KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Centre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, Tiensestraat 102, Bus 3712, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Thomas More University College Antwerp, Jozef De Bomstraat 11, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium.
KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Centre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, Tiensestraat 102, Bus 3712, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Thomas More University College Antwerp, Jozef De Bomstraat 11, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium.
Appetite. 2014 May;76:137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.078. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
We examined the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Attitudes to Chocolate Questionnaire (ACQ), comparing the original three-factor model to a later-suggested two-factor model. We evaluated the construct validity of the ACQ by investigating the associations between the resulting factors and other eating-related questionnaires such as the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire and the Food Thought Suppression Inventory. Finally, we compared the scores on several scales regarding eating behavior between different groups (men versus women, dieters versus non-dieters and cravers versus non-cravers). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch ACQ indicated the best global fit indices for the two-factor model, with the resulting factors being "Negative consequences and Guilt" and "Craving and emotional eating". Both factors were associated with other eating-related dimensions. However, craving seemed to be uniquely associated with the amount of chocolate consumed per week, whereas guilt correlated strongly with restraint. Finally, women scored higher on nearly all scales, but there was no significant gender difference with regard to chocolate consumption. Dieters reported more disinhibition, restraint, food-thought suppression and guilt, but they did not significantly differ from non-dieters with regards to their levels of craving, hunger nor consumption.
我们检验了荷兰版巧克力态度问卷(ACQ)的心理计量学特性,将原有的三因素模型与后来提出的两因素模型进行了比较。我们通过研究各因素与其他与饮食相关的问卷(如三因素饮食问卷和食物思维抑制量表)之间的关联,来评估 ACQ 的结构效度。最后,我们比较了不同组之间(男性与女性、节食者与非节食者、渴望者与非渴望者)在几个饮食行为量表上的得分。荷兰版 ACQ 的验证性因子分析表明,两因素模型具有最佳的总体拟合指数,两个因素分别为“负面后果和内疚”和“渴望和情绪性进食”。这两个因素都与其他与饮食相关的维度有关。然而,渴望似乎与每周食用巧克力的量具有独特的相关性,而内疚与克制密切相关。最后,女性在几乎所有量表上的得分都更高,但在巧克力消费方面,男女之间没有显著差异。节食者报告的抑制、克制、食物思维抑制和内疚程度更高,但在渴望、饥饿和消费方面,他们与非节食者没有显著差异。