• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于专长的腹腔镜与小切口开腹胆囊切除术随机临床试验。

Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):886-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9133.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.9133
PMID:23640665
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several randomized clinical trials have compared laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and small-incision open cholecystectomy (SIOC). Most have had wide exclusion criteria and none was expertise-based. The aim of this expertise-based randomized trial was to compare healthcare costs, quality of life (QoL), pain and clinical outcomes after LC and SIOC.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were randomized to treatment by one of two teams of surgeons with a preference for either LC or SIOC. Each team performed their specific method (SIOC or LC) as a first-choice operation, but converted to open cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration when necessary. Intraoperative cholangiography was carried out routinely. The intention was to include all patients undergoing cholecystectomy, including emergency operations and procedures involving surgical training for residents.

RESULTS

Some 74·9 per cent of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy were included. Of 355 patients randomized, 333 were analysed. Self-estimated QoL scores in 258 patients, analysed by the area under the curve method, were significantly lower in the SIOC group at 1 month after surgery: median 2326 (95 per cent confidence interval 2187 to 2391) compared with 2411 (2334 to 2502) for the LC group (P = 0·030). The mean(s.d.) duration of operation was shorter for SIOC: 97(41) versus 120(48) min (P < 0·001). There were no significant differences between the groups in conversion rate, pain, complications, length of hospital stay or readmissions.

CONCLUSION

SIOC had comparable surgical results but slightly worse short-term QoL compared with LC.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00370344 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

背景

几项随机临床试验比较了腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)和小切口开腹胆囊切除术(SIOC)。大多数研究都有广泛的排除标准,而且没有基于专业知识的研究。本项基于专业知识的随机试验旨在比较 LC 和 SIOC 后的医疗保健成本、生活质量(QoL)、疼痛和临床结果。

方法

计划接受胆囊切除术的患者被随机分为两组外科医生治疗,每组医生都更倾向于使用 LC 或 SIOC。每个团队都将其特定的方法(SIOC 或 LC)作为首选手术,但在必要时转为开腹胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术。常规进行术中胆管造影。目的是包括所有接受胆囊切除术的患者,包括急诊手术和为住院医师提供手术培训的手术。

结果

所有接受胆囊切除术的患者中约有 74.9%被纳入。在 355 名随机患者中,有 333 名患者进行了分析。通过曲线下面积法分析 258 名患者的自我估计 QoL 评分,术后 1 个月 SIOC 组明显低于 LC 组:中位数为 2326(95%置信区间为 2187 至 2391),LC 组为 2411(2334 至 2502)(P = 0.030)。SIOC 的手术时间平均(标准差)更短:97(41)与 120(48)分钟(P < 0.001)。两组之间的转化率、疼痛、并发症、住院时间或再入院率均无显著差异。

结论

与 LC 相比,SIOC 具有相似的手术结果,但短期 QoL 略差。

注册号

NCT00370344(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

相似文献

1
Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy.基于专长的腹腔镜与小切口开腹胆囊切除术随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):886-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9133.
2
Costs and quality of life of small-incision open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - an expertise-based randomised controlled trial.小切口开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本及生活质量——一项基于专业知识的随机对照试验
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0601-1.
3
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus small incision cholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstones disease.有症状胆结石疾病的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术对比
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 Oct;22(10):627-31. doi: 10.2012/JCPSP.627631.
4
Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单切口与多切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术比较。
Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):347-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9393.
5
An evaluation of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的比较评估
Med J Aust. 1994 Jan 17;160(2):58-62.
6
Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Br J Surg. 2011 Dec;98(12):1695-702. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7689. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
7
Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机前瞻性研究。
J Surg Res. 2011 Apr;166(2):e109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.885. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
8
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
9
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jul;97(7):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7087.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182402448.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting of health-related quality of life in emergency laparotomy trials: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.报告在急诊剖腹手术试验中与健康相关的生活质量:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03531-w. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review.腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后的患者报告结局测量(PROM):系统评价。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062.
3
Feasibility study for a randomized clinical trial of bupivacaine, lidocaine with adrenaline, or placebo wound infiltration to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
布比卡因、利多卡因加肾上腺素或安慰剂用于减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的随机临床试验可行性研究。
BJS Open. 2019 Mar 26;3(4):453-460. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50159. eCollection 2019 Aug.
4
Short and Long-Term Outcomes After Surgical Procedures Lasting for More Than Six Hours.手术时间超过 6 小时的短期和长期结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 23;7(1):9221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09833-7.
5
Preoperative cardiac evaluation with transthoracic echocardiography before non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术前经胸超声心动图进行术前心脏评估。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Aug;70(4):390-397. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.390. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Costs and quality of life of small-incision open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - an expertise-based randomised controlled trial.小切口开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本及生活质量——一项基于专业知识的随机对照试验
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0601-1.
7
Patient-Reported Outcomes for Acute Gallstone Pathology.急性胆结石病理的患者报告结局
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1234-1238. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3854-x.
8
Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后生活质量的改善:腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术患者健康状况(RAND-36)的随机多中心研究
Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):665-671. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1485-1. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
9
The future of trials in surgical oncology.外科肿瘤学临床试验的未来。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul;12(7):425-31. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.72. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
10
Are paediatric operations evidence based? A prospective analysis of general surgery practice in a teaching paediatric hospital.小儿手术有循证依据吗?一家教学型儿科医院普通外科实践的前瞻性分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Jan;31(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3624-5. Epub 2014 Nov 5.