Masada Tetsuya, Tanaka Toshihiro, Sakaguchi Hiroshi, Nakagomi Masahiro, Miura Yuko, Hidaka Teruyuki, Sato Yozo, Sato Takeshi, Inoue Masayoshi, Furuich Kinya, Nishiofuku Hideyuki, Kichikawa Kimihiko
Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara.
Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jun;25(6):852-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.563. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
To compare the efficacy, complications, and inflammatory levels in partial splenic embolization (PSE) with coils or gelatin sponge (GS) particles with or without intraarterial antibiotic agents.
Forty-four patients with hypersplenism treated by PSE were assessed. GS particles were used in 31 patients, and coils were used in 13 patients. In 17 of the 31 patients who received GS, GS suspended in antibiotic solution was injected via the splenic artery. In the other 14 patients, antibiotic agents were not used. In all 13 coil group patients, an antibiotic solution was intraarterially injected before embolization. Platelet counts were compared between the GS and coil groups. Complications and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were compared among the three groups.
There were no significant differences in platelet counts and platelet increased ratios at 6 months (10.0 × 10(4)/µL and 193% in the GS group vs 9.0 × 10(4)/µL and 221% in the coil group), and no significant differences in frequencies of complications. However, one splenic abscess occurred in a patient treated with GS without antibiotics, resulting in death. The mean serum CRP level in the GS with antibiotic group at 2 weeks was significantly lower than in the other two groups.
The efficacy of PSE is similar with the use of coils versus GS particles. Prophylactic intraarterial antibiotic treatment could be useful in preventing inflammatory reactions after PSE.
比较使用弹簧圈或明胶海绵(GS)颗粒行部分脾栓塞术(PSE)时,联合或不联合动脉内使用抗生素的疗效、并发症及炎症水平。
评估44例接受PSE治疗的脾功能亢进患者。31例患者使用GS颗粒,13例患者使用弹簧圈。在接受GS治疗的31例患者中,17例经脾动脉注射悬浮于抗生素溶液中的GS。另外14例患者未使用抗生素。在所有13例弹簧圈组患者中,栓塞前经动脉注射抗生素溶液。比较GS组和弹簧圈组的血小板计数。比较三组的并发症及血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。
6个月时血小板计数及血小板升高比例在两组间无显著差异(GS组为10.0×10⁴/μL和193%,弹簧圈组为9.0×10⁴/μL和221%),并发症发生率也无显著差异。然而,1例未使用抗生素的GS治疗患者发生脾脓肿并死亡。GS联合抗生素组2周时的血清CRP平均水平显著低于其他两组。
使用弹簧圈与GS颗粒行PSE的疗效相似。预防性动脉内使用抗生素治疗可能有助于预防PSE后的炎症反应。