• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照临床试验:单切口与多切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术比较。

Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

机构信息

Departments of Surgery, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):347-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9393.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.9393
PMID:24536008
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no randomized studies that compare outcomes after single-incision (SLC) and conventional multi-incision (MLC) laparoscopic cholecystectomy under an optimized perioperative analgesic regimen.

METHODS

This patient- and assessor-blinded randomized three-centre clinical trial compared SLC and MLC in women admitted electively with cholecystolithiasis. Outcomes were registered on the day of operation (day 0), on postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 30, and 12 months after surgery. Blinding of the patients was maintained until day 3. The primary endpoint was pain on movement measured on a visual analogue scale, reported repeatedly by the patient until day 3.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population comprised 59 patients in the SLC and 58 in the MLC group. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to any of the pain-related outcomes, on-demand administration of opioids or general discomfort. Median duration of surgery was 32·5 min longer in the SLC group (P < 0·001). SLC was associated with a reduced incidence of vomiting on day 0 (7 versus 22 per cent; P = 0·019). The incidences of wound-related problems were comparable. One patient in the SLC group experienced a biliary leak requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The rates of incisional hernia at 12-month follow-up were 2 per cent in both groups. Cosmetic rating was significantly improved after SLC at 1 and 12 months (P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

SLC did not significantly diminish early pain in a setting with optimized perioperative analgesic patient care. SLC may reduce postoperative vomiting.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01268748 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

背景

在优化围手术期镇痛方案下,尚无比较单切口(SLC)与传统多切口(MLC)腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后结果的随机研究。

方法

本患者和评估者设盲的三中心随机临床试验比较了选择性胆囊结石症女性患者的 SLC 和 MLC。结果于手术日(第 0 天)、术后第 1、2、3 天和第 30 天以及术后 12 个月进行登记。患者的盲法一直维持到第 3 天。主要终点是患者反复报告的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量的运动时疼痛。

结果

意向治疗人群中 SLC 组和 MLC 组分别有 59 例和 58 例。两组之间在任何与疼痛相关的结果、按需使用阿片类药物或一般不适方面均无显著差异。SLC 组手术时间中位数长 32.5 分钟(P<0.001)。SLC 与术后第 0 天呕吐发生率降低相关(7%比 22%;P=0.019)。与切口相关的问题发生率相似。SLC 组有 1 例患者发生需要内镜逆行胰胆管造影的胆漏。两组在 12 个月随访时的切口疝发生率均为 2%。SLC 在 1 和 12 个月时的美容评分显著改善(P<0.001)。

结论

在优化围手术期镇痛患者护理的情况下,SLC 并未显著减轻早期疼痛。SLC 可能减少术后呕吐。

登记号

NCT01268748(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单切口与多切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术比较。
Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):347-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9393.
2
Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up.随机对照试验:单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较,长期随访。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Aug;405(5):551-561. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01911-1. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
3
Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy.基于专长的腹腔镜与小切口开腹胆囊切除术随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):886-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9133.
4
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jul;97(7):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7087.
5
Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的比较:前瞻性病例对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea44.
6
Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.中期报告:一项比较单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的随机对照试验。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Feb;6(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2012.00154.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
7
Randomized clinical trial of the effect of preoperative dexamethasone on nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.术前地塞米松对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后恶心呕吐影响的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):295-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5252.
8
Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.
9
Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单孔、迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2013 Feb;100(3):339-49. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9003. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
Prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of local anesthetic and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative pain management after laparoscopic surgery.局部麻醉药与非甾体类抗炎药用于腹腔镜手术后疼痛管理的前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照比较。
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):618-24; discussion 624-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report.全内脏转位患者的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一例报告
Am J Case Rep. 2025 May 19;26:e946523. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.946523.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy conventional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 18;11:754. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122102.1. eCollection 2022.
3
Incidence of incisional hernias and cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: a long-term follow-up cohort study of 125 patients.
腹腔镜单切口胆囊切除术后切口疝的发生率及美容效果:一项对125例患者的长期随访队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Nov 16;86(1):50-55. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001442. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society.中线切口疝指南:欧洲疝学会
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1732-1768. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad284.
5
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的系统评价和Meta分析
Cureus. 2022 Dec 14;14(12):e32524. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32524. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic.肥胖患者的微创单孔胆囊切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Sep 15;22(3):87-88. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.3.87.
7
Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set.有症状非复杂性胆结石疾病相关结局的识别与分类:为制定核心结局集提供信息的深入分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 24;11(6):e045568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045568.
8
Trans-stomal single-port laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal is an efficacious and efficient procedure: a case-controlled study.经肛单孔腹腔镜Hartmann 术式逆行还纳术是一种有效且高效的手术方式:一项病例对照研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 May;24(5):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02166-0. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
9
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4315-4329. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07198-8. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Etiologies of Long-Term Postcholecystectomy Symptoms: A Systematic Review.胆囊切除术后长期症状的病因:一项系统评价
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Apr 14;2019:4278373. doi: 10.1155/2019/4278373. eCollection 2019.