Preece Stephen R, Schriber Stacey M, Choudhury Kingshuk R, Suhocki Paul V, Smith Tony P, Kim Charles Y
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jun;25(6):859-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.564. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
To determine the impact of coil embolization of the splenic artery on splenic volume based on computed tomography (CT) imaging.
Splenic artery embolization (SAE) was performed in 148 consecutive patients over an 8-year period in an institutional review board-approved retrospective study. Of these, 60 patients (36 men; mean age, 49 y) had undergone contrast-enhanced CT before and after SAE with a mean time interval of 355 days. Pre- and postembolization splenic volumes were calculated with volume-rendering software. Presence of Howell-Jolly bodies was ascertained on laboratory tests. A trauma control group consisted of 39 patients with splenic laceration and follow-up CT but no splenic intervention.
SAE in trauma patients resulted in an insignificant decrease in mean spleen size from 224 cm(3) to 190 cm(3) (P = .222). However, postembolization splenic volume was significantly smaller than follow-up volume in the trauma control group (353 cm(3); P < .001). In nontrauma patients, the mean splenic volume decreased from 474 cm(3) to 399 cm(3) after SAE (P = .068). Multivariable analysis revealed that coil pack location was the only factor significantly affecting resultant splenic volume (P = .016). For trauma and nontrauma patients, distal embolization resulted in significant splenic volume loss (P = .034 and P = .013), whereas proximal embolization did not. No patients had persistent circulating Howell-Jolly bodies after SAE. No patients required repeat embolization or splenectomy.
Coil embolization of the splenic artery resulted in a modest but significant decrease in splenic volume when performed distally; proximal embolization resulted in an insignificant volume change.
基于计算机断层扫描(CT)成像确定脾动脉线圈栓塞对脾体积的影响。
在一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究中,对148例连续患者在8年期间进行了脾动脉栓塞术(SAE)。其中,60例患者(36例男性;平均年龄49岁)在SAE前后接受了对比增强CT检查,平均时间间隔为355天。使用容积再现软件计算栓塞前后的脾体积。通过实验室检查确定豪-乔小体的存在。一个创伤对照组由39例脾裂伤且接受随访CT检查但未进行脾干预的患者组成。
创伤患者的SAE导致平均脾脏大小从224 cm³降至190 cm³,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.222)。然而,创伤对照组的栓塞后脾体积明显小于随访体积(353 cm³;P < 0.001)。在非创伤患者中,SAE后平均脾体积从474 cm³降至399 cm³(P = 0.068)。多变量分析显示,线圈包位置是唯一显著影响最终脾体积的因素(P = 0.016)。对于创伤和非创伤患者,远端栓塞导致脾体积显著减少(P = 0.034和P = 0.013),而近端栓塞则没有。SAE后没有患者出现持续循环的豪-乔小体。没有患者需要重复栓塞或脾切除术。
脾动脉线圈栓塞在远端进行时导致脾体积适度但显著减小;近端栓塞导致体积变化不显著。