• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5 年内再次血运重建对经皮或手术血运重建后 10 年死亡率的影响。

Impact of repeat revascularization within 5 years on 10-year mortality after percutaneous or surgical revascularization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Cardiology, CORRIB Research Center for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1302-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02211-6. Epub 2023 May 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-023-02211-6
PMID:37150783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10449944/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SYNTAX trial demonstrated negative impact of repeat revascularization (RR) on 5-year outcomes following PCI/CABG in patients with three-vessel(3VD) and/or left main coronary artery disease(LMCAD). We aimed to investigate the impact of RR within 5 years, on 10-year mortality in patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD after PCI/CABG.

METHODS

The SYNTAXES study evaluated the vital status out to 10 years of patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD. Patients were stratified by RR within 5 years and randomized treatment. The association between RR within 5 years and 10-year mortality was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 330 out of 1800 patients (18.3%) underwent RR within 5 years. RR occurred more frequently after initial PCI than after initial CABG (25.9% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Overall, 10-year mortality was comparable between patients undergoing RR and those not (28.2% vs. 26.1%, adjusted HR: 1.17, 95%CI 0.93-1.48, p = 0.187). In the PCI arm, RR was associated with a trend toward higher 10-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.29, 95%CI 0.97-1.72, p = 0.075), while in the CABG arm, the trend was opposite (adjusted HR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.46-1.20, p = 0.219). Among patients requiring RR, those who underwent PCI as initial revascularization had a higher risk of 10-year mortality compared to initial CABG (33.5% vs. 17.6%, adjusted HR: 2.09, 95%CI 1.21-3.61, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In the SYNTAXES study, RR within 5 years had no impact on 10-year all-cause death in the population overall. Among patients requiring any repeat procedures, 10-year mortality was higher after initial treatment with PCI than after CABG. These exploratory findings should be investigated with larger populations in future studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ; SYNTAXES Unique identifier: NCT03417050. URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ; SYNTAX Unique identifier: NCT00114972.

摘要

背景

SYNTAX 试验表明,在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)/冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗的三血管病变(3VD)和/或左主干冠状动脉疾病(LMCAD)患者中,重复血运重建(RR)对 5 年后的结局有负面影响。我们旨在研究 RR 在 5 年内对接受 PCI/CABG 治疗的 3VD 和/或 LMCAD 患者 10 年后死亡率的影响。

方法

SYNTAXES 研究评估了 3VD 和/或 LMCAD 患者 10 年的生存状况。根据 RR 在 5 年内的分层情况,将患者随机分为治疗组。评估 RR 在 5 年内与 10 年死亡率之间的关系。

结果

在 1800 例患者中,共有 330 例(18.3%)在 5 年内接受了 RR。初始 PCI 后 RR 发生的频率高于初始 CABG(25.9% vs. 13.7%,p<0.001)。总的来说,RR 组和非 RR 组的 10 年死亡率相当(28.2% vs. 26.1%,调整后的 HR:1.17,95%CI 0.93-1.48,p=0.187)。在 PCI 组中,RR 与 10 年死亡率呈上升趋势(调整后的 HR:1.29,95%CI 0.97-1.72,p=0.075),而在 CABG 组中,这一趋势相反(调整后的 HR:0.74,95%CI 0.46-1.20,p=0.219)。在需要 RR 的患者中,与初始 CABG 相比,初始 PCI 作为再血管化治疗的患者 10 年死亡率更高(33.5% vs. 17.6%,调整后的 HR:2.09,95%CI 1.21-3.61,p=0.008)。

结论

在 SYNTAXES 研究中,RR 在 5 年内对总体人群的 10 年全因死亡没有影响。在需要重复治疗的患者中,与初始 CABG 相比,初始 PCI 后 10 年死亡率更高。这些探索性发现应在未来的研究中用更大的人群进行研究。

试验注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;SYNTAXES 唯一标识符:NCT03417050。网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;SYNTAX 唯一标识符:NCT00114972。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/566dc0713aff/392_2023_2211_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/ad9bbd4d3f7f/392_2023_2211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/e919b374fc09/392_2023_2211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/0bd109a5b1c1/392_2023_2211_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/7e5b2ba2fdcb/392_2023_2211_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/566dc0713aff/392_2023_2211_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/ad9bbd4d3f7f/392_2023_2211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/e919b374fc09/392_2023_2211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/0bd109a5b1c1/392_2023_2211_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/7e5b2ba2fdcb/392_2023_2211_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f8/10449944/566dc0713aff/392_2023_2211_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of repeat revascularization within 5 years on 10-year mortality after percutaneous or surgical revascularization.5 年内再次血运重建对经皮或手术血运重建后 10 年死亡率的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1302-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02211-6. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.单支或多支动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在三支血管病变或左主干病变患者中的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 31;43(13):1334-1344. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab537.
3
Ten-Year All-Cause Death According to Completeness of Revascularization in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study.三血管病变或左主干病变患者完全血运重建后十年全因死亡情况:来自 SYNTAX 扩展生存研究的结果。
Circulation. 2021 Jul 13;144(2):96-109. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046289. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Ten-year all-cause death after percutaneous or surgical revascularization in diabetic patients with complex coronary artery disease.糖尿病合并复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经皮或手术血运重建后 10 年全因死亡。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 28;43(1):56-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab441.
5
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
Effect of Patient-Reported Preprocedural Physical and Mental Health on 10-Year Mortality After Percutaneous or Surgical Coronary Revascularization.经皮冠状动脉或手术血运重建术后 10 年死亡率与患者术前身心状况的关系。
Circulation. 2022 Oct 25;146(17):1268-1280. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057021. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
7
Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on 10-year mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass surgery for complex coronary artery disease: insights from the SYNTAX Extended Survival study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病对复杂冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和旁路手术后 10 年死亡率的影响:来自 SYNTAX 扩展生存研究的见解。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Jul;110(7):1083-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01833-y. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
8
10-Year All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Heavy Calcification.重度钙化患者行经皮或手术血运重建后 10 年全因死亡率。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 24;15(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
9
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
10
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗缺血性心脏病的疗效比较:近期随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiol Res. 2024 Jun;15(3):153-168. doi: 10.14740/cr1638. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Ten-year all-cause death after percutaneous or surgical revascularization in diabetic patients with complex coronary artery disease.糖尿病合并复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经皮或手术血运重建后 10 年全因死亡。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 28;43(1):56-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab441.
3
Ten-Year All-Cause Death According to Completeness of Revascularization in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study.
三血管病变或左主干病变患者完全血运重建后十年全因死亡情况:来自 SYNTAX 扩展生存研究的结果。
Circulation. 2021 Jul 13;144(2):96-109. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046289. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Long-Term Prognostic Impact of Restenosis of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Requiring Repeat Revascularization.需要再次血运重建的无保护左主干冠状动脉再狭窄的长期预后影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 12;13(19):2266-2274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.07.017.
5
Mortality After Repeat Revascularization Following PCI or CABG for Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.左主干病变经 PCI 或 CABG 重复血运重建后的死亡率:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 10;13(3):375-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.019. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
6
Limitations of Repeat Revascularization as an Outcome Measure: JACC Review Topic of the Week.重复血运重建作为结局指标的局限性:JACC 本周综述主题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 24;74(25):3164-3173. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.041.
7
Outcomes of Second Arterial Conduits in Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.多支冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的第二动脉移植物的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Nov 5;74(18):2238-2248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1043.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Repeat Coronary Bypass Surgery or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Previous Surgical Revascularization.再次行冠状动脉旁路移植术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗于先前的外科血运重建术后。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep;94(9):1743-1752. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.048.
10
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.