforts to reduce hospital admissions should focus on potentially avoidable causes of cardiovascular disease and infectious complications.

摘要

背景

在选择或推荐透析方式时,住院率是一个相关的考量因素。以往对腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)的比较并未局限于适合两种治疗方法的个体。♢

方法

我们对18岁及以上、适合PD和HD两种治疗方法且于2007年至2010年期间在加拿大四个透析项目中开始门诊透析的人群进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。使用针对基线患者特征进行调整的零膨胀负二项式模型来检验透析方式选择与住院率之间的关联。♢

结果

该研究纳入了314名患者。在初步分析中观察到HD组住院率有上升趋势,当将透析方式视为随时间变化的暴露因素时,或者当人群仅限于有至少4个月透析前护理的择期门诊起始患者时,这种趋势变得显著。心血管疾病、感染并发症和择期手术是住院的最常见原因;只有23%的住院与透析或肾脏疾病的并发症直接相关。♢

结论

促进PD使用的努力不太可能导致住院率上升,而降低住院率的努力应集中在心血管疾病和感染并发症的潜在可避免原因上。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.腹膜透析与血液透析治疗开始透析的患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD013800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.
9
Analysis of outcome and factors correlated with maintenance peritoneal dialysis.维持性腹膜透析的结局及相关因素分析
J Int Med Res. 2019 Oct;47(10):4683-4690. doi: 10.1177/0300060519862091. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
Hospitalizations in Dialysis Patients in Canada: A National Cohort Study.加拿大透析患者的住院情况:一项全国队列研究。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Jun 1;5:2054358118780372. doi: 10.1177/2054358118780372. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验